Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012TN0123

Case T-123/12: Action brought on 15 March 2012 — Smartbook v OHIM (SMARTBOOK)

OJ C 157, 2.6.2012, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

2.6.2012   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/8


Action brought on 15 March 2012 — Smartbook v OHIM (SMARTBOOK)

(Case T-123/12)

2012/C 157/13

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Smartbook AG (Offenburg, Germany) (represented by C. Milbradt and A. Schwarz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 December 2011 (Case R 799/2011-2);

order the defendant to pay the costs including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SMARTBOOK’ (application No 8 426 348) for goods in Classes 9, 16 and 28

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the mark applied for has distinctive character and is not descriptive of the goods at issue.


Top
  翻译: