This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TB0229
Case T-229/16: Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS — Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-229/16: Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS — Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-229/16: Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS — Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 166, 14.5.2018, p. 29–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
14.5.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 166/29 |
Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS)
(Case T-229/16) (1)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS - Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 166/38)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Duarte Pio de Bragança (Sintra, Portugal) (represented by: J. Sardinha, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Motta Veiga, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2016 (Case R 621/2015-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Duarte Pio De Bragança and Ordem de São Miguel da Ala.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |