Comment documentez-vous le code pour les parties prenantes SDLC ?

1. Ensure all coding standards and naming convention are followed. 2. Comment is available wherever required. 3. Use version control tools like GIT. 4. Technical specifications document is created for module/project developed. 5. If API is developed then open API specifications to be written with proper field level details and sample request -response 6. Make sure proper logging is done while coding which would help while debugging any issue.

Regarding documenting code for SDLC stakeholders, I strictly obey below rules:- 1. Ensure that the code is well-commented. 2. Use version control systems like Git, ClearCase, etc. 3. Include a ReadMe file with each project or repository. This should provide an overview of the project, installation instructions, and any other essential information. 4. Use diagrams to explain the system's architecture and data flow. 5. If your project has end-users, provide user manuals or guides explaining how to use the software. 6. Maintain a change log to track updates and new features.

Stakeholders can include technical experts and end users who just want to know how the product works for them. Good documentation should be clear enough for both audiences. Some key things to keep in mind are: * Stick to consistent naming conventions so everything’s easy to follow. * Use tools like Swagger UI to make API documentation simple and user-friendly. * Keep the documentation updated regularly to reflect any changes. * Organize the documentation logically (e.g., starting with setup instructions, then moving to features and functionality). * Highlight common issues or FAQs to help users troubleshoot.

Code documentation for SDLC stakeholders involves in-code comments, high-level overviews, architecture and design documentation, code structure explanations, API documentation, testing documentation, deployment guides, change logs, code review records, user manuals, performance insights, security measures, compliance documentation, maintenance guidelines, and collaborative tools. These serve the needs of developers, non-technical stakeholders, testers, operations, end-users, and various teams involved in the software development process. Clear and concise documentation enhances understanding, transparency, and effective communication throughout the SDLC.

ocumenting code for SDLC stakeholders involves using clear and consistent naming conventions. Descriptive variable and function names are crucial. Adhere to a recognized naming conventions to maintain consistency. Comments should explain the "why" behind the code. Document function signatures, including parameters and return values. Meaningful constants and organized code blocks enhance readability. Utilize version control systems with informative commit messages. Follow industry and team standards, include high-level overviews, and ensure team-wide consistency. Regularly update documentation and consider automated documentation tools. Effective code documentation simplifies collaboration ,long-term maintenance and code comprehension

Comments should also be future-compliant and carry a warning depending on the scalability. I have seen a comment on a mainframe code that said, "This select statement will not work when the database has more than 10 million records". That select statement was good when it was written but 10 years later, when I was troubleshooting a bottleneck, this comment helped me to solve the problem within the SLA.

Clear steps with video navigation is much helpful and should be updated each time in case of any changes. Jira app is good and add version control.

Depends on the system that support and company, usually i will use author-datetime format- ticket id -start , explanatory comments, closing with author-datetime format- ticket id -end

Comments are like well-placed guideposts in your code. They illuminate the intent and logic behind complex sections, aiding future developers (including yourself!). However, excessive or outdated comments create clutter, hindering readability. Focus on concise explanations that provide value and clarity. Skip commenting on the obvious. Comments are living documentation – update them as your code evolves. Maintain a consistent style for easy comprehension. This approach ensures your comments act as helpful guides, not roadblocks to understanding your code.

OpenAPI document is super useful for users. With products that publish their APIs in an official OpenAPI doc, users can do the following: 1. Autogenerate tests against the actual service (for their API consumption) 2. Safely use new versions of the API using the auto-generated tests 3. Auto-Generate SDKs to be used in scripts for CI/CD 4. Innovate - Create a CLI for the product using the SDKs and safely auto-gen the SDKs with every release 5. Innovate - create other dev tools for their needs and even contribute them back to the community. The real difficulty is generating the OAS doc for an existing project. In Go, currently, it's quite an issue. There was a library for swagger 2.0 go-swagger/go-swagger but it's not suitable for OAS 3.X.

Swagger UI and Redocly are tools that have the potential of converting plain API descriptions into a more interactive documentation hence helping developers to have a deep understanding of API endpoints, parameters as well as responses. These tools offer friendly user interfaces complemented by code examples, facilitating the integration of APIs in applications more easily.

API documentation plays a pivotal role in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) by enhancing communication between developers and stakeholders. Utilizing tools like Swagger or Postman simplifies this process. In the case of Swagger, code annotations describe API endpoints, parameters, and responses, while Swagger UI generates a user-friendly interface. Generating JSON or YAML files from code annotations further facilitates documentation. For Postman, creating collections for API requests, adding detailed information, and publishing it as a web view ensures clarity and accessibility. These tools streamline documentation, ensuring that stakeholders and developers have comprehensive, updated insights into API functionality and usage.

API documentation is a developer's roadmap to your code's functionalities. But crafting it manually? Time-consuming and error-prone, especially for evolving codebases. Tools like Doxygen, Javadoc, or Sphinx analyze comments and annotations within your code to generate comprehensive API documentation – HTML, PDF, or your preferred format – automatically. This not only saves you time but also ensures consistency and reduces the risk of outdated information. The result? Crystal-clear documentation for seamless integration, testing, debugging, and ultimately, wider adoption of your code.

Stakeholders do not need a lot of details about Code.. A high level Synopsis of the Design with Diagrams , flowcharts, Standards and Naming conventions followed help the Stake holders a long way. In-line comments in the code and Detail Design documentation of the code are supplementary documentation if a stakeholder needs to refer to or delve into details .

Enhancing user experience and reducing support costs is pivotal. User guides and tutorials serve this purpose by aiding end-users in understanding and utilizing software. It's imperative to ensure these resources are user-friendly, concise, and tailored to specific needs. Utilize visual aids such as screenshots, diagrams, or videos for clarity.

Imagine frustrated users lost in a maze of technical jargon. User guides and tutorials should be the exit signs, not another dead end. Craft clear, concise instructions tailored to user goals and scenarios. Ditch overly technical language and verbose explanations. Real-world examples, screenshots, diagrams, and even videos can illuminate the path. By prioritizing user-friendliness, you'll empower them to navigate your software with ease. This translates to happier users, fewer support tickets, and ultimately, a thriving product community.

If your delivery cycle is the Agile methodology track, then I would heavily recommend Behavior-Driven Development to help track your application behavior to your stakeholders. BDD is an agile software development approach that emphasizes collaboration and communication between developers, testers, and business stakeholders. It is a methodology that helps align technical activities with business goals and focuses on the behavior of the software from the user's perspective. In the scope of connecting documentation, the result of BDD in itself (Gherkin Test Cases), will serve as documentation of the product. The test cases in itself are written in plain English semantics and can be understood by everyone. A popular framework is Cucumber.

Compliance with documentation standards and best practices is vital for creating top-notch software documentation. These guidelines encompass various aspects such as formatting, structure, language, style, and terminology. They ensure consistency, accuracy, and quality in your documentation. Avoid using direct Stack Overflow answers, as they may lack context or clarity. Collaborate with stakeholders, technical writers, and subject matter experts to maintain excellence in your documentation, making it user-friendly and aligning with your industry's specific needs.

The ONLY place where you can reliably document code is IN the code. I have worked for almost 40 years as a software technician. I have written masses of documentation. I worked for a major bank 9 separate times and created hard copy documentation of everything........then one day, they threw it all away, for the space. That is less of a concern with soft copy. But still a concern. Adding documentation to code should occur while writing the code and fullness and accuracy of documentation are as important as for the functional code. Drawbacks to inline documentation include : It is only functional documentation and is only written by developers who lack the breadth of skills to provide a wider perspective.

Learned from my client to keep code and documentation aligned. It is really useful when there is a need to tracing back the history. We can trust the docs. On the other hands, in other company, do facing the discrepancies between code and documentation, we can't trust the documents. To align documents and code, I think the key is to make it as a habit and willing to invest the time and the willingness sometime is subjective to individual.

To document code for SDLC stakeholders, keep it clear and concise. Use comments to explain tricky parts of the code, and write a comprehensive README file covering setup, usage, and any dependencies. Include diagrams for complex processes, and ensure all documentation is easily accessible, maybe in a shared repository like Confluence or GitHub. This way, everyone stays informed and on the same page.

1. Speak the Stakeholder Language: Tailor content to each audience. Technical details for developers, while business benefits and high-level overviews for executives. 2. Standardization is King: Adopt industry best practices or internal guidelines for formatting, tone, and terminology. Consistency is key for clear understanding across teams. 3. Version Control is Vital: Treat documentation like code – use version control tools like Git to track changes, collaborate effectively, and ensure updates reflect codebase evolution. By addressing these aspects, your documentation becomes a dynamic asset, empowering stakeholders throughout the SDLC.

The primary thing is to understand the stakeholders. The core roles are generally the same, but the emphasis shifts based on the type of application (Web app, Cloud app, Game app) and technical environment. The key is recognizing documentation as a cross-disciplinary need and tailor accordingly. 1. Focus documentation on the primary personas - developers, engineering leads, product managers, QA, etc. 2. Use consistent documenting conventions - formatting, templates, diagram types, file naming Emphasize high-level architecture and flow diagrams early on for big picture understanding for non-developers. 3. Modularize documentation so stakeholders can self-navigate to their area of interest - API docs, client workflows, backend logic etc.

You can use clear comments in the code to explain what each part does. Also, create separate documents that outline the overall plan, design, and any special instructions for stakeholders to understand the software development process. Keep it simple and easy to follow!

While creating documentation to address business stakeholders, one should take the help of flowcharts to explain the business logic. Tools available - draw.io, LucidChart In addition, a confluence page describing the Problem Statement, Goal, Process, and Solution should be very well documented along with the technical documentation. For example, if creating a data warehouse, a flowchart describing the process of data ingestion, processing, and ETL pipeline would be necessary. In addition, an ERD diagram describing the data table connections would be a key input to the technical documentation.