This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0296
Case T-296/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — SU v EIOPA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for a fixed period — Non-renewal — Renewal procedure — Taking into account of appraisal reports — Non-finalised appraisal report — Liability — Material damage — Loss of opportunity — Non-material damage — Unlimited jurisdiction — Implementation of a judgment of the General Court)
Case T-296/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — SU v EIOPA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for a fixed period — Non-renewal — Renewal procedure — Taking into account of appraisal reports — Non-finalised appraisal report — Liability — Material damage — Loss of opportunity — Non-material damage — Unlimited jurisdiction — Implementation of a judgment of the General Court)
Case T-296/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — SU v EIOPA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for a fixed period — Non-renewal — Renewal procedure — Taking into account of appraisal reports — Non-finalised appraisal report — Liability — Material damage — Loss of opportunity — Non-material damage — Unlimited jurisdiction — Implementation of a judgment of the General Court)
OJ C 63, 20.2.2023, p. 37–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.2.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 63/37 |
Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — SU v EIOPA
(Case T-296/21) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract for a fixed period - Non-renewal - Renewal procedure - Taking into account of appraisal reports - Non-finalised appraisal report - Liability - Material damage - Loss of opportunity - Non-material damage - Unlimited jurisdiction - Implementation of a judgment of the General Court)
(2023/C 63/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: SU (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (represented by: C. Coucke and E. Karatza, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) of 15 July 2020 by which the latter did not renew her contract and, so far as necessary, of the decision of 11 February 2021 by which it rejected her complaint and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material damage she claims to have suffered as a result.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) of 15 July 2020 not to renew SU’s contract as a member of the temporary staff; |
|
2. |
Annuls the decision of EIOPA of 11 February 2021 rejecting SU’s complaint; |
|
3. |
Orders EIOPA to pay EUR 10 000 as compensation for the material damage sustained by SU; |
|
4. |
Orders EIOPA to pay EUR 5 000 as compensation for the non-material damage sustained by SU; |
|
5. |
Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
|
6. |
Orders EIOPA to pay the costs. |