AbstractAbstract
[en] Purpose: To assess the long-term outcome of conventional external beam radiation therapy in the management of clinically confined prostate cancer and to examine the proposition that radiation accelerates tumor growth in those who fail treatment. Methods and Materials: One thousand and forty-four men with T1-4NxM0 prostate cancer treated by conventional external beam radiation therapy at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 1977 and 1991 were analyzed. Median follow-up was 49 months. Failure was defined as: two sequential rises in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level; or a PSA > 1 ng/ml 2 or more years after radiation; or any clinical failure. Kaplan-Meier actuarial analyses were used to assess outcome. Results: At 10 years only 40% of the T1-2 group remained disease free. When subdivided by grade, the well-differentiated tumors (Gleason 1-2) exhibited a 53% actuarial 10-year disease-free survival, moderately differentiated (Gleason 3) 42%, and poorly differentiated (Gleason 4-5) 20%. The corresponding values for the T3-4 men were 33% for Gleason 1-2, 20% for Gleason 3, and 10% for Gleason 4-5. Overall the value for T3-4 tumors was 18% at 10 years. On relapse the median PSA doubling times for the T1-2 patients were predicted by histology: 18.8 months for Gleason 1-2 patients; 11.1 months for Gleason 3; and 9.6 months for Gleason 5. Significant differences were found between the Gleason 3 and the Gleason 4-5 groups (p = 0.04) and the Gleason 1-2 and the Gleason 4-5 groups (p = 0.03). A wide range of doubling times was seen within each grade group. When compared with recently reported data on selected T1-2 patients who were managed by expectant observation there was no advantage over the first decade (and certainly no disadvantage) in terms of metastasis-free survival or disease-specific survival for the irradiated Gleason 1-3 patients. However, a gain was seen for those with Gleason 4-5 tumors. Conclusion: Less than half of the T1-2NxM0 and less than one-fifth of the T3-4NxM0 patients receiving conventional radiation therapy were biochemically disease free at 10 years. The PSA doubling times on relapse show a wide variation. Grade was important in determining the rate of relapse suggesting that radiation does not induce a homogeneous acceleration of prostate tumors. A metastasis-free and disease-specific survival advantage was found for the poorly differentiated tumors when compared with similar patients reported in the literature who were managed initially by observation
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Copyright (c) 1995 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; ISSN 0360-3016; ; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 32(2); p. 287-292
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Purpose: We performed a retrospective analysis to assess the durability of benefit derived from irradiation after prostatectomy for pT3N0 disease, and the possibility of cure. Methods and Materials: We studied 88 patients who were irradiated after prostatectomy and had available prostate specific antigen (PSA) data, no known nodal or metastatic disease, no hormonal treatment, and follow-up of at least 12 months from surgery. Forty patients received adjuvant therapy for a high risk of local failure with undetectable PSA. Forty-eight patients received salvage therapy for elevated PSA levels. Mean follow up was 44 months from date of surgery and 31 months from irradiation. Biochemical failure was strictly defined as a confirmed rise in PSA of > 10%, or as the ability to detect a previously undetectable PSA value. Results: After salvage irradiation, 69% of patients attained an undetectable PSA. Eighty-eight percent of adjuvant patients were biochemically and clinically free of disease (bNED) at 3 years from prostatectomy. Sixty-eight percent of those receiving salvage irradiation were bNED 3 years after surgery. On univariate analysis, treatment group (adjuvant or salvage), pre-operative PSA, and the status of seminal vesicles were significant prognostic factors. The extent of PSA elevation in the salvage group was also significant. We did not demonstrate a significant difference between those salvage patients referred for persistently elevated PSA as compared to those with a late rise in PSA. On multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of outcome was treatment group, with adjuvant irradiation having better outcome than salvage. Conclusion: More than two-thirds of this group of patients remain biochemically disease free at 3 years following irradiation, attesting to a number of potential cures. For patients with stage pT3N0 prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, our data support the use of either routine postoperative adjuvant irradiation or close PSA follow-up with early salvage treatment
Primary Subject
Source
S0360301697000801; Copyright (c) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: Argentina
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; ISSN 0360-3016; ; CODEN IOBPD3; v. 38(4); p. 731-736
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue