This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TJ0060
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International Registration designating the European Union – Word mark MASTIHACARE – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-60/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.
Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – International Registration designating the European Union – Word mark MASTIHACARE – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-60/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.
Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – International Registration designating the European Union – Word mark MASTIHACARE – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-60/20.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:629