This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0479
Case T-479/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)
Case T-479/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)
Case T-479/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)
OJ C 383, 17.10.2016, p. 22–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
17.10.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 383/22 |
Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)
(Case T-479/16)
(2016/C 383/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler, A. Stolz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘AROMASENSATIONS’ — Application for registration No 14 198 824
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 in Case R 2482/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision to the extent that it dismisses the appeal insofar as it is based on Article 7(1)(b); |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of principles of equal treatment and sound administration. |