Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
66,136
35,030


Apple's Pro Display XDR is five years old today, marking half a decade since its release alongside the 2019 Mac Pro.

Pro-Display-XDR-Yella.jpg

Released on December 10, 2019, the Pro Display XDR was Apple's re-entry into the high-end external monitor market, following a three-year hiatus after discontinuing the Thunderbolt Display in 2016. The announcement came at Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in June 2019, where the company presented the display as a rival to traditional reference monitors. The XDR in its name stands for "Extreme Dynamic Range," a feature that Apple emphasized as a key differentiator from other high-resolution monitors available at the time.

It features a 32-inch Retina display with a 6K resolution of 6,016 by 3,384 pixels, powered by Apple's proprietary LED backlighting system. Apple utilized blue-colored LEDs with custom lenses and reflectors to achieve a maximum brightness of up to 1,600 nits in HDR mode, while sustaining 1,000 nits across the entire screen indefinitely. This allows for what Apple describes as "stunningly accurate colors and contrast," supporting the P3 wide color gamut and delivering a claimed 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio.

The rear of the display features the same lattice pattern used on the 2019 Mac Pro, which functions as a heatsink to aid thermal management. The display is also available with matte nano-texture glass to cut down on glare—the first Apple product it's featured on.

Upon its release, the Pro Display XDR garnered significant attention for its high price. In the United States, the display starts at $4,999, and users who opt for the adjustable Pro Stand must pay an additional $999. The Pro Stand, which is sold separately, was met with mixed reactions upon its unveiling. Apple justified the cost by highlighting the engineering involved, with the Pro Stand offering height, tilt, and rotation adjustments, as well as support for both landscape and portrait modes. A VESA mount adapter is also available for those who prefer third-party mounting solutions.

As of its fifth anniversary, the Pro Display XDR remains one of only two external monitors sold by Apple, alongside the Studio Display, which was released in March 2022. Unlike the Pro Display XDR, the Studio Display comes with an integrated A13 Bionic chip, enabling features such as Center Stage for its built-in webcam, spatial audio, and support for Siri voice commands. The Pro Display XDR, however, has no webcam or any internal Apple silicon chip.

Speculation about a second-generation Pro Display XDR has been circulating for some time. In December 2022, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reported that Apple was working on an updated version of the display, this time with an Apple silicon chip to enhance its capabilities. In July 2023, Gurman reiterated that Apple was still developing multiple new displays. Display supply chain analyst Ross Young recently said that the next-generation Pro Display XDR will feature quantum dot technology, just like the latest MacBook Pro models. However, no further details have emerged regarding what other specific upgrades the Pro Display XDR might receive or a potential release time frame. For now, the Pro Display XDR remains Apple's flagship display offering.


Article Link: Apple's Pro Display XDR Is Five Years Old Today
 
Mine has aged like fine wine; it’s bewildering and sad monitor manufacturers haven’t come close besides Asus’s Pro Art PA32UCG (1000 sustained nits + 1600 Peak bit with Dolby Vision HDR however at 4K@120hz) , Asus’s upcoming mid-tier 6K monitor, and Dell’s 6k IPS black monitor that completely lacks the premium HDR expected for creative professionals.

Hopefully a successor has the same tech as the Tandem OLED panels used on the iPad Pro (later to be used on Macbook Pro OLED SKUs) paired with 120hz refresh rate via Thunderbolt 5.

Ideally VRR as well, but I’m not holding my breath.

Kudos for Apple for not including a monitor stand; long overdue for other monitor manufacturers to follow suit (with VESA mounts a more economic, efficient, flexible, and scalable way to mount a monitor)
 
Last edited:
And Apple is so kind to keep it at the same price not counting in the 5 years of inflation (that other kind of inflation) 😅
Nothing has existed unfortunately to warrant its price being decreased.

Asus PA32UCG was also $5000 MSRP but had to put their price down because they could not justify not offering 6K@60hz on a heavier and bulkier prosumer monitor that originally thought Thunderbolt + HDMI 2.1 + colorimeter w/ 4K@120hz could offset this.

Market corrected it to be priced $3000 eventually.

Other $3000 monitors don’t come close to the Pro Display XDR.

Despite DisplayPort 2:1 being available Monitor manufacturers have stagnated offering prosumer monitors at the Pro Display XDR’s level.

They just don’t bother to go for it.

This is similar to the advantages the 4090 has this GPU generation and what the Vision Pro enjoys in the spatial computing headset market.
 
Last edited:
IMG_2644.jpeg

This is the 5 year price chart from a best price portal in Switzerland. It scans all dealers and shows the lowest price at the time.
As you can see, there has been a significant price drop in the last 3 months. Wonder if this hints at a potential end of life for the current model? New display might be announced next year along with the M4 Mac Pro, potentially in June (WWDC)…
 
If you find the monitor expensive, consider paying European taxes! It would be great if Apple offered more than two monitor options, including one that matches the Mac mini in terms of budget. The €2K to €7K gap is not a budget-friendly option for me when I’m working with three screens simultaneously. It’s quite a nightmare.
 
Mac Pro 2019 is also 5 years old today
Probably the only Mac product I have somewhat buyer’s remorse; it did not age well with what Apple Silicon provided with pretty meh upgrade paths with the Apple Silicon Mac Pro SKUs thus far being underwhelming (Apple’s M2 Ultra don’t even have hardware accelerated ray-tracing; no option to use higher-end dGPUs at all anymore)
 
If you find the monitor expensive, consider paying European taxes! It would be great if Apple offered more than two monitor options, including one that matches the Mac mini in terms of budget. The €2K to €7K gap is not a budget-friendly option for me when I’m working with three screens simultaneously. It’s quite a nightmare.
The Studio Display is Apple’s budget option.

If you’re gonna work on three screens, quality thunderbolt ultrawide monitors that are far better are gonna cost $2000 anyway from the likes of LG, Dell, and so on.

High PPI is 4K for 24”, 5K for 27” and 6K for 32”; besides 4K sorta, you’re gonna pay thousands regardless to get such monitors with decent HDR and refresh rates.

Anything lower is price loss leader tactics towards low margins Apple isn’t interested in being a part of with the inventory headaches you can only resolve through black friday sale clearances they don’t want to take place in their stores.

The most versatile and highest end ultrawide monitor is technically the Vision Pro post 2.2 (32:9 and 21:9 4K ultrawide support with 5000 peak nits support and Dolby Vision!); that still is gonna cost the amount of three quality screens anyway with good reason.
 
If you find the monitor expensive, consider paying European taxes! It would be great if Apple offered more than two monitor options, including one that matches the Mac mini in terms of budget. The €2K to €7K gap is not a budget-friendly option for me when I’m working with three screens simultaneously. It’s quite a nightmare.
LG UltraFine 5K is designed with help from Apple engineers and costs much less than the Studio Display. I am using it and it's a great monitor, although the monitor stand wobbles.
 
Probably the only Mac product I have somewhat buyer’s remorse; it did not age well with what Apple Silicon provided with pretty meh upgrade paths with the Apple Silicon Mac Pro SKUs thus far being underwhelming (Apple’s M2 Ultra don’t even have hardware accelerated ray-tracing; no option to use higher-end dGPUs at all anymore)
It depends. I recently bought a Mac Pro 2019, it was ridiculously cheap (950,-) and I can now upgrade it at any time.

I make orchestral music and need a lot of memory. I've had an MBP M1 Max with 64 GB of RAM for 3 years and the memory is just not enough.
 
Probably the only Mac product I have somewhat buyer’s remorse; it did not age well with what Apple Silicon provided with pretty meh upgrade paths with the Apple Silicon Mac Pro SKUs thus far being underwhelming (Apple’s M2 Ultra don’t even have hardware accelerated ray-tracing; no option to use higher-end dGPUs at all anymore)

Presumably you made money with it? Mine was 12K... That was covered in a few months... and it was completely Tax deductible.

Out of interest what Ray tracing are you doing?

So there is a rumor Apple will have a range dGPUs of their own in the next gen Mac Pro. For graphics but also AI focused. This is from a a friend of a friend in Apple so even I am taking it with a pinch of salt but the figures quoted were more than the 109TFlops of the upcoming 5090. If it's real.. bet it ain't cheap!
 
It depends. I recently bought a Mac Pro 2019, it was ridiculously cheap (950,-) and I can now upgrade it at any time.

I make orchestral music and need a lot of memory. I've had an MBP M1 Max with 64 GB of RAM for 3 years and the memory is just not enough.

Wow! I have a hard time following this. How much Unified Memory do you think would be enough for your compositions? Would an upgrade to the M4 Pro (with access to more Unified Memory) even help you?
 
As some people said, it is worth the money, and when compared to a professional display from Eizo or Nec it isn't that expensive.
Really interested in what Eizo display do you compare it to?
 
5 years old but "same great price."

Remember when aging tech used to decline in price? Outside the Apple bubble, it still does. But inside: not only does it remain "same great price" (which means margin grows as costs fall, contributing to "another record quarter") but consumers post arguments of why it is still worth "same great price" like there is some prize in maximizing profit for the Corp.

The only one I haven't seen yet is how impressed someone is that Apple has maintained the same price while inflation has risen... which seems inevitable now that I've reminded us of how tech pricing usually works.

And how about that thousand dollar stand sold separately? Certainly it too is worth every penny, best stand of all stands, nothing from competitors competes with that stand, etc. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Apples displays are ridiculous. Small and expensive.
Ten years ago I had a 34" curved monitor. In 2019 I got a 43".

Even today Apple still doesn't sell a monitor the size I had 10 years ago.
If I was to get a new one today I'd probably aim around 50".

FWIW I work for a large public broadcaster. We produce everything from news to drama. We have thousands of Macs, yet we have zero Apple displays.
 
And it is $0 off on Apple.com or at an Apple store near you! 🤣 At least the "Pro Stand" is still only an extra $999 on top of the $5-6,000 for these displays.

To be clear, I think the price was right 5 years ago. But, they should be offering some kind of discount today.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
  翻译: