This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008CN0056
Case C-56/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus (Estonia) lodged on 13 February 2008 — Pärlitigu OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus
Case C-56/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus (Estonia) lodged on 13 February 2008 — Pärlitigu OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus
Case C-56/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus (Estonia) lodged on 13 February 2008 — Pärlitigu OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus
IO C 92, 12.4.2008, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
12.4.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 92/19 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus (Estonia) lodged on 13 February 2008 — Pärlitigu OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus
(Case C-56/08)
(2008/C 92/36)
Language of the case: Estonian
Referring court
Tallinna Halduskohus
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Pärlitigu OÜ
Defendant: Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus
Questions referred
(1) |
Must the Combined Nomenclature for the Common Customs Tariff which forms Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1) of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff be interpreted as meaning that frozen backbones (bones with fish meat) of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), obtained after filleting the fish, fit for human consumption and normally marketed as a foodstuff, come under
|
(2) |
If the answer to Question 1 is alternative (b), is the table in Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 85/2006 (2) of 17 January 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway void as contrary to the principle of proportionality laid down in Article 5 of the EC Treaty in so far as, according to that table, the minimum import price established for frozen salmon backbones is higher than the minimum import price for whole fish and gutted head-on fish? |