Filters
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results 1 - 1 of 1.
Search took: 0.026 seconds
Arbekov, I. M.; Molotkov, S. N., E-mail: sergei.molotkov@gmail.com2017
AbstractAbstract
[en] The proof of the security of quantum key distribution is a rather complex problem. Security is defined in terms different from the requirements imposed on keys in classical cryptography. In quantum cryptography, the security of keys is expressed in terms of the closeness of the quantum state of an eavesdropper after key distribution to an ideal quantum state that is uncorrelated to the key of legitimate users. A metric of closeness between two quantum states is given by the trace metric. In classical cryptography, the security of keys is understood in terms of, say, the complexity of key search in the presence of side information. In quantum cryptography, side information for the eavesdropper is given by the whole volume of information on keys obtained from both quantum and classical channels. The fact that the mathematical apparatuses used in the proof of key security in classical and quantum cryptography are essentially different leads to misunderstanding and emotional discussions [1]. Therefore, one should be able to answer the question of how different cryptographic robustness criteria are related to each other. In the present study, it is shown that there is a direct relationship between the security criterion in quantum cryptography, which is based on the trace distance determining the distinguishability of quantum states, and the criterion in classical cryptography, which uses guesswork on the determination of a key in the presence of side information.
Primary Subject
Source
Copyright (c) 2017 Pleiades Publishing, Inc.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics; ISSN 1063-7761; ; CODEN JTPHES; v. 125(1); p. 50-64
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue