This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TB0023
Case T-23/14: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — Bos and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union — Substantial reduction in the number of days of annual leave for officials and other servants serving in a third country — Lack of individual concern — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-23/14: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — Bos and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union — Substantial reduction in the number of days of annual leave for officials and other servants serving in a third country — Lack of individual concern — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-23/14: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — Bos and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union — Substantial reduction in the number of days of annual leave for officials and other servants serving in a third country — Lack of individual concern — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 16, 19.1.2015, p. 39–40
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.1.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 16/39 |
Order of the General Court of 11 November 2014 — Bos and Others v Parliament and Council
(Case T-23/14) (1)
(Action for annulment - Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Substantial reduction in the number of days of annual leave for officials and other servants serving in a third country - Lack of individual concern - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2015/C 016/62)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Mark Bos (Ankara, Turkey); Estelle Kadouch (Jerusalem, Israel); Siegfried Krahl (Lago Sul, Brazil); and Eric Lunel (Dakar, Senegal) (represented by: F. Krenc, lawyer)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and E. Taneva, acting as Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment brought under Article 263 TFEU against point 70 of Article 1 of Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 15), in so far as it amends Annex X to Regulation No 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC), laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 1962, 45, p. 1385).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Mark Bos, Estelle Kadouch, Siegfried Krahl and Eric Lunel shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. |
|
3. |
There is no need to give a ruling on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission. |