Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 42
Results 1 - 10 of 42.
Search took: 0.036 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
Gerber, M.S.
Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)1997
Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)1997
AbstractAbstract
[en] In May 1997, a historic deactivation project at the PUREX (Plutonium URanium EXtraction) facility at the Hanford Site in south-central Washington State concluded its activities (Figure ES-1). The project work was finished at $78 million under its original budget of $222.5 million, and 16 months ahead of schedule. Closely watched throughout the US Department of Energy (DOE) complex and by the US Department of Defense for the value of its lessons learned, the PUREX Deactivation Project has become the national model for the safe transition of contaminated facilities to shut down status
Primary Subject
Source
25 Nov 1997; 250 p; CONTRACT AC06-96RL13200; ALSO AVAILABLE FROM OSTI AS DE99050364; NTIS; US GOVT. PRINTING OFFICE DEP
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
GERBER, M.S.
Fluor Hanford, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) (United States)2004
Fluor Hanford, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) (United States)2004
AbstractAbstract
[en] A long and intense effort to stabilize and repackage nearly 18 metric tons (MT) of plutonium-bearing leftovers from defense production and nuclear experiments concluded successfully in February, bringing universal congratulations to the Department of Energy's Hanford Site in southeast Washington State. The victorious stabilization and packaging endeavor at the Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP), managed and operated by prime contractor Fluor Hanford, Inc., finished ahead of all milestones in Hanford's cleanup agreement with regulators, and before deadlines set by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB), a part of the federal Executive Branch that oversees special nuclear materials. The PFP stabilization and packaging project also completed under budget for its four-year tenure, and has been nominated for a DOE Secretarial Award. It won the Project of the Year Award in the local chapter competition of the Project Management Institute, and is being considered for awards at the regional and national level
Primary Subject
Source
HNF--20159-FP; AC06-96RL13200; To be published in the May/June 2004 issue of Radwaste Solutions Magazine
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Radwaste Solutions; ISSN 1529-4900; ; (Feb2004issue); [10 p.]
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Gerber, M.S.
Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1993
Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1993
AbstractAbstract
[en] This report discusses the following topics: Memories of War: Pearl Harbor and the Genesis of the Hanford Site; safety has always been promoted at the Hanford Site; women have an important place in Hanford Site history; the boom and bust cycle: A 50-year historical overview of the economic impacts of Hanford Site Operations on the Tri-Cities, Washington; Hanford's early reactors were crucial to the sites's history; T-Plant made chemical engineering history; the UO3 plant has a long history of service. PUREX Plant: the Hanford Site's Historic Workhorse. PUREX Plant Waste Management was a complex challenge; and early Hanford Site codes and jargon
Primary Subject
Source
Oct 1993; 58 p; CONTRACT AC06-87RL10930; Also available from OSTI as DE94005973; NTIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
GERBER, M.S.
FH (US). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) (United States)2002
FH (US). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM) (United States)2002
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Source
1 Apr 2002; 8 p; American Chemical Society Annual Meeting; Orlando, FL (United States); 4 Aug 2002; AC--06-96RL13200; Available from PURL: https ://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/807933-68Bc7N/native/
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Gerber, M.S.
Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)1996
Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)1996
AbstractAbstract
[en] The Hanford Site was founded in early 1943 for the top secret government mission of producing plutonium for the world's first atomic weapons. A great deal of land was needed, both to separate various Site facilities from each other, and to provide buffer zones for safety and security purposes. In total, 640 square miles were occupied by the original Hanford Site and its buffer zones. Much of this land had been earmarked for inclusion in the Columbia Basin Irrigation Project (CBP). After World War II ended, a series of national decisions led to a long-term mission for the Hanford Site, and area residents learned that the Site lands they had hoped to farm would be withheld from agricultural production for the foreseeable future. A long set of negotiations commenced between the federal management agency responsible for Hanford (the Atomic Energy Commission -- AEC), and the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), Department of the Interior that managed the CBP. Some lands were turned back to agriculture, and other compromises made, in the Site's far northern buffer lands known as the Wahluke Slope, during the 1950s. In the mid-1960s, further negotiations were about to allow farming on lands just north of the Columbia River, opposite Hanford's reactors, when studies conducted by the BOR found drainage barriers to irrigation. As a result of these findings, two wildlife refuges were created on that land in 1971. Today, after the Hanford Site plutonium production mission has ended and as Site cleanup goes forward, the possibility of total release of Wahluke Slope lands from the control of the Department of Energy (DOE -- a successor agency to the AEC) is under discussion. Such discussion encompasses not just objective and clearly visible criteria, but it resurrects historical debates about the roles of farming and government presence in the Columbia Basin
Primary Subject
Source
16 Apr 1996; 17 p; Pacific Northwest history conference; Corvallis, OR (United States); 18-20 Apr 1996; CONF-9604252--; CONTRACT AC06-96RL13200; ALSO AVAILABLE FROM OSTI AS DE99050390; NTIS; US GOVT. PRINTING OFFICE DEP
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
GERBER, M.S.
Fluor Hanford, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (United States)2004
Fluor Hanford, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (United States)2004
AbstractAbstract
[en] Removing the largest collection of radioactive materials bordering the Columbia River at the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Hanford Site in southeast Washington state was successfully completed on a glorious autumn morning in 2004. The Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Project, managed for DOE by prime contractor Fluor Hanford, removed more than 2,300 tons (2,100 metric tons [MT]) of irradiated uranium fuel--just over 4.65-million pounds--from a historic reactor area along the river's shore, called the ''Hanford Reach.'' The Project also dried the fuel and placed all of it in safe, dry, interim storage in central Hanford, nine miles from the Columbia and hundreds of feet above the groundwater table, effectively neutralizing the risks formerly posed by the decaying fuel. Removing the nearly 105,000 irradiated, solid metal uranium fuel assemblies--stored for decades underwater in the aging K Basins--marked a cornerstone event in Hanford's long farewell to arms. It was the third major triumph in a ''trifecta'' year at the old site, during which a Fluor Hanford-managed project completed stabilizing and safely packaging nearly 20 tons of plutonium-bearing materials, and another project finished pumping all liquids out of degrading, underground waste tanks. All three successful projects give traction to the vision and promise of DOE's Richland Operations Office (RL), to move wastes and special nuclear material away from the river and into Hanford's Central plateau
Primary Subject
Source
HNF--22996; AC06-96RL13200
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Radwaste Solutions; ISSN 1529-4900; ; (Oct2004issue); p. 34
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Gerber, M.S.
Hanford Site, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (United States)2009
Hanford Site, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management (United States)2009
AbstractAbstract
[en] The power point presentation describes the status of Hanford's B Reactor as U.S. National Historic Landmark
Primary Subject
Source
8 Apr 2009; 29 p; Open World Forum Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL); Richland, WA (United States); 17-20 Mar 2009; AC06-96RL13200; Also available from OSTI as DE00951760; PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/951760-6ULsYm/
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Gerber, M.S.
Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1994
Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1994
AbstractAbstract
[en] This report discusses deactivation work which was completed as of March 31, 1994 at the 308 Fuels Development Laboratory (FDL) at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. The decision to deactivate the structure, formerly known as the Plutonium Fabrication Pilot Plant (PFPP), was driven by a 1980s Department of Energy (DOE) decision that plutonium fuels should not be fabricated in areas near the Site's boundaries, as well as by changing facility structural requirements. Inventory transfer has been followed by the cleanout and stabilization of plutonium oxide (PuO2) and enriched uranium oxide (UO2) residues and powders in the facility's equipment and duct work. The Hanford Site, located in southeastern Washington state, was one of America's primary arsenals of nuclear defense production for nearly 50 years beginning in World War II. Approximately 53 metric tons of weapons grade plutonium, over half of the national supply and about one quarter of the world's supply, were produced at Hanford between 1944 and 1989. Today, many Site buildings are undergoing deactivation, a precursor phase to decontamination and decommissioning (D ampersand D). The primary difference between the two activities is that equipment and structural items are not removed or torn down in deactivation. However, utilities are disconnected, and special nuclear materials (SNM) as well as hazardous and pyrophoric substances are removed from structures undergoing this process
Primary Subject
Source
Mar 1994; 10 p; CONTRACT AC06-87RL10930; Also available from OSTI as DE94010376; NTIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
ACTINIDES, CONTROLLED ATMOSPHERES, ELEMENTS, ENERGY SOURCES, FUEL ELEMENTS, FUELS, INERT ATMOSPHERE, LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, METALS, NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, REACTOR COMPONENTS, REACTOR MATERIALS, REACTORS, RESEARCH AND TEST REACTORS, TEST FACILITIES, TRANSURANIUM ELEMENTS, US DOE, US ORGANIZATIONS
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
GERBER, M.S.
Fluor Hanford, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (United States)2003
Fluor Hanford, Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (United States)2003
AbstractAbstract
[en] Fluor Hanford, Inc. is pleased to submit the K Basins Fuel Transfer System (FTS) for consideration by the Project Management Institute as Project of the Year for 2003. The FTS involved installing a unique, unproven system in an inhospitable and deteriorating radiological and hazardous environment, under very stringent requirements and within an extremely condensed schedule, just 19 months, from authorization to full operations. The FTS, therefore, is an excellent example of effective project management, and the dynamic involvement of an integrated team representing a broad spectrum of personnel, disciplines, and services. The FTS is an integral and critical part of a larger project at Hanford -the Spent Nuclear Fuel Project (SNF). The mission of the SNF Project is to relocate used, or spent, nuclear fuel to safe interim storage, permanently dispose of radioactive debris in the K-Basins, and deactivate all related facilities and prepare them for demolition. Today, the FTS is being used to remove highly radioactive nuclear fuel from an aging, and potentially unstable storage in underground pools of water--the K-Basins--and safely transport it to a processing area to be cleaned, dried and sent to safe storage. The role the FTS plays in successfully completing the mission of the SNF Project is concrete evidence of the intrinsic value of project management and a testimonial to the innovation, ingenuity, and teamwork of many--from workers to management and subcontractors, and regulators to stakeholders. It's a true success story and one that will have a happy ending, safely eliminating the risk of potentially contaminating one of Washington state's most valuable natural resources, the Columbia River. This nomination is dedicated to that Project Team
Primary Subject
Source
29 Jan 2003; 32 p; AC06-96RL13200; Available from PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/812308-9vuK5S/native/
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Gerber, M.S.
Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1993
Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1993
AbstractAbstract
[en] This document thoroughly examines the role that the Hanford Engineer Works played in the Manhattan project. The historical aspects of the buildings and facilities are characterized. An in depth look at the facilities, including their functions, methods of fabrication and appearance is given for the 100 AREAS, 200 AREAS, 300 AREAS, 500, 800 and 900 AREAS, 600 AREA, 700 AREA, 1100 AREA and temporary construction structures
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Sep 1993; 424 p; CONTRACT AC06-87RL10930; Also available from OSTI as DE94001239; NTIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
1 | 2 | 3 | Next |