Jain, Srishti; Sharma, Sudhir Kumar; Choudhary, Nikki; Masiwal, Renu; Saxena, Mohit; Sharma, Ashima; Mandal, Tuhin Kumar; Gupta, Anshu; Gupta, Naresh Chandra; Sharma, Chhemendra, E-mail: sudhir.npl@nic.in, E-mail: sudhircsir@gmail.com2017
AbstractAbstract
[en] The present study investigated the comprehensive chemical composition [organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), water-soluble inorganic ionic components (WSICs), and major & trace elements] of particulate matter (PM2.5) and scrutinized their emission sources for urban region of Delhi. The 135 PM2.5 samples were collected from January 2013 to December 2014 and analyzed for chemical constituents for source apportionment study. The average concentration of PM2.5 was recorded as 121.9 ± 93.2 μg m−3 (range 25.1–429.8 μg m−3), whereas the total concentration of trace elements (Na, Ca, Mg, Al, S, Cl, K, Cr, Si, Ti, As, Br, Pb, Fe, Zn, and Mn) was accounted for ∼17% of PM2.5. Strong seasonal variation was observed in PM2.5 mass concentration and its chemical composition with maxima during winter and minima during monsoon seasons. The chemical composition of the PM2.5 was reconstructed using IMPROVE equation, which was observed to be in good agreement with the gravimetric mass. Source apportionment of PM2.5 was carried out using the following three different receptor models: principal component analysis with absolute principal component scores (PCA/APCS), which identified five major sources; UNMIX which identified four major sources; and positive matrix factorization (PMF), which explored seven major sources. The applied models were able to identify the major sources contributing to the PM2.5 and re-confirmed that secondary aerosols (SAs), soil/road dust (SD), vehicular emissions (VEs), biomass burning (BB), fossil fuel combustion (FFC), and industrial emission (IE) were dominant contributors to PM2.5 in Delhi. The influences of local and regional sources were also explored using 5-day backward air mass trajectory analysis, cluster analysis, and potential source contribution function (PSCF). Cluster and PSCF results indicated that local as well as long-transported PM2.5 from the north-west India and Pakistan were mostly pertinent.
Primary Subject
Source
Copyright (c) 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Environmental Science and Pollution Research International; ISSN 0944-1344; ; v. 24(17); p. 14637-14656
Country of publication
ASIA, CHEMICAL REACTIONS, COLLOIDS, DATA ANALYSIS, DATA PROCESSING, DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, DISPERSIONS, ENERGY SOURCES, FUELS, HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS, MEMBRANE PROTEINS, ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, OXIDATION, OXYGEN COMPOUNDS, PARTICLES, PROCESSING, PROTEINS, RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, SOLS, STORMS, THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES, VARIATIONS
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL
Jain, Srishti; Sharma, Sudhir Kumar; Srivastava, Manoj Kumar; Chaterjee, Abhijit; Singh, Rajeev Kumar; Saxena, Mohit; Mandal, Tuhin Kumar, E-mail: sudhir.npl@nic.in, E-mail: sudhircsir@gmail.com2019
AbstractAbstract
[en] The present work is the ensuing part of the study on spatial and temporal variations in chemical characteristics of PM10 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 μm) over Indo Gangetic Plain (IGP) of India. It focuses on the apportionment of PM10 sources with the application of different receptor models, i.e., principal component analysis with absolute principal component scores (PCA-APCS), UNMIX, and positive matrix factorization (PMF) on the same chemical species of PM10. The main objective of this study is to perform the comparative analysis of the models, obtained mutually validated outputs and more robust results. The average PM10 concentration during January 2011 to December 2011 at Delhi, Varanasi, and Kolkata were 202.3 ± 74.3, 206.2 ± 77.4, and 171.5 ± 38.5 μg m−3, respectively. The results provided by the three models revealed quite similar source profile for all the sampling regions, with some disaccords in number of sources as well as their percent contributions. The PMF analysis resolved seven individual sources in Delhi [soil dust (SD), vehicular emissions (VE), secondary aerosols (SA), biomass burning (BB), sodium and magnesium salt (SMS), fossil fuel combustion, and industrial emissions (IE)], Varanasi [SD, VE, SA, BB, SMS, coal combustion, and IE], and Kolkata [secondary sulfate (Ssulf), secondary nitrate, SD, VE, BB, SMS, IE]. However, PCA-APCS and UNMIX models identified less number of sources (besides mixed type sources) than PMF for all the sampling sites. All models identified that VE, SA, BB, and SD were the dominant contributors of PM10 mass concentration over the IGP region of India.
Primary Subject
Source
Copyright (c) 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (Print); ISSN 0090-4341; ; CODEN AECTC; v. 76(1); p. 114-128
Country of publication
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS, CHALCOGENIDES, CHEMICAL REACTIONS, COLLOIDS, DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS, DISPERSIONS, ENERGY SOURCES, FLUID MECHANICS, FOSSIL FUELS, FUELS, MATERIALS, MATHEMATICS, MECHANICS, MEMBRANE PROTEINS, MONITORING, NITROGEN COMPOUNDS, ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, OXIDATION, OXYGEN COMPOUNDS, PARTICLES, POLLUTION, PROTEINS, RARE EARTH COMPOUNDS, RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, SAMARIUM COMPOUNDS, SOLS, STATISTICS, SULFIDES, SULFUR COMPOUNDS, THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
External URLExternal URL