Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62005CA0446

Case C-446/05: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles (Belgium)) — Criminal proceedings against Ioannis Doulamis (Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC — National legislation prohibiting advertising of dental care services)

SL C 116, 9.5.2008, p. 2–2 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.5.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/2


Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles (Belgium)) — Criminal proceedings against Ioannis Doulamis

(Case C-446/05) (1)

(Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC - National legislation prohibiting advertising of dental care services)

(2008/C 116/03)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles

Party in the main criminal proceedings

Ioannis Doulamis

Intervening parties: Union des Dentistes et Stomatologistes de Belgique (UPR), Jean Totolidis

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles — Interpretation of Article 81 EC, the second paragraph of Article 10 EC and Article 3(1)(g) EC — National legislation prohibiting all advertising in the dental care sector

Operative part of the judgment

Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 3(1)(g) EC and the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, does not preclude a national law, such as the Law of 15 April 1958, which prohibits any person or dental care providers, in the context of professional services or a dental surgery, from engaging in advertising of any kind in the dental care sector.


(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.


Top
  翻译: