This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/190/62
Case F-11/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2006 — Chassagne v Commission (Officials — Remuneration — Annual travel expenses — Provisions applicable before 1 May 2004 to officials originating from a French Overseas Department — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-11/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2006 — Chassagne v Commission (Officials — Remuneration — Annual travel expenses — Provisions applicable before 1 May 2004 to officials originating from a French Overseas Department — Manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-11/05: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2006 — Chassagne v Commission (Officials — Remuneration — Annual travel expenses — Provisions applicable before 1 May 2004 to officials originating from a French Overseas Department — Manifestly inadmissible)
ĠU C 190, 12.8.2006, p. 33–34
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
12.8.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 190/33 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2006 — Chassagne v Commission
(Case F-11/05) (1)
(Officials - Remuneration - Annual travel expenses - Provisions applicable before 1 May 2004 to officials originating from a French Overseas Department - Manifestly inadmissible)
(2006/C 190/62)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Olivier Chassagne (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and Y. Minatchy, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)
Re:
First, annulment of the decision of the Commission of the European Communities refusing the applicant the benefit of Article 8(1) to (3) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations relating to the rules on reimbursement of annual travel expenses, in the version in force before 1 May 2004, and secondly, compensation for the damage which the applicant considers to have suffered as a result of that refusal
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Each of the parties shall bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 115 of 14.5.2006 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-123/05 and transferred to the European Civil Service Tribunal by order of 15.12.2005).