This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62004TA0100
Case T-100/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 March 2008 — Giannini v Commission (Public service — General competition — Non-inclusion in the reserve list — Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result — Equal treatment — Action for annulment — Action for damages)
Case T-100/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 March 2008 — Giannini v Commission (Public service — General competition — Non-inclusion in the reserve list — Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result — Equal treatment — Action for annulment — Action for damages)
Case T-100/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 March 2008 — Giannini v Commission (Public service — General competition — Non-inclusion in the reserve list — Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result — Equal treatment — Action for annulment — Action for damages)
IO C 107, 26.4.2008, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.4.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 107/23 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 March 2008 — Giannini v Commission
(Case T-100/04) (1)
(Public service - General competition - Non-inclusion in the reserve list - Irregularities in the conduct of the tests liable to distort the result - Equal treatment - Action for annulment - Action for damages)
(2008/C 107/37)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Massimo Giannini (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially, L. Lozano Palacios and M. Velardo, acting as Agents, and subsequently, G. Berscheid, acting as Agent, and M. Genton, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the selection board in Competition COM/A/9/01 with a view to constituting a reserve list for the recruitment of administrators (A7/A6) in the fields of economics and statistics (OJ 2001 C 240 A, p. 12) not to include his name on the competition reserve list, and an application for damages.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
orders the Commission to pay its own costs and three quarters of the costs of the applicant; |
|
3. |
orders the applicant to pay one quarter of its own costs. |