This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FA0066
Case F-66/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — AQ v European Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal report — Appraisal period 2009 — Appraiser’s grade lower than that of the holder of the post — Appraisal of performance in part of the reference period — Failure to fix objectives for the holder of the post)
Case F-66/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — AQ v European Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal report — Appraisal period 2009 — Appraiser’s grade lower than that of the holder of the post — Appraisal of performance in part of the reference period — Failure to fix objectives for the holder of the post)
Case F-66/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — AQ v European Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal report — Appraisal period 2009 — Appraiser’s grade lower than that of the holder of the post — Appraisal of performance in part of the reference period — Failure to fix objectives for the holder of the post)
IO C 232, 6.8.2011, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 232/41 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — AQ v European Commission
(Case F-66/10) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Appraisal report - Appraisal period 2009 - Appraiser’s grade lower than that of the holder of the post - Appraisal of performance in part of the reference period - Failure to fix objectives for the holder of the post)
(2011/C 232/72)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: AQ (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Massaux, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the appraisal report covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2008, in that it classified the applicant in performance level III and awarded him two promotion points.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Annuls the report appraising AQ in the appraisal and promotion period 2009 and also the decision awarding AQ two promotion points for the same period; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Commission to pay AQ the sum of EUR 2 000; |
|
3. |
Dismisses the remainder of the claims in the action; |
|
4. |
Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs. |