This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0747
Case T-747/14: Action brought on 5 November 2014 — Merck v OHIM — Nestlé (HEALTHPRESSO)
Case T-747/14: Action brought on 5 November 2014 — Merck v OHIM — Nestlé (HEALTHPRESSO)
Case T-747/14: Action brought on 5 November 2014 — Merck v OHIM — Nestlé (HEALTHPRESSO)
OJ C 462, 22.12.2014, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.12.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 462/32 |
Action brought on 5 November 2014 — Merck v OHIM — Nestlé (HEALTHPRESSO)
(Case T-747/14)
(2014/C 462/44)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société de Produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘HEALTHPRESSO’ — Application for registration No 1 0 0 03 028
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 August 2014 in Case R 1880/2013-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Partially annul the contested decision insofar as the Board of Appeal upheld the opposition and rejected the CTM application for the goods in Class 30; |
|
— |
Reject opposition No B 1 1 91 607; |
|
— |
Order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 96(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |