This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/310/33
Case T-366/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Hensotherm v OHIM — Hensel (HENSOTHERM) (Community trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Community figurative and word mark HENSOTHERM — National word mark HENSOTHERM — Inadmissibility of the appeal against the decision conferring the cancellation — Time-limits — Restitutio in integrum)
Case T-366/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Hensotherm v OHIM — Hensel (HENSOTHERM) (Community trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Community figurative and word mark HENSOTHERM — National word mark HENSOTHERM — Inadmissibility of the appeal against the decision conferring the cancellation — Time-limits — Restitutio in integrum)
Case T-366/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Hensotherm v OHIM — Hensel (HENSOTHERM) (Community trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Community figurative and word mark HENSOTHERM — National word mark HENSOTHERM — Inadmissibility of the appeal against the decision conferring the cancellation — Time-limits — Restitutio in integrum)
IO C 310, 16.12.2006, p. 17–17
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
16.12.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 310/17 |
Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2006 — Hensotherm v OHIM — Hensel (HENSOTHERM)
(Case T-366/04) (1)
(Community trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Community figurative and word mark HENSOTHERM - National word mark HENSOTHERM - Inadmissibility of the appeal against the decision conferring the cancellation - Time-limits - Restitutio in integrum)
(2006/C 310/33)
Language of the case: Swedish
Parties
Applicant: Hensotherm AB (Trelleborg, Sweden) (represented by: S. Hallbäck, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Rudolf Hensel GmbH (Börnsen, Germany) (represented by: M. Zöbisch, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 July 2004 (Case R 614/2003-1), concerning proceedings for invalidity of the Community figurative mark HENSOTHERM.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed; |
2. |
The applicant is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
3. |
The intervener is ordered to pay its own costs. |