No abstract available

[en] This report is designed to provide the management of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) with an overview of licensing actions dealing with operating power and nonpower reactors

No abstract available

No abstract available

[en] Short communication

[en] In the framework of their long-term plans to extend the capacities of their power stations, Vereinigte Elektrizitaetswerke Westfalen AG (VEW), Dortmund, and Elektromark Kommunales Elektrizitaetswerk Mark AG, Hagen, intend to construct a 1,300 MW nuclear power station on the site of the VEW Westfalen power station in Hamm-Uentrop. VEW holds 74% and Elektromark 26% of the shares of Kernkraftwerk Hamm GmbH (KKH) which has been founded for purposes of construction and operation. The nuclear power station ordered at KWU by KKH - will have a pressurized-water reactor. (orig./AK)

[en] This subject plays at present in particular a role in the course of judicial examinations of immediately enforceable orders for the partial construction licences of nuclear power plants. The author distinguishes beween three kinds of forecast decisions: 1. Appraising forecast decisions with standards of judgment taken mainly from the fields of the art, culture, morality, religion are, according to the author, only legally verifyable to a limited extent. 2. With regard to forecast decisions not arguable, e.g. where the future behaviour of persons is concerned, the same should be applied basically. 3. In contrast to this, the following is applicable for programmatic, proceedingslike, or creative forecast decisions, in particular in economics: 'An administrative estimation privilege in a prognostic sense with the consequence that the court has to accept the forecast decision which lies within the forecast margins and which cannot be disproved, and that the court may not replace this forecast decision by its own probability judgment. In these cases, administration has the right to create its own forecast standards.' Judicial control in these cases was limited to certain substantive and procedural mistakes made by the administration in the course of forecast decision finding. (orig./HP)

No abstract available

[en] This Revision 7 of the fourth edition of the NRC Staff Practice and Procedure Digest contains a digest of a number of Commission, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board, and Atomic Safety and Licensing Board decisions issued during the period from July 1, 1972 to March 31, 1987 interpreting the NRC's Rules of Practice in 10 CFR Part 2. This Revision 7 replaces in part earlier editions and supplements and includes appropriate changes reflecting the amendments to the Rules of Practice effective through March 31, 1987

[en] Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel (ALAB), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions of Rulemaking are presented in this document. The information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats: case name index, digests and headers, legal citations index, subject index, and facility index