This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0157
Case T-157/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2016 — Fedtke v EESC (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Purely confirmatory act — New substantive facts — Burden of proof)
Case T-157/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2016 — Fedtke v EESC (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Purely confirmatory act — New substantive facts — Burden of proof)
Case T-157/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2016 — Fedtke v EESC (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Purely confirmatory act — New substantive facts — Burden of proof)
IO C 6, 9.1.2017, p. 36–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.1.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 6/36 |
Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2016 — Fedtke v EESC
(Case T-157/16 P) (1)
((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Purely confirmatory act - New substantive facts - Burden of proof))
(2017/C 006/45)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Ingrid Fedtke (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, A. Carvajal and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and B. Wagenbäur, lawyer)
Re:
Appeal lodged against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2016, Fedtke v EESC (F-107/15, EU:2016:F:15), seeking to have that order set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Sets aside the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2016, Fedtke v EESC (F-107/15); |
|
2. |
Refers the action to a Chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled in the present appeal; |
|
3. |
Reserves the costs. |