[en] This document is the second of 2 companion appropriate use criteria (AUC) documents developed by the American College of Cardiology, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The first document (J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1647-1672) addresses the evaluation and use of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, whereas this document addresses this topic with regard to structural (nonvalvular) heart disease. While dealing with different subjects, the 2 documents do share a common structure and feature some clinical overlap. The goal of the companion AUC documents is to provide a comprehensive resource for multimodality imaging in the context of structural and valvular heart disease, encompassing multiple imaging modalities.

Using standardized methodology, the clinical scenarios (indications) were developed by a diverse writing group to represent patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included common applications and anticipated uses. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Practice Guidelines.

A separate, independent rating panel scored the 102 clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario.

The primary objective of the AUC is to provide a framework for the assessment of these scenarios by practices that will improve and standardize physician decision making. AUC publications reflect an ongoing effort by the American College of Cardiology to critically and systematically create, review, and categorize clinical situations in which diagnostic tests and procedures are utilized by physicians caring for patients with cardiovascular diseases. The process is based on the current understanding of the technical capabilities of the imaging modalities examined.

[en] The purpose of this study is to explore the predictors of moderate to severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) after myocardial infarction with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). From January 2016 to September 2018, 109 patients (mean age 60 ± 8 years) with IMR were studied retrospectively. All patients underwent CMR-cine with True-FISP sequence and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) with a phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequence. The presence of papillary muscle infarction (PMI), global left ventricular (LV) infarcted extent, LV functional parameters, and LV myocardial strain were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors in the development of moderate to severe IMR. Mild IMR was present in 61 patients (56%), and moderate to severe IMR was present in 48 patients (44%). PMI was identified in 22 patients (20.1%); 14 of them (63.63%) showed a moderate or severe IMR. Global LV infarcted extent was increased in patients with moderate to severe IMR (p < 0.001). LV functional parameters of patients with moderate to severe IMR were statistically different from those of the patients with mild IMR (all p < 0.001), except the LV SV index (p = 0.142) and LV CI (p = 0.447). The global longitudinal strain (GLS), regional radial strain (RS), and circumferential strain (CS) of the moderate-to-severe IMR group were significantly decreased compared with those of the mild IMR group (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, age (OR = 1.11; p = 0.001), global LV infarct extent (OR = 1.14; p = 0.000), and GLS (OR = 1.31; p = 0.000) were associated with moderate-to-severe chronic IMR. The incidence of PMI was higher in patients with moderate-to-severe IMR. The extent of global LV infarcted extent and GLS were independent predictors of moderate-to-severe IMR.

[en] Objective: The maximal diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and the change in diameter over time reflect rupture risk and are used for surgical planning. However, evidence has emerged that aneurysm volume may be a better indicator of AAA remodeling. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the volume and maximal diameter of the abdominal aorta in patients with untreated infrarenal AAA. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 100 patients with infrarenal AAA who were followed for more than 6 months. We examined 2 sets of computed tomography images for each patient, acquired ≥6 months apart. The maximal diameter and volume of the infrarenal abdominal aorta were determined by semiautomated segmentation software. Results: At baseline, mean maximal infrarenal diameter was 5.1 ± 1.0 cm and mean aortic volume was 139 ± 72 mL. There was good correlation between the maximal diameter and aortic volume at baseline (r² = 0.55; P < 0.001). The mean change in maximal diameter between studies was 0.2 ± 0.3 cm and the mean volume change was 19 ± 19 mL. However, the correlation between diameter change and volume change was modest (r² = 0.34; P = 0.001). Most patients (n = 64) had no measurable change in maximal diameter between studies (≤2 mm), but the change in volume was found to vary widely (−2 to 69 mL). Conclusion: In patients with untreated infrarenal AAA, a change in aortic volume can occur in the absence of a significant change in maximal diameter. Additional work is needed to examine the relationship between change in AAA volume and outcomes in this patient group.