Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TN0349

Case T-349/10: Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (OVUMCONTROL)

SL C 288, 23.10.2010, p. 53–53 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

23.10.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/53


Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (OVUMCONTROL)

(Case T-349/10)

()

(2010/C 288/98)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 June 2010 in case R 1436/2009-4;

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘OVUMCONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination to the facts in this case; in the alternative, infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.


Top
  翻译: