This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CN0521
Case C-521/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) (Austria) lodged on 12 October 2011 — Amazon.com International Sales Inc. and Others v Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Case C-521/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) (Austria) lodged on 12 October 2011 — Amazon.com International Sales Inc. and Others v Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Case C-521/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) (Austria) lodged on 12 October 2011 — Amazon.com International Sales Inc. and Others v Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft m.b.H.
IO C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 27–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
28.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 25/27 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) (Austria) lodged on 12 October 2011 — Amazon.com International Sales Inc. and Others v Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft m.b.H.
(Case C-521/11)
(2012/C 25/46)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court)
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Amazon.com International Sales Inc., Amazon EU S.à.r.l., Amazon.de GmbH, Amazon.com GmbH in liquidation, Amazon Logistik GmbH
Defendant: Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Questions referred
1. |
Can a legislative scheme be regarded as establishing ‘fair compensation’ for the purposes of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC, where
|
2. |
If Question 1 is answered in the negative:
|
3. |
If Question 1 or 2.1 is answered in the affirmative: Does it follow from Article 5 of Directive 2001/29/EC or other provisions of EU law that the right to be exercised by a collecting society to payment of fair compensation does not apply if, in relation to half of the funds received, the collecting society is required by law not to pay these to the persons entitled to compensation but to distribute them to social and cultural institutions? |
4. |
If Question 1 or 2.1 is answered in the affirmative: Does Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC or other provision of EU law preclude the right to be exercised by a collecting society to payment of fair compensation if in another Member State — possibly on a basis not in conformity with EU law — equitable remuneration for putting the media on the market has already been paid? |