15.1.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 9/26

A.

whereas EU issuers are required to apply international accounting standards for their consolidated financial statements,

1.

Notes that the IASCF proposes establishing a monitoring group; is of the opinion that such a monitoring group should be entitled to recommend candidates as Trustees and should be responsible for approving the selection of Trustees after an agreed nomination process;

2.

Calls for the monitoring group to be involved in setting the agenda for the IASB so as to ensure transparency and accountability; recognises that the subsequent accounting standard setting process should remain free of undue interference and should be effected in full consultation with all stakeholders, including investors;

3.

Expresses doubts as regards the desirability of setting up the monitoring group at this stage, before the second phase of the consultation process of the review of the governance of the IASB is launched and without a clear overview of the relationship to be established between the monitoring group and the IASCF in the constitution of the latter;

4.

Considers that the monitoring group should reflect the balance of the world’s most significant currency areas, cultural diversity, and the interests of both developed and emerging economies and of international institutions which have accountability requirements before public authorities; considers also that the monitoring group should play an active role in promoting the transparency of financial reporting and the development and effective functioning of capital markets, as well as avoiding pro-cyclicality and ensuring financial market stability and preventing systemic risk; takes the view that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision should be included in the monitoring group; notes with approval the proposal that the monitoring group comprise, at the outset:

5.

Deplores the fact that Parliament was not consulted about the establishment of an International Accounting Advisory Group;

6.

Considers that EU financial market regulators should also be represented in the monitoring group; stresses that no organisation should be represented in the monitoring group by more than one delegate;

7.

Stresses the complex institutional set-up of the monitoring group; emphasises the need for the monitoring group to have effective cooperation mechanisms in place so as to ensure its operability and fulfil its principal responsibilities; insists, in this context, that the members of the monitoring group have sufficient competence to ensure that they can be held politically accountable;

8.

Is concerned that some of the proposed members of the monitoring group do not require domestic issuers to apply IFRS; is of the opinion that membership of the monitoring group should become effective only after a commitment to introduce IFRS as the domestic standard; emphasises that no country should be represented in the monitoring group by more than one delegate;

9.

Notes that the IASCF also proposes enlarging the IASB by two members to a total of 16; considers such enlargement to be acceptable as it could lead to a more balanced IASB, in particular if the IASCF proposal is amended to ensure parallel treatment of the most significant global currency areas;

10.

Calls for a memorandum of understanding to be concluded between Parliament, the Council and the Commission so as to define the conditions of association of the legislators with the work of the monitoring group, if such a group is established at this stage;

11.

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the European Central Bank, and the Committee of European Securities Regulators and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.