This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0765
Case T-765/17: Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Kiku v CPVO — Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Pinova)
Case T-765/17: Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Kiku v CPVO — Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Pinova)
Case T-765/17: Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Kiku v CPVO — Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Pinova)
IO C 22, 22.1.2018, p. 56–57
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.1.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 22/56 |
Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Kiku v CPVO — Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Pinova)
(Case T-765/17)
(2018/C 022/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Kiku GmbH (Girlan, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Dresden, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before the CPVO
Proprietor of the contested plant varieties: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Plant variety at issue: Plant variety right for the apple variety ‘PINOVA’ — Certificate No EU 1298
Procedure before the CPVO: Nullity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 16 August 2017 in Case A005/2016
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order the CPVO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 20(1)(a), in conjunction with Articles 10 and 116(1), of Regulation No 2100/94. |