This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TB0505
Case T-505/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — Merly v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistant — Special leave for the birth of children born via surrogacy — Answer to a request for information — No act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility)
Case T-505/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — Merly v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistant — Special leave for the birth of children born via surrogacy — Answer to a request for information — No act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility)
Case T-505/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — Merly v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistant — Special leave for the birth of children born via surrogacy — Answer to a request for information — No act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility)
IO C 191, 8.6.2020, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
8.6.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 191/17 |
Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — Merly v Parliament
(Case T-505/19) (1)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistant - Special leave for the birth of children born via surrogacy - Answer to a request for information - No act adversely affecting an official - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 191/22)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Grégory Merly (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: T. Oeyen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch and C. González Argüelles, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the alleged decision of the Parliament of 30 October 2018 refusing to grant the applicant special leave, equivalent to maternity leave or to the special leave to which adopted parents are entitled.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
2. |
Mr Grégory Merly shall pay the costs. |