This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TA0524
Case T-524/12: Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2013 — Recaro v OHIM — Certino Mode (RECARO) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark RECARO — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(15)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Nature of the use of the mark — Admissibility of new evidence — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-524/12: Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2013 — Recaro v OHIM — Certino Mode (RECARO) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark RECARO — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(15)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Nature of the use of the mark — Admissibility of new evidence — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-524/12: Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2013 — Recaro v OHIM — Certino Mode (RECARO) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark RECARO — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(15)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Nature of the use of the mark — Admissibility of new evidence — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
OJ C 9, 11.1.2014, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
11.1.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 9/23 |
Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2013 — Recaro v OHIM — Certino Mode (RECARO)
(Case T-524/12) (1)
(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark RECARO - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(15)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Nature of the use of the mark - Admissibility of new evidence - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
2014/C 9/38
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Recaro Holding GmbH, formerly Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH (Stuttgart (Germany)) (represented by: J. Weiser, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Certino Mode SL (Elche (Spain))
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 September 2012 (Case R 1761/2011-1) relating to revocation proceedings between Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH and Certino Mode SL
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Recaro Holding GmbH to pay the costs. |