ISSN 1725-2555 |
||
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269 |
|
![]() |
||
English edition |
Legislation |
Volume 47 |
|
|
Corrigenda |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(1) Text with EEA relevance |
EN |
Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
I Acts whose publication is obligatory
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/1 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1452/2004
of 16 August 2004
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in the Annex thereto. |
(2) |
In compliance with the above criteria, the standard import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the Annex to this Regulation, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 August 2004.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2004.
For the Commission
J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
Agriculture Director-General
(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).
ANNEX
to Commission Regulation of 16 August 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
(EUR/100 kg) |
||
CN code |
Third country code (1) |
Standard import value |
0707 00 05 |
052 |
92,6 |
999 |
92,6 |
|
0709 90 70 |
052 |
78,8 |
999 |
78,8 |
|
0805 50 10 |
382 |
55,0 |
388 |
54,8 |
|
508 |
46,6 |
|
524 |
68,9 |
|
528 |
51,1 |
|
999 |
55,3 |
|
0806 10 10 |
052 |
101,9 |
220 |
100,7 |
|
400 |
179,7 |
|
624 |
139,5 |
|
999 |
130,5 |
|
0808 10 20 , 0808 10 50 , 0808 10 90 |
388 |
80,2 |
400 |
100,8 |
|
404 |
115,9 |
|
508 |
59,9 |
|
512 |
82,3 |
|
528 |
108,5 |
|
720 |
53,0 |
|
800 |
162,8 |
|
804 |
79,0 |
|
999 |
93,6 |
|
0808 20 50 |
052 |
143,4 |
388 |
96,5 |
|
528 |
81,3 |
|
999 |
107,1 |
|
0809 30 10 , 0809 30 90 |
052 |
149,3 |
999 |
149,3 |
|
0809 40 05 |
052 |
101,8 |
066 |
32,0 |
|
094 |
33,4 |
|
624 |
142,6 |
|
999 |
77,5 |
(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘ 999 ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/3 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1453/2004
of 16 August 2004
concerning the permanent authorisation of certain additives in feedingstuffs
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs (1), and in particular Article 3 and Article 9d(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Directive 70/524/EEC provides for the authorisation of additives to be used in the Community. The additives referred to in Part II of Annex C to that Directive may be authorised without a time limit subject to certain conditions being satisfied. |
(2) |
The use of the micro-organism preparation of Bacillus licheniformis (DSM 5749) and Bacillus subtilis (DSM 5750) was provisionally authorised, for the first time, for sows, by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2437/2000 (2). |
(3) |
New data were submitted in support of the application for authorisation without a time limit of that preparation. The assessment shows that the conditions laid down in Directive 70/524/EEC for such authorisation are satisfied. |
(4) |
Accordingly, the use of that preparation for sows, as specified in the Annex I, should be authorised without a time limit. |
(5) |
The use of the micro-organism preparation of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi (NCIMB 40112/CNCM I–1012) was provisionally authorised, for the first time, for pigs for fattening by Commission Directive 94/17/EC (3). |
(6) |
The Scientific Committee on Animal Nutrition (SCAN), in its report on Bacillus cereus var. toyoi (NCIMB 40112/CNCM I–1012) adopted on 5 December 2001, confirmed that preparation, when used in the animal categories piglets, pigs for fattening and sows, satisfies the conditions of Article 3a(b) of Directive 70/524/EEC. The SCAN report also concluded favourably on the efficacy of that preparation when used in the animal categories piglets to two months and sows. |
(7) |
New data were submitted in support of the application for authorisation without a time limit of that preparation. |
(8) |
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was asked to issue on opinion on the efficacy of that preparation when used as feed additive for pigs for fattening. In its opinion adopted on 7 May 2004, the EFSA concluded favourably on the efficacy regarding that preparation and the whole assessment shows that the conditions laid down in Directive 70/524/EEC for such authorisation are satisfied. |
(9) |
Accordingly, the use of that preparation for pigs for fattening, as specified in Annex I, should be authorised without a time limit. |
(10) |
The use of the enzyme preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase and endo-1,4-beta-glucanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 600.94) set out in the first row of Annex II was provisionally authorised, for the first time, for chickens for fattening, turkeys for fattening and piglets by Commission Regulation (EC) No 654/2000 (4). |
(11) |
The use of the enzyme preparation of endo-1,4-beta-glucanase and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 600.94) set out in the second row of Annex II was provisionally authorised, for the first time, for chickens for fattening, by Commission Regulation (EC) No 654/2000. |
(12) |
The use of the enzyme preparation of endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum (ATCC 2106) and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum (IMI SD 135) and polygalacturonase produced by Aspergillus aculeatus (CBS 589.94) was provisionally authorised, for the first time, for pigs for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2690/1999 (5). |
(13) |
The use of the enzyme preparation of endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (phoenicis) (NRRL 25541) and of alpha-amylase produced by Aspergillus oryzae (ATCC 66222) was provisionally authorised, for the first time, for piglets by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1636/1999 (6). |
(14) |
The use of the enzyme preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase, produced from Trichoderma longibrachiatum (CNCM MA 6–10W) was provisionally authorised, for the first time, for chickens for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1436/98 (7). |
(15) |
New data were submitted in support of the application for authorisation without a time limit of those five enzyme preparations. The assessment shows that the conditions laid down in Directive 70/524/EEC for such authorisation are satisfied. |
(16) |
Accordingly, the use of those five enzyme preparations as specified in Annex II, should be authorised without a time limit. |
(17) |
The assessment of those seven applications shows that certain procedures should be required to protect workers from exposure to the additives set out in the Annexes. Such protection should be assured by the application of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (8). |
(18) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The preparations belonging to the groups ‘Micro-organisms’ and ‘Enzymes’, as set out in Annexes I and II are authorised for use without a time limit as additives in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in those Annexes.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2004.
For the Commission
David BYRNE
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1 Directive as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1289/2004 (OJ L 243, 15.7.2004, p. 15).
(2) OJ L 280, 4.11.2000, p. 28.
(3) OJ L 105, 26.4.1994, p. 19.
(4) OJ L 79, 30.3.2000, p. 26.
(5) OJ L 326, 18.12.1999, p. 33.
(6) OJ L 194, 27.7.1999, p. 17.
(7) OJ L 191, 7.7.1998, p. 15.
(8) OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1. Directive as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
ANNEX I
EC No |
Additive |
Chemical formula, description |
Species or category of animal |
Maximum age |
Minimum content |
Maximum content |
Other provisions |
End of period of authorisation |
CFU/kg of complete feedingstuff |
||||||||
Micro-organisms |
||||||||
E 1700 |
Bacillus licheniformis DSM 5749 Bacillus subtilis DSM 5750 (In 1/1 ratio) |
Mixture of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis containing a minimum of: 3,2 × 109 CFU/g additive (1,6 × 109 CFU/g additive of each bacterium) |
Sows |
— |
1,28 × 109 |
1,28 × 109 |
In the directions for use of the additive and premixture, indicate the storage temperature, storage life and stability to pelleting. For sows two weeks before farrowing and during the lactation. |
Without a time limit |
E 1701 |
Bacillus cereus var. toyoi NCIMB 40112/CNCM I-1012 |
Preparation of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi containing a minimum of 1 × 1010 CFU/g additive |
Piglets |
From two to four months |
0,5 × 109 |
1 × 109 |
In the directions for use of the additive and premixture indicate the storage temperature, storage life and stability to pelleting. |
Without a time limit |
Pigs for fattening |
From four months until slaughter |
0,2 × 109 |
1 × 109 |
In the directions for use of the additive and premixture indicate the storage temperature, storage life and stability to pelleting. |
Without a time limit |
ANNEX II
EC No |
Additive |
Chemical formula, description |
Species or category of animal |
Maximum age |
Minimum content |
Maximum content |
Other provisions |
End of period of authorisation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Units of activity/kg of complete feedingstuff |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enzymes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E 1609 |
Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase EC 3.2.1.8 Endo-1,4-beta-glucanase EC 3.2.1.4 |
Preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase and endo-1,4-beta-glucanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 600.94) having minimum activities of:
|
Chickens for fattening |
— |
4 860 FXU |
— |
|
Without a time limit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 025 BGU |
— |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turkeys for fattening |
— |
6 000 FXU |
— |
|
Without a time limit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 500 BGU |
— |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Piglets (weaned) |
— |
6 000 FXU |
— |
|
Without a time limit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 500 BGU |
— |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E 1610 |
Endo-1,4-beta-glucanase EC 3.2.1.4 Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase EC 3.2.1.8 |
Preparation of endo-1,4-beta-glucanase and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 600.94) having minimum activities of:
|
Chickens for fattening |
— |
5 000 BGU |
— |
|
Without a time limit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 000 FXU |
— |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E 1611 |
Endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase EC 3.2.1.6 Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase EC 3.2.1.8 Polygalacturonase EC 3.2.1.15 |
Preparation of endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum (ATCC 2106) and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Trichoderma longibrachiatum (IMI SD 135) and polygalacturonase produced by Aspergillus aculeatus (CBS 589.94) having a minimum activity of:
|
Pigs for fattening |
— |
endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase: 400 U |
— |
|
Without a time limit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
endo-1,4-beta-xylanase: 400 U |
— |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
polygalacturonase: 50 U |
— |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E 1612 |
Endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase EC 3.2.1.6 Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase EC 3.2.1.8 Alpha-amylase EC 3.2.1.1 |
Preparation of endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (phoenicis) (NRRL 25541) and of alpha-amylase produced by Aspergillus oryzae (ATCC 66222) having a minimum activity of:
|
Piglets (weaned) |
— |
endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase: 138 U |
— |
|
Without a time limit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
endo-1,4-beta-xylanase: 200 U |
— |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
alpha-amylase: 1 550 U |
— |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E 1613 |
Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase EC 3.2.1.8 |
Preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase, produced from Trichoderma longibrachiatum (CNCM MA 6 - 10W), having a minimum activity of:
|
Chickens for fattening |
— |
1 050 IFP |
— |
|
Without a time limit |
(1) 1 FXU is the amount of enzyme which liberates 0,15 micromoles of xylose from azurine-cross-linked xylan per minute at pH 5,0 and 40 °C.
(2) 1 BGU is the amount of enzyme which liberates 0,15 micromoles of xylose from azurine-cross-linked beta-glucan per minute at pH 5,0 and 40 °C.
(3) 1 BGU is the amount of enzyme which liberates 0,15 micromoles of xylose from azurine-cross-linked beta-glucan per minute at pH 5,0 and 40 °C.
(4) 1 FXU is the amount of enzyme which liberates 0,15 micromoles of xylose from azurine-cross-linked xylan per minute at pH 5,0 and 40 °C.
(5) 1 U is the amount of enzyme which liberates 1 micromole of reducing sugars (glucose equivalents) from barley beta-glucan per minute at pH 5,0 and 30 °C.
(6) 1 U is the amount of enzyme which liberates 1 micromole of reducing sugars (xylose equivalents) from oat spelt xylan per minute at pH 5,3 and 50 °C.
(7) 1 U is the amount of enzyme which liberates 1 micromole of reducing material (galacturonic acid equivalents) from a poly D-galacturonic substrate per minute at pH 5,0 and 40 °C.
(8) 1 U is the amount of enzyme which liberates 1 micromole of reducing sugars (glucose equivalents) from oat beta-glucan per minute at pH 5,0 and 40 °C.
(9) 1 U is the amount of enzyme which liberates 1 micromole of reducing sugars (glucose equivalents) from oat xylan per minute at pH 4,0 and 30 °C.
(10) 1 U is the amount of enzyme which liberates 1 micromole of reducing sugars (glucose equivalents) from wheat starch per minute at pH 4,0 and 30 °C.
(11) 1 IFP is the quantity of enzyme which liberates 1 micromole of reducing sugars (measured as xylose equivalent) from oat xylan per minute at pH 4,8 and 50 °C.
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/9 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1454/2004
of 16 August 2004
amending Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 as regards physical checks carried out when agricultural products qualifying for refunds are exported
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 of 12 February 1990 on the monitoring carried out at the time of export of agricultural products receiving refunds or other amounts (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Article 10(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002 (2) requires Member States to execute a number of substitution checks each calendar year, which shall not be less than the number of days on which export refund products leave the Community’s customs territory. It should be clarified that the number of substitution checks should not be less than the number of days or half the number of days on which consignments of export refund products, not sealed according to the first subparagraph of Article 10(2), leave the Community's customs territory through the customs office of exit concerned. |
(2) |
Article 11 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002 requires Member States to submit annual evaluations on the implementation and effectiveness of the checks carried out under that Regulation and the procedures applied to selecting the goods subject to physical checks. |
(3) |
Article 26(7) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (3) also requires Member States to submit annual evaluations on the implementation and effectiveness of the checks carried out under Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002 on payment declarations. |
(4) |
The elements of those annual reports should be set out more in detail in order to ensure transparency and to enable a common evaluation. |
(5) |
Those annual reports should be drawn up on this basis from the 2005 report covering the year 2004. As Member States may need organisational adaptations for gathering information on the requested value of refunds, they may choose to report such information from the 2006 report covering the year 2005. |
(6) |
The Management Committees concerned have not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by their chairman, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002 is amended as follows:
1. |
in Article 10 (2), the second and third subparagraphs are replaced by the following: ‘The number of substitution checks carried out each calendar year shall not be less than the number of days on which consignments of export refund products, not sealed according to the first subparagraph, leave the Community's customs territory through the customs office of exit concerned. Where only one exporter is subject to the substitution check, that number may not be less than half the number of days on which consignments of export refund products, not sealed according to the first subparagraph, leave the Community's customs territory through the customs office of exit concerned.’; |
2. |
Article 11 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 11 Before 1 May each year, the Member States shall send to the Commission a report evaluating the implementation and effectiveness of the checks carried out under this Regulation and the procedures applied to selecting the goods subject to physical checks. The report shall include the elements listed in Annex III covering export declarations accepted between 1 January and 31 December of the preceding year. The reports shall be submitted on an ISO 9660 compatible CD-ROM or equivalent electronic data medium and on paper. For the 2005 annual report covering declarations accepted in 2004, Member States may choose not to report:
|
3. |
the text in the Annex to this Regulation is added as Annex III. |
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2004.
For the Commission
Franz FISCHLER
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 42, 16.2.1990, p. 6. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 163/94 (OJ L 24, 29.1.1994, p. 2).
(2) OJ L 322, 27.11.2002, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 909/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 61).
(3) OJ L 102, 17.4.1999, p. 11. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 671/2004 (OJ L 105, 14.4.2004, p. 5).
ANNEX
‘ANNEX III
ELEMENTS OF THE ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 11
1. Execution of checks at the customs offices of export
1.1. The number of export declarations per sector per customs office not excluded under Article 2 when calculating the minimum rate of checks.
1.2. Indication whether declarations were excluded under Article 2(2)(a) or under Article 2(2)(b).
1.3. The number of physical checks carried out per sector per customs office.
1.4. If applicable, a list of customs offices applying reduced rates of checks pursuant to Article 6(c).
1.5. The number of checks by sector which led to the detection of irregularities, the financial incidence of irregularities detected exceeding a refund value of EUR 200 including, where applicable, the reference number used for the communication referred to in Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 (*1).
1.6. If applicable, the updating of the number of irregularities which were communicated to the Commission in the preceding annual reports.
1.7. The requested value of refunds per sector of declarations subjected to physical checks.
2. Execution of substitution checks at the customs offices of exit
2.1. The number of days per customs office of exit on which consignments of export refund products, not sealed according to the first subparagraph of Article 10(2), have left the customs territory of the Community through the particular customs office of exit.
2.2. The number of substitution checks referred to in Article 10(2) carried out per customs office of exit.
2.3. The number of export declarations for which the customs office of export has not sealed the means of transport or the packaging.
The number of export declarations for which the seals affixed on departure have been removed other than under customs supervision, or the seals have been broken or the dispensation from sealing under Article 357(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 has not been granted.
2.4. The number of specific substitution checks referred to in Article 10(2a) of this Regulation executed per customs office.
2.5. The number of substitution checks referred to in Article 10(2) of this Regulation which led to the detection of irregularities, the financial incidence of irregularities detected exceeding a refund value of EUR 200, including, where applicable, the reference number which is used for communication referred to in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91.
The number of specific substitution checks referred to in Article 10(2a) of this Regulation which led to the detection of irregularities, the financial incidence of irregularities detected exceeding a refund value of EUR 200, including, where applicable, the reference number which is used for communication referred to in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91.
2.6. If applicable, the updating of the number of irregularities which were communicated to the Commission in the preceding annual report.
2.7. To what extent the customs offices of exit applied Article 10(7) of this Regulation and which information was given from the paying agencies concerned.
3. Procedures for the selection of consignments for physical checks
3.1. A description of the procedures for the selection of consignments for physical checks and their effectiveness.
4. Modifications of the risk analysis system or strategy
The information in point 4.1 is requested from the Member States applying a risk analysis pursuant to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 386/90.
4.1. A description of all modifications of the measures notified to the Commission under Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 3122/94 (*2).
5. Detailed information on selection systems and on the risk analysis system
The information in points 5.1 to 5.4 is requested from the Member States applying a risk analysis pursuant to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 3122/94. The information shall only be submitted if there have been modifications since the latest report.
The information in point 5.5 is requested from the Member States not applying a risk analysis pursuant to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 3122/94.
5.1. Description of the uniform system, if existent, of recording the weighting rate of risks associated with each consignment.
5.2. Description of the intervals of the periodical evaluation and revision of the assessed risks.
5.3. Description of the monitoring and feedback system in order to ensure that targeted checks are carried out or that satisfactory reasons are recorded for not doing so.
5.4. If there hasn’t been any revision of risk evaluation (see point 5.2) for the latest reporting periods, explain why the existing evaluation still remains the appropriate means to ensure the effectiveness of physical checks.
5.5. If a risk analysis pursuant to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 3122/94 is not applied, explain why the existing system of checks still remains the appropriate means to ensure the effectiveness of physical checks.
6. Coordination with Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89
6.1. Description of the measures pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 which have been taken in order to improve the coordination with Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89.
7. Difficulties in applying Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 and this Regulation
7.1. Description of any difficulties encountered in the application of Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 or this Regulation and the measures taken to overcome them or proposals to that end.
8. Evaluation of the checks carried out
8.1. Evaluation whether the checks have been carried out satisfactorily.
8.2. Report whether the certifying body referred to in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 (*3) made any statements regarding the execution of physical and substitution checks in its latest report pursuant to Article 3(1) of that Regulation and indicate the respective place in the report (chapter, page etc). If the report contains recommendations on the improvement of the system of physical and substitution checks, indicate which measures have been implemented in order to improve the system.
8.3. The Member States not yet having implemented the measures as meant under point 8.2 when drawing up the annual report shall deliver this information by 31 July of the year the annual report is submitted.
9. Suggestions for improvement
9.1. Where appropriate, suggestions for improvement, either in the application of the Regulation, or in the Regulation itself.
10. Physical checks on products or goods placed under prefinancing pursuant to Article 26(7) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999
For the physical checks, executed on the basis of payment declarations, for application of Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 565/80 (*4), the following shall be reported:
10.1. The number of payment declarations per sector per customs office not excluded under Article 2 of this Regulation when calculating the minimum rate of checks.
10.2. The number of physical checks per sector per customs office.
10.3. The number of checks by sector which led to the detection of irregularities, the financial incidence of irregularities detected exceeding a refund value of EUR 200 including where applicable, the reference number used for the communication referred to in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91.
(*1) OJ L 67, 14.3.1991, p. 11.
(*2) OJ L 330, 21.12.1994, p. 31.
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/14 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1455/2004
of 16 August 2004
concerning the authorisation for 10 years of the additive ‘Avatec 15 %’ in feedingstuffs, belonging to the group of coccidiostats and other medicinal substances
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs (1), and in particular Article 9g(5)(b) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
In accordance with Directive 70/524/EEC, coccidiostats included in Annex I to that Directive before 1 January 1988 were provisionally authorised as from 1 April 1998 and transferred to Chapter I of Annex B with a view to their re-evaluation as additives linked to a person responsible for putting them into circulation. The lasalocid sodium product, Avatec 15 %, is an additive belonging to the group ‘Coccidiostats and other medicinal substances’ listed in Chapter I of Annex B to Directive 70/524/EEC. |
(2) |
The person responsible for putting into circulation Avatec 15 % submitted an application for authorisation and a dossier, according to Article 9g(2) and (4) of that Directive. |
(3) |
Article 9g(6) of Directive 70/524/EEC allows the automatic extension of the period of authorisation of the additives concerned until the Commission takes a decision in the case where, for reasons beyond the control of the authorisation holder, no decision may be taken on the application before the expiry date of the authorisation. This provision is applicable to the authorisation of Avatec 15 %. The Commission requested a full risk evaluation from the Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition on 26 April 2001 and this request was consequently transferred to the European Food Safety Authority. Several requests for additional information were made during the re-evaluation process, making it impossible to complete the re-evaluation within the time limits required by Article 9g. |
(4) |
The Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed attached to the European Food Safety Authority has delivered a favourable opinion with regard to the safety and to the efficacy of Avatec 15 % for chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying. |
(5) |
The re-evaluation of Avatec 15 % carried out by the Commission showed that the relevant conditions laid down in Directive 70/524/EEC are satisfied. Avatec 15 % should therefore be authorised for 10 years as an additive linked to the person responsible for putting it into circulation and included in Chapter I of the list referred to Article 9t(b) of that Directive. |
(6) |
As the authorisation for the additive is now linked to a person responsible for putting it into circulation, and replaces the previous authorisation which was not linked to any specific person, it is appropriate to delete the latter authorisation. |
(7) |
Since there are no safety reasons for withdrawing the product lasalocid sodium from the market immediately, it is appropriate to allow a transitional period of six months for the disposal of existing stocks of the additive. |
(8) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Chapter I of Annex B to Directive 70/524/EEC is amended as follows: The additive lasalocid sodium, belonging to the group ‘Coccidiostats and other medical substances’, shall be deleted.
Article 2
The additive Avatec 15 %, belonging to the group ‘Coccidiostats and other medical substances’, as set out in the Annex to the present Regulation, is authorised for use in animal nutrition under the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Article 3
A period of six months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation is permitted to use up the existing stocks of lasalocid sodium.
Article 4
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2004.
For the Commission
David BYRNE
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1289/2004 (OJ L 243, 15.7.2004, p. 15).
ANNEX
Registration number of additive |
Name and registration number of person responsible for putting additive into circulation |
Additive (Trade name) |
Composition, chemical formula, description |
Species or category of animal |
Maximum age |
Minimum content |
Maximum content |
Other provisions |
End of period of authorisation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
mg of active substance/kg of complete feedingstuff |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coccidiostats and other medicinal substances |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
‘E 763 |
Alpharma (Belgium) BVBA |
Lasalocid A sodium 15 g/100 g (Avatec 15 % cc) |
Additive composition
Active substance
|
Chickens for fattening |
— |
75 |
125 |
Use prohibited at least five days before slaughter. Indicate in the instructions for use: “Dangerous for equine species” “This feedingstuff contains an ionophore: simultaneous use with certain medicinal substances can be contraindicated” |
20 August 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Chickens reared for laying |
16 weeks |
75 |
125 |
Use prohibited at least five days before slaughter. Indicate in the instructions for use: “Dangerous for equine species” “This feedingstuff contains an ionophore: simultaneous use with certain medicinal substances can be contraindicated” |
20 August 2014’ |
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/17 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1456/2004
of 16 August 2004
on import licences in respect of beef and veal products originating in Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 of 10 December 2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1706/98 (2),
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003 of 19 December 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application in the beef and veal sector of Council Regulation (EC) No 2286/2002 on the arrangements applicable to agricultural products and certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) (3), and in particular Article 5 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003 provides for the possibility of issuing import licences for beef and veal products originating in Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia. However, imports must take place within the limits of the quantities specified for each of these exporting non-member countries. |
(2) |
The applications for import licences submitted between 1 and 10 August 2004, expressed in terms of boned meat, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003, do not exceed, in respect of products originating from Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia, the quantities available from those States. It is therefore possible to issue import licences in respect of the quantities applied for. |
(3) |
The quantities in respect of which licences may be applied for from 1 September 2004 should be fixed within the scope of the total quantity of 52 100 t. |
(4) |
This Regulation is without prejudice to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (4), |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The following Member States shall issue on 21 August 2004 import licences for beef and veal products, expressed as boned meat, originating in certain African, Caribbean and Pacific States, in respect of the following quantities and countries of origin:
|
United Kingdom:
|
|
Germany:
|
Article 2
Licence applications may be submitted, pursuant to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003, during the first 10 days of September 2004 for the following quantities of boned beef and veal:
Botswana: |
12 926 t, |
Kenya: |
142 t, |
Madagascar: |
7 579 t, |
Swaziland: |
3 234 t, |
Zimbabwe: |
9 100 t, |
Namibia: |
6 485 t. |
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 August 2004.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2004.
For the Commission
J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
Agriculture Director-General
(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 5.
(3) OJ L 333, 20.12.2003, p. 37. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1118/2004 (OJ L 217, 17.6.2004, p. 10).
(4) OJ L 302, 31.12.1972, p. 28. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 807/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 36).
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/19 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1457/2004
of 16 August 2004
fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,
Whereas:
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1b of Regulation (EEC) No 700/88 for a fortnightly period shall be as set out in the Annex.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 August 2004.
It shall apply from 18 to 31 August 2004.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2004.
For the Commission
J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
Agriculture Director-General
(1) OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).
(2) OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).
ANNEX
to the Commission Regulation of 16 August 2004 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
(EUR/100 pieces) |
||||
Period: from 18 to 31 August 2004 |
||||
Community producer price |
Uniflorous (bloom) carnations |
Multiflorous (spray) carnations |
Large-flowered roses |
Small-flowered roses |
|
13,42 |
10,04 |
16,33 |
8,42 |
Community import prices |
Uniflorous (bloom) carnations |
Multiflorous (spray) carnations |
Large-flowered roses |
Small-flowered roses |
Israel |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Morocco |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Cyprus |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Jordan |
— |
— |
— |
— |
West Bank and Gaza Strip |
— |
— |
— |
— |
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/21 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1458/2004
of 16 August 2004
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 implementing the Kimberley Process certification scheme for the international trade in rough diamonds
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 implementing the Kimberley Process certification scheme for the international trade in rough diamonds (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 913/2004 (2), and in particular Article 20 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 provides for the list of participants in the Kimberley Process certification scheme in Annex II to be amended. |
(2) |
The Chair of the Kimberley Process certification scheme, through his Chair’s Notice of 15 June 2004, has provided an updated list of participants in the scheme. The updating concerns the removal from the list of the Republic of Congo. Annex II should therefore be amended accordingly, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2004.
For the Commission
Christopher PATTEN
Member of the Commission
ANNEX
‘ANNEX II
List of participants in the Kimberley Process certification scheme and their duly appointed competent authorities as referred to in Articles 2, 3, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
ANGOLA
|
ARMENIA
|
AUSTRALIA
|
BELARUS
|
BOTSWANA
|
BRAZIL
|
BULGARIA
|
CANADA
|
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
|
CHINA, People’s Republic of
|
HONG KONG, Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China
|
CONGO, Democratic Republic of
|
CONGO, Republic of
|
COTE D’IVOIRE
|
CROATIA
|
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
|
GHANA
|
GUINEA
|
GUYANA
|
INDIA
|
ISRAEL
|
JAPAN
|
KOREA, Republic of
|
LAOS, People’s Democratic Republic
|
LESOTHO
|
MALAYSIA
|
MAURITIUS
|
NAMIBIA
|
NORWAY
|
ROMANIA
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
|
SIERRA LEONE
|
SINGAPORE
|
SOUTH AFRICA
|
SRI LANKA
|
SWITZERLAND
|
TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU, Separate Customs Territory
|
TANZANIA
|
THAILAND
|
TOGO
|
UKRAINE
|
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
|
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
VENEZUELA
|
VIETNAM
|
ZIMBABWE
|
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/26 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1459/2004
of 16 August 2004
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 implementing the Kimberley Process certification scheme for the international trade in rough diamonds
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 implementing the Kimberley Process certification scheme for the international trade in rough diamonds (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2004 (2), and in particular Article 20 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 provides for the list of participants in the Kimberley Process certification scheme in Annex II to be amended. |
(2) |
The Chair of the Kimberley Process certification scheme, through his Chair’s Notice of 9 July 2004, has provided an updated list of participants in the scheme. The updating concerns the removal from the list of the Republic of Congo. Annex II should therefore be amended accordingly, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2004.
For the Commission
Christopher PATTEN
Member of the Commission
(1) OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 28.
(2) See page 21 of this Official Journal.
ANNEX
‘ANNEX II
List of participants in the Kimberley Process certification scheme and their duly appointed competent authorities as referred to in Articles 2, 3, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19 and 20.
ANGOLA
|
ARMENIA
|
AUSTRALIA
|
BELARUS
|
BOTSWANA
|
BRAZIL
|
BULGARIA
|
CANADA
|
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
|
CHINA, People’s Republic of
|
HONG KONG, Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China
|
CONGO, Democratic Republic of
|
COTE D’IVOIRE
|
CROATIA
|
EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
|
GHANA
|
GUINEA
|
GUYANA
|
INDIA
|
ISRAEL
|
JAPAN
|
KOREA, Republic of
|
LAOS, People’s Democratic Republic
|
LESOTHO
|
MALAYSIA
|
MAURITIUS
|
NAMIBIA
|
NORWAY
|
ROMANIA
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
|
SIERRA LEONE
|
SINGAPORE
|
SOUTH AFRICA
|
SRI LANKA
|
SWITZERLAND
|
TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU, Separate Customs Territory
|
TANZANIA
|
THAILAND
|
TOGO
|
UKRAINE
|
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
|
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
VENEZUELA
|
VIETNAM
|
ZIMBABWE
|
Corrigenda
17.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 269/31 |
Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2004/555/EC of 15 July 2004 on the eligibility of expenditure to be incurred by certain Member States in 2004 for the collection and management of the data needed to conduct the Common Fisheries Policy
( Official Journal of the European Union L 248 of 22 July 2004 )
Annexes I and II should read as follows:
‘ANEXO I / BILAG I / ANHANG I / ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ I / ANNEX I / ANNEXE I / ALLEGATO I / BIJLAGE I / ANEXO I / BILAGA I / LIITE I / PŘÍLOHA I / LISA I / PIELIKUMS I / PRIEDAS I / I. MELLÉKLET / ANNESS I / ZAŁĄCZNIK I / PRILOGA I / PRÍLOHA I
(EUR) |
||
Estado miembro Medlemsstat Mitgliedstaat Κράτος Μέλος Member State État membre Stato membro Lidstaat Estado-Membro Medlemsstat Jäsenvaltio Členský stát Liikmesriik Dalībvalsts Valstybė narė Tagállam Stat Membru Państwo Członkowskie Država članica Členský štát |
Gastos subvencionables Støtteberettigede udgifter Erstattungsfähige Ausgaben Επιλέξιμες δαπάνες Eligible expenditure Dépenses admissibles Spese ammissibili In aanmerking komende uitgaven Despesas elegíveis Bidragsberättigande kostnader Hyväksyttävät menot Způsobilý Abikõlblikud kulud Attaisnotie izdevumi Reikalavimus atitinkančios išlaidos Támogatható kiadás Nefqa eliġibbli Wydatki kwalifikujące się Upravičeni izdatki Oprávnené náklady |
Contribución máxima de la Comunidad Fællesskabets maksimale finansielle bidrag Maximaler Gemeinschaftsbeitrag Μέγιστη κοινοτική συμμετοχή Maximum Community contribution Participation communautaire maximale Contributo max. della Comunità Maximale bijdrage van de Gemeenschap Contribuição max. da Comunidade Gemenskapens maximala bidrag Yhteisön osuus enintään Maximální výše příspěvku Společenství Maksimaalne ühenduse toetus Kopienas maksimālais ieguldījums Maksimalus Bendrijos paramos dydis Maximális közösségi hozzájárulás Kontribuzzjoni massima tal-Kumunità Maksymalny wkład Wspólnoty Maksimalni prispevek Skupnosti Maximálna výška príspevku spoločenstva |
BELGIË/BELGIQUE |
869 279 |
434 640 |
DANMARK |
4 302 350 |
2 151 175 |
DEUTSCHLAND |
2 816 800 |
1 408 400 |
ΕΛΛΑΔΑ |
1 620 564 |
810 282 |
ESPAÑA |
6 177 757 |
3 088 879 |
FRANCE |
4 616 812 |
2 308 406 |
IRELAND |
3 668 569 |
1 834 285 |
ITALIA |
3 540 473 |
1 770 237 |
NEDERLAND |
2 963 792 |
1 481 896 |
PORTUGAL |
2 699 489 |
1 349 744 |
SUOMI |
817 860 |
408 930 |
SVERIGE |
2 050 176 |
1 025 088 |
UNITED KINGDOM |
7 314 993 |
3 657 497 |
Total/I alt/Σύνολο/ Totale/Totaal/Totalt/Yhteensä |
43 458 914 |
21 729 459 |
‘ANEXO II / BILAG II / ANHANG II / ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ II / ANNEX II / ANNEXE II / ALLEGATO II / BIJLAGE II / ANEXO II / BILAGA II / LIITE II / PŘÍLOHA II / LISA II / PIELIKUMS II / PRIEDAS II / II. MELLÉKLET / ANNESS II / ZAŁĄCZNIK II / PRILOGA II / PRÍLOHA II
(EUR) |
||
Estado miembro Medlemsstat Mitgliedstaat Κράτος Μέλος Member State État membre Stato membro Lidstaat Estado-Membro Medlemsstat Jäsenvaltio Členský stát Liikmesriik Dalībvalsts Valstybė narė Tagállam Stat Membru Państwo Członkowskie Država članica Členský štát |
Gastos subvencionables Støtteberettigede udgifter Erstattungsfähige Ausgaben Επιλέξιμες δαπάνες Eligible expenditure Dépenses admissibles Spese ammissibili In aanmerking komende uitgaven Despesas elegíveis Bidragsberättigande kostnader Hyväksyttävät menot Způsobilý Abikõlblikud kulud Attaisnotie izdevumi Reikalavimus atitinkančios išlaidos Támogatható kiadás Nefqa eliġibbli Wydatki kwalifikujące się Upravičeni izdatki Oprávnené náklady |
Contribución máxima de la Comunidad Fællesskabets maksimale finansielle bidrag Maximaler Gemeinschaftsbeitrag Μέγιστη κοινοτική συμμετοχή Maximum Community contribution Participation communautaire maximale Contributo max. della Comunità Maximale bijdrage van de Gemeenschap Contribuição max. da Comunidade Gemenskapens maximala bidrag Yhteisön osuus enintään Maximální výše příspěvku Společenství Maksimaalne ühenduse toetus Kopienas maksimālais ieguldījums Maksimalus Bendrijos paramos dydis Maximális közösségi hozzájárulás Kontribuzzjoni massima tal-Kumunità Maksymalny wkład Wspólnoty Maksimalni prispevek Skupnosti Maximálna výška príspevku spoločenstva |
BELGIË/BELGIQUE |
0 |
0 |
DANMARK |
13 091 |
4 582 |
DEUTSCHLAND |
0 |
0 |
ΕΛΛΑΔΑ |
215 510 |
75 429 |
ESPAÑA |
0 |
0 |
FRANCE |
483 177 |
169 112 |
IRELAND |
109 751 |
38 413 |
ITALIA |
1 041 797 |
364 629 |
NEDERLAND |
428 683 |
150 039 |
PORTUGAL |
950 208 |
332 573 |
SUOMI |
262 959 |
92 036 |
SVERIGE |
159 719 |
55 902 |
UNITED KINGDOM |
1 798 836 |
629 593 |
Total/I alt/Σύνολο/ Totale/Totaal/Totalt/Yhteensä |
5 463 731 |
1 912 308 |