Comment pouvez-vous bénéficier de la programmation en binôme?

There is a missing piece in the description of pair programming. Pair programming is a peer review method, the same as pull requests.The difference is that is synchronous methodology. This brings an intrinsic benefit on reducing the feedback cycle during development. That then reduces waste generated due rework.

"Pair programming" as the term indicates programming when done in pair. When you include one of your peer in programming ( in coding) to create better quality code which reduces the probability of bugs/defects and makes your code more readable & hence better quality of code in less time. In Pair programming, you can resolve issues faster, reduces distractions etc. You can learn new skills, tools and techniques from your partner as well as share your knowledge & experience. You feel relaxed and can work calmly because there is another set of eyes to keep a check on the code. Your partner and you can identify each other's mistakes and support. Pair programming boost trust, collaboration, communication & helps in providing better quality code.

I have found pair programming is a key ritual when trying to promote a software craftsmanship approach to work. It is one of the most direct ways for mentors to guide mentees in software development: - mentors improve their mentorship and communication skills - mentees improve their programming and communication skills

Pair programming is a highly effective practice that enhances code quality, fosters collaboration, increases productivity, promotes better problem-solving, and boosts team morale

Pair programming in Agile Scrum offers several benefits, but here are two key advantages: 1.Improved Code Quality: With pair programming, two developers work together on the same piece of code simultaneously. This collaborative approach often results in higher-quality code. Bugs and issues are caught and resolved more quickly since they are detected by one developer while the other is actively reviewing and providing input. 2. Knowledge Sharing and Collaboration: Pair programming fosters knowledge sharing and collaboration within the team. Developers can learn from each other, share best practices, and cross-pollinate ideas and techniques.

Consider pairing with someone who complements your strengths and weaknesses. For instance, if you're strong in backend development, pairing with someone skilled in frontend can yield a holistic solution.

You should do pair rotations to make sure there are no silos inside the team, and knowledge is evenly spread. To make sure you improve over time with any team member, its good to have feedback sessions after each pairing at least at the beginning of a pairing relationship to find improvement points.

I like the Machine Gun approach: pair with ALL your team. Choose a person, pair by an entire Feature, Week or Sprint, then switch. You should be able to leave your confort zone, share and learn with and from all others.

Both the developer should have same set of skills. They should cordinate with each other on same task. Same location and same desk is mandatory. Alligned like 2 humans with one soul

In my experience, pair programming is especially useful when trying to upscale new members of the team. Of course it is useful in multiple scenarios, but the power of getting someone with a great deal of knowledge, together with someone who is just starting out and mentoring them in a one on one session on a regular basis, is an incredible thing. When we talk about creating teams that are self sustaining, and able to do great work for extended periods of time, upskilling is crucial. No matter how good the company or the team is, people are always going to leave at some point. Preparing people to fill in for more responsibilities is crucial .

Workspace: Choose a spacious desk where both participants can sit comfortably side-by-side with enough elbow room. Screen: Use a large monitor so that both can see clearly. Consider adjusting screen brightness and contrast for comfortable viewing. Keyboard and Mouse: Ensure that both are accessible to either participant, or consider having two sets, so swapping roles becomes seamless. Seating: Use adjustable chairs to cater to different heights and comfort needs.

I saw a good approach for In Situ teams by George Vagdas. For Remote teams I'll like to add the following: Try-out different desktop sharing tools and be willing to switch tools depending on your partner. Also be mindful of your local setup, avoid distractions like phones, other apps, loud or distractive music, etc. For me, Pair Programming is the closest thing to Mindfulness in programming, you need to be 200% present (100% both mentally and physically).

There are many tools for screen sharing but for me the best pair programming I've done was chair to chair as it allows a free discussion over what's going on. Some people might prefer online conferences it's all up to personal preference.

Pair programming typically involves two primary roles: the "driver" and the "navigator." Each has distinct responsibilities, and it's essential to understand these roles to ensure effective collaboration. While the exact duties might evolve or blend based on the team's preferences.

This is easier said than done. The idea of pair programming, theoretically, is very simple. The challenging part is understanding, human interactions and dynamics. Some people work very well with others. Some people really just want to work by themselves. In software development, people frequently are used to working by themselves. People need to feel like a pair programming is actually doing something beneficial for them or for the team. If it is simply an expectation to do it, then these interactions are always going to be forced, awkward, and challenging. If both parties see from a higher perspective, how this is useful, those interactions become much more natural.

This only takes in count the driver/navigator pairing modality. In reality there should be another negotiation regarding if this is the correct model. For example, ping-pong is a modality of pair programming that fits very well with TDD. Where one person writes a test and the other does the minimal code to solve it, and then improves that test or creates a new one before switching roles.

Pair programming offers numerous benefits, but it's not without its challenges. To optimize the experience and outcomes of pair programming, it's important to recognize these challenges and proactively address them. Here is a common challenge and the way to handle it: - Differing Skill Levels Challenge: One programmer might be significantly more experienced than the other, leading to potential frustrations or imbalances in contribution. Solution: Embrace the mentor-mentee dynamic. The more experienced developer can use the session as a teaching opportunity, while the less experienced developer can ask questions and seek clarification. Remember, the goal is collaborative growth.

In my experience there are two main challenges: Fatigue and Different Skill Levels. There is a ubiquitous one that can't be treated in this short format and is the tendency for Software Developers to work alone. Let's focus on the first two. Fatigue Switch (Pilot and Co-Pilot) roles frequently, I like to use the "One Pomodoro" (about 25 to 30 minutes) rule. Also use the Pomodoro Technique breaks. Different Skill Levels Pair Programming is not a teaching technique, so you should approach your parter as either a teacher or an apprentice. Staffing process should ensure that all members have the minimum level required to function on each team. But we have different levels of expertise, be patient no matter if you are low or high.

Focus should always be on the issue that happens. For example if the other person comes and says "Your code broke on line 7" then you should be specific and ask questions like: What page were you on when the code broke etc?

The first critique for PP is that is not "efficient" you have two people doing the work of one. So your primary objective must be to offer solid data to refuse that believe. Use quantitative metrics to prove higher level of qualities than solo work. Also, use qualitative metrics to check team satisfaction with the practice. In my experience, PP is often looked as an imposition not something developers firmly believe on.

You will find out soon enough if pair programming is for you or if you need another partner in programming. There is always a relationship between the programmers teaming up and whether it's a great one it will show in results.