This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011FA0002
Case F-2/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 December 2012 — BW v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Probationary official — Not established at the end of the probationary period — Statement of reasons on which the decision to dismiss a probationary official is based — Rights of the defence)
Case F-2/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 December 2012 — BW v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Probationary official — Not established at the end of the probationary period — Statement of reasons on which the decision to dismiss a probationary official is based — Rights of the defence)
Case F-2/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 December 2012 — BW v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Probationary official — Not established at the end of the probationary period — Statement of reasons on which the decision to dismiss a probationary official is based — Rights of the defence)
SL C 38, 9.2.2013, p. 30–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.2.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 38/30 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 December 2012 — BW v Commission
(Case F-2/11) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Probationary official - Not established at the end of the probationary period - Statement of reasons on which the decision to dismiss a probationary official is based - Rights of the defence)
2013/C 38/57
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: BW (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, S. Bonté and A. Blot, lawyers, subsequently by H. Soland, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and P. Pecho, Agents, subsequently by J. Baquero Cruz, Agent)
Re:
Annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant at the end of the probationary period and compensation for the loss suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders BW to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |