This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TA0270
Case T-270/09: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — PVS v OHIM — MeDiTA Medizinische Kurierdienst (medidata) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark medidata — Earlier national word mark MeDiTA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-270/09: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — PVS v OHIM — MeDiTA Medizinische Kurierdienst (medidata) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark medidata — Earlier national word mark MeDiTA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-270/09: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — PVS v OHIM — MeDiTA Medizinische Kurierdienst (medidata) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark medidata — Earlier national word mark MeDiTA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
IO C 317, 20.11.2010, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.11.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 317/31 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — PVS v OHIM — MeDiTA Medizinische Kurierdienst (medidata)
(Case T-270/09) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark medidata - Earlier national word mark MeDiTA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2010/C 317/56
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: PVS — Privatärztliche Verrechnungsstelle Rhein-Ruhr GmbH (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: F. Lindberg, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: MeDiTA Medizinische Kurierdienst- und Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: T. Schulte-Beckmann, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 May 2009 (Case R 1724/2007-4) relating to opposition proceedings between MeDiTA Medizinische Kurierdienst- und Handelsgesellschaft mbH and PVS — Privatärztliche Verrechnungsstelle Rhein-Ruhr GmbH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Privatärztliche Verrechnungsstelle Rhein-Ruhr GmbH to pay the costs. |