Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 15
Results 1 - 10 of 15.
Search took: 0.034 seconds
| Sort by: date | relevance |
[en] Purpose: To determine independent prognostic factors in a group of 1875 patients with invasive carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated with radiotherapy alone in a French cooperative study from 1970 to 1993. Materials and Methods: Patients were staged according to the UICC-FIGO and MDAH sub staging. The distribution per FIGO stage was Ia-Ib: 25.5%; IIa: 12%; IIb: 29%; IIIa: 5%; IIIb: 25%, and IV: 3.5%. Ninety-two percent had squamous cell carcinoma. The maximum diameter of the clinically detectable cervical disease was less than 3 cm in 24.5% of Stages I-II and in 10% of Stages III-IV, more than 5 cm in 13.5% of Stages I-II, and in 16% of Stages III-IV. Nodal involvement was shown on lymphangiogram in 16% of Stages I-II and in 32.5% of Stages III-IV. Results: 1) Univariate analysis of Stages I and II: stage, cervical disease diameter, and nodal involvement are significant prognostic factors. Five-year specific survival rate (5ySS) is 83.5% in Stage Ib, 81% in IIa and 71% in IIb. Five-year disease-free survival rate (5yDFS) is 86% in tumors less of 3 cm, 76% in tumors of 3 to 5 cm, and 61.5% in tumor larger than 5 cm. Lymph angiogram strongly influences the 5-year pelvic disease-free survival rate (5yPDFS): respectively, 90% in non positive lymph angiogram vs. 65% when positive. A significant drop in specific and disease-free survival is observed (10 and 14%, respectively (p = 0.04) when comparing adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Age is a significant prognostic factor for specific survival because patients aged less than 30 years old have 91% vs. about 75% for patients over 30 years (p = 0.03). 2) Univariate analysis of Stages III-IV: Stage and positive lymph angiogram are predictive factors for relapse and death. The MDAH sub staging is more reliable to predict the probability of pelvic disease-free survival in Stage III. At 5 years, the FIGO Stages IIIa and IIIb have a rather similar PDFS (65% vs. 59%). Conversely, the difference of survival rates between MDAH Stage IIIA and Stage IIIB is more demonstrative (69% vs. 47.5%). 3) Multivariate analysis (Cox P. H. R. model). Nodal involvement and stage remain significant for all three models in all stages (p < 0.0001). Age above 70 years influences specific survival for Stage I-II (p = 0.01). Tumors larger than 5 cm and adenocarcinoma also appear to be independent prognostic factors for specific and disease-free survival in Stage I-II (p = 0.05 and p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusions: The relevance of tumor size (less or greater than 4 cm) is now recognized in the 1995 revised FIGO staging in Stage Ib but unfortunately not in other stages. Tumor size per stage and nodal status should be systematically recorded to allow a better prediction of failure rates and to compare literature reports
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; ISSN 0360-3016; 
; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 38(5); p. 969-978
; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 38(5); p. 969-978
[en] Purpose: We analyzed our experience with external radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, or HDR brachytherapy alone to limited esophageal cancers. Methods and Materials: From 1991 to 1996, 25 patients with limited superficial esophagus carcinomas were treated by high dose rate brachytherapy. The mean age was 63 years (43-86 years). Five patients showed superficial local recurrence after external radiotherapy. Eleven patients without invasion of the basal membrane were staged as Tis. Fourteen patients with tumors involving the submucosa without spreading to the muscle were staged as T1. Treatment consisted of HDR brachytherapy alone in 13 patients, external radiotherapy and brachytherapy in 8 cases, and concomitant chemo- and radiotherapy in 4 cases. External beam radiation was administered to a total dose of 50 Gy using 2 Gy daily fractions in 5 weeks. In cases of HDR brachytherapy alone (13 patients), 6 applications were performed once a week. Results: The mean follow-up is 31 months (range 24-96 months). Twelve patients received 2 applications and 13 patients received 6 applications. Twelve patients experienced a failure (48%), 11/12 located in the esophagus, all of them in the treated volume. One patient presented an isolated distant metastasis. In the patients treated for superficial recurrence, 4/5 were locally controlled (80%) by brachytherapy alone. After brachytherapy alone, 8/13 patients were controlled (61%). The mean disease-free survival is 14 months (1-36 months). Overall survival is 76% at 1 year, 37% at 2 years, and 14% at 3 years. Overall survival for Tis patients is 24% vs. 20% for T1 (p 0.83). Overall survival for patients treated by HDR brachytherapy alone is 43%. One patient presented with a fistula with local failure after external radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Four stenosis were registered, two were diagnosed on barium swallowing without symptoms, and two required dilatations. Conclusion: High dose rate brachytherapy permits the treating of patients with superficial esophageal cancer with good tolerance. Early tumors, located in the mucosa, might be treated by HDR brachytherapy alone or by a combined modality treatment in which HDR brachytherapy can take place like a boost. This approach may cure localized recurrences
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; ISSN 0360-3016; ; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 46(1); p. 71-76
; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 46(1); p. 71-76
[en] Purpose: To determine, in three-dimensions, the difference between prostate delineation in magnetic resonance (MR) and computer tomography (CT) images for radiotherapy treatment planning. Patients and Methods: Three radiation oncologists, considered experts in the field, outlined the prostate without seminal vesicles both on CT, and axial, coronal, and sagittal MR images for 18 patients. To compare the resulting delineated prostates, the CT and MR scans were matched in three-dimensions using chamfer matching on bony structures. The volumes were measured and the interscan and interobserver variation was determined. The spatial difference between delineation in CT and MR (interscan variation) as well as the interobserver variation were quantified and mapped three-dimensionally (3D) using polar coordinates. A urethrogram was performed and the location of the tip of the dye column was compared with the apex delineated in CT and MR images. Results: Interscan variation: CT volumes were larger than the axial MR volumes in 52 of 54 delineations. The average ratio between the CT and MR volumes was 1.4 (standard error of mean, SE: 0.04) which was significantly different from 1 (p < 0.005). Only small differences were observed between the volumes outlined in the various MR scans, although the coronal MR volumes were smallest. The CT derived prostate was 8 mm (standard deviation, SD: 6 mm) larger at the base of the seminal vesicles and 6 mm (SD 4 mm) larger at the apex of the prostate than the axial MRI. Similar figures were obtained for the CT and the other MRI scans. Interobserver variation: The average ratio between the volume derived by one observer for a particular scan and patient and the average volume was 0.95, 0.97, and 1.08 (SE 0.01) for the three observers, respectively. The 3D pattern of the overall observer variation (1 SD) for CT and axial MRI was similar and equal to 3.5 to 2.8 mm at the base of the seminal vesicles and 3 mm at the apex. Conclusion: CT-derived prostate volumes are larger than MR derived volumes, especially toward the seminal vesicles and the apex of the prostate. This interscan variation was found to be larger than the interobserver variation. Using MRI for delineation of the prostate reduces the amount of irradiated rectal wall, and could reduce rectal and urological complications
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; ISSN 0360-3016; ; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 43(1); p. 57-66
; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 43(1); p. 57-66
[en] Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the experience of Centre GF Leclerc for conservative and curative treatment by radiotherapy of low rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 151 patients received radiotherapy alone for rectal adenocarcinoma with curative intent. They were clinically staged according to size (T1 < 3 cm, and T2 > 3 cm) and depth of infiltration (A = superficial, and B = impaired mobility and T3 fixed). Over the past 6 years, rectal ultrasound (US) has been used systematically, compared with computed tomographic scan and magnetic resonance imaging when needed. Intracavitary contact X ray was given to 129 patients (69%), and brachytherapy in 45 of 151. External radiotherapy was used in 34 cases (22.5%). Results: Complete response was obtained in 93%. Local failures were observed in 50 cases (28%); two occurred in pelvic nodes after intracavitary X rays. Size (tumors > 3 cm) and alteration of mobility significantly influenced the rate of local failure (p = 0.009 and 0.007). The addition of external radiotherapy in patients with poor prognostic factors improved the local control rate. A total of 39 patients with recurrence were amenable to salvage surgery. After salvage treatment, the local control rate was 82% with unlimited follow-up. The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 57%, with a specific survival of 66%. There was no difference in local control or survival according to differentiation of the tumors and distance between anal margin and the inferior level of the lesion. Severe late effect (grade 3) was 3.8%. The sphincter preservation was obtained in 104 of 124 cases (84%). The sphincter function was judged to normal in 102 of 104 patients (98%). Conclusion: Intracavitary contact X ray is the treatment of choice for clinical Stage T1A rectal tumors. External radiotherapy significantly improved the results of treatment of tumors > 3 cm. Clinical staging and transrectal ultrasound allows a safe selection of indications. Radiotherapy alone may be proposed for selected cases as an alternative to mutilating surgery for small rectal adenocarcinoma
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; ISSN 0360-3016; ; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 40(5); p. 1077-1085
; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 40(5); p. 1077-1085
[en] Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the predictive factors of complications, to evaluate the impact of customized treatment planning on late normal tissue effects per stage, and to report disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) rates. Methods and Materials: From 1970 to 1994, 642 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone for carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) substaging, 34% were Stage I, 39% Stage II, and 27% Stage III. The analysis was divided into three periods: 1970-1978 (use of standard prescriptions),1979-1984 (implementation of individual adjustments), 1985-1994 (systematic individual adjustments). Five-year DFS, LC, and complications rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictive factors of complications were determined by univariate analysis using frequency tables and nonparametric t-tests. Multivariate analysis consisted of a polychotomous stepwise regression. Results: The comparison of the three time periods showed a significant reduction of the external radiation dose (dose above 40 Gy in 47% of patients before 1979 vs. 36% after 1984), of the use of parametrial boost (55% vs. 39%), of the use of vaginal cylinder (28% vs. 11.5%), and of the HWT volume (combined intracavitary and external irradiation) (842 cc vs. 503 cc on average). The total sequelae/complications rate, all toxicity grades, all stages, all organs was 51%. Five-year actuarial rate per toxicity grade was: G1, 42%; G2, 23.5%; G3, 10%; G4, 3%. The three main predictive factors for rectal and bladder sequelae/complications (all toxicity grades) taking into account time period were: the increase of external radiation dose, the high dose rate at reference points, and the whole vagina brachytherapy. No G4 occurred in the third period. The rate of G3 complications dropped from 16% to 6% over time: from 5% during the first period to 0% during the third period in Stage I, from 8% to 6% in Stage II, and from 23% to 12% in Stage III. G3 currently describes a variety of clinical situations with a different impact on quality of life which justifies further refinements of definitions of late effects. In our experience the severity of G3 markedly decreased: less than one-third of G3 had a real impact on quality of life in the last period compared to more than two-thirds in the first period. Meanwhile, 5-year LC rates remained stable in Stages I and II, 91% and 85% respectively. Conversely they fell from 75% to 55% in Stage III, thus raising the problem of underdosage and/or more accurate staging with time. Conclusions: Customized treatment planning eradicated lethal complications and provided a significant decrease of G3 in all stages while maintaining high cure rates in early stages. Dose reduction should be considered with caution in Stage III
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; ISSN 0360-3016; ; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 48(1); p. 189-200
; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 48(1); p. 189-200
[en] Introduction: We report a retrospective study on the analysis of the operative specimen after preoperative radiotherapy for FIGO (1971) stage I or II endometrial carcinoma. Methods and Materials: From 1976 to 1996, 221 patients were treated with external radiotherapy (XRT) and/or low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) followed by surgery (S). Patients with cervical involvement (89 patients) or with high-grade tumors (49 patients) received XRT and BT. Patients stage FIGO Ia (89 patients) or with low-grade tumors (57 patients) received BT alone. Surgery was performed 5 to 6 weeks after irradiation. Results: The mean follow-up is 78 months (12-216). The 5-year survival was 90% for FIGO Ia, 80% for FIGO Ib, and 84% for FIGO II (p 0.51). According to the differentiation, 5-year survival was 87% for grade 1, 84% for grade 2, 84% for grade 3 (p = 0.10). Grade 3 complications were registered in 2% (no grade 4). The tumors were sterilized in 37 patients (17%), sterilized but with dystrophic glands in 34 patients (16%), only modified and altered in 21 patients (9.5%), with viable cells in 56 patients (26%). After preoperative radiotherapy, 37/148 specimens were sterilized (25%), 14/74 after brachytherapy and surgery (19%), 23/74 after external radiotherapy-brachytherapy and surgery (31%). According to the response of the specimen, 5-year survival was 87% when the tumor was sterilized, 96% when altered glands were present, 85% when modified, and 76% if residual tumor with viable cells was identified (p = 0.043). Conclusion: Preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery is a safe and effective treatment of FIGO stage I or II endometrial carcinomas. BT with two uterine tubes seems to be of interest in the contribution of the treatment of the uterus to sterilize the specimen. The analysis of this new prognostic factor remains important to select a population with worst prognosis
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; ISSN 0360-3016; ; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 41(3); p. 551-557
; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 41(3); p. 551-557
[en] Purpose/objective: Whole “conventional” pelvic irradiation (up to 45–50 Gy) following hysterectomy is associated with a high rate of adverse gastro-intestinal (GI) adverse events, of which around 60% correspond to acute grade 2 toxicity. The phase II RTCMIENDOMETRE trial was designed to test the hypothesis that IMRT could reduce the incidence of grade 2 or more acute GI toxicity to less than 30% in patients irradiated post-operatively for an endometrial cancer. Materials/methods: Patients with post-operative stage Ib G3, Ic or II endometrial carcinomas with no history of chronic inflammatory bowel disease were eligible. Guidelines for volume delineation and dose prescription were detailed in the protocol. The investigators were advised to use a web-based atlas developed for the RTOG 0418 study. The dose of the vaginal and nodal PTV was 45 Gy in 25 fractions. To assess the ability of the participating centres to comply with the protocol guidelines, they were requested to complete a dummy run procedure before inclusion of their 1st patient. GI and genito-urinary (GU) toxicity were graded according to the CTCAE V 3.0 classification and were prospectively recorded every week during irradiation, as well as at time of brachytherapy insertions and during the follow-up visit at week 15 (W15). Special attention was given to note any changes to the grade of adverse events between W5 and W15. Results: From May 2008 to April 2010, 49 patients from 6 centres were recruited for the trial. One patient could not be treated, one patient died of vascular stroke at W3 without toxicity, and 1 patient refused to be followed-up after treatment. Thus, 46 cases were available for analysis at W15. The distribution by stage was as follows: Ib 16.3%, Ic 64.2%, II 20.4%. Thirty six patients (75%) received an additional vaginal vault boost of 6–10 Gy delivered by HDR brachytherapy in 1 or 2 fractions. Among the 47 patients who completed IMRT, 27% (95% CI 14.5–39.7%) developed at least 1 GI grade 2 adverse event (diarrhoea in 92% of cases), which mainly occurred at W4 and W5. No event corresponding to grade 3 or above was recorded. At W15, the number of patients complaining about GI events was low: 5 patients complained about persistent grade 1 diarrhoea, and 4 patients complained about haemorrhoids. Nineteen percent (95% CI 8.9–32.6%) of patients experienced grade 2 cystitis or urinary frequency which had disappeared by W15. Conclusion: In accordance with our hypothesis, post-operative IMRT resulted in a low rate (less than 30%) of acute GI grade 2 toxicity, in patients with endometrial carcinomas. At W15, no patient demonstrated a grade 2 adverse event, and the prevalence of remaining grade 1 events was less than 20%
Journal
[en] The Sonarray ultrasound system is a non-invasive technique allowing real-time prostate localization. Since 2003, it has been used in our department before intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. We reported both setup errors and organ motion detected by Sonarray system and the accuracy of this ultrasound imaging dedicated to radiotherapy
Journal
| 1 | 2 | Next |