This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010CN0056
Case C-56/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100)
Case C-56/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100)
Case C-56/10 P: Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100)
SL C 113, 1.5.2010, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
1.5.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 113/19 |
Appeal brought on 2 February 2010 by Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. against the judgment delivered on 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100)
(Case C-56/10 P)
2010/C 113/29
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Appellant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (represented by: D. Rzążewska, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
|
— |
set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07; |
|
— |
refer the case back to the General Court; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court of Justice. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The appellant pleads that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 38(2) of the Community trade mark regulation (1) by applying incorrect legal criteria when finding that the Board of Appeal was justified in requesting that a statement be submitted disclaiming exclusive rights to the figures 100 and 300.
The appellant pleads that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 7(1)(c) of the Community trade mark regulation by applying incorrect legal criteria when finding that the elements in respect of which a statement disclaiming exclusive rights was requested to be submitted are descriptive.
The appellant further pleads that the Court of First Instance infringed Article 7(1)(c), Article 38(2) or Article 76 of the Community trade mark regulation, or all of those provisions, by not taking due account of OHIM’s practice relating to the registration of signs consisting of figures or indicating the content of a publication.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1), replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).