All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0657
Case C-657/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 December 2013 — Verder LabTec GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Hilden
Case C-657/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 December 2013 — Verder LabTec GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Hilden
Case C-657/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 December 2013 — Verder LabTec GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Hilden
OJ C 71, 8.3.2014, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
8.3.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 71/8 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 December 2013 — Verder LabTec GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt Hilden
(Case C-657/13)
(2014/C 71/13)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Finanzgericht Düsseldorf
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Verder LabTec GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant: Finanzamt Hilden
Question referred
Is it consistent with the freedom of establishment under Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union if, upon the transfer of an asset from a domestic to a foreign permanent establishment of the same undertaking, a national rule stipulates that there is a withdrawal for non-business purposes, with the result that the disclosure of hidden reserves leads to a profit upon the withdrawal, and another national rule provides the possibility of distributing that profit equally over five or ten financial years?