[en] New diagnostic criteria for dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in prostate cancer are presented. The diagnostic usefulness of endorectal MR imaging with dynamic contrast-enhancement in localized prostate cancer and the validity of these criteria were evaluated. Eighteen untreated patients who were suspected of localized prostate cancer were included in the study. They received endorectal dynamic MR imaging before systematic sextant needle biopsy. First, a mapping study with the findings of MR images and histopathology of biopsy specimens was performed in eight patients out of 18 to compare the difference in T2-weighted images with the endorectal coil and the body coil in the same individuals. Second, another mapping study was performed in all 18 patients by analyzing the findings of endorectal dynamic MR images. For the diagnosis of prostate cancer in MR imaging, we offered diagnostic criteria from our experience in addition to those in plain T2-weighted images from the literature. The overall diagnostic rates of endorectal dynamic MR imaging were 88.9% in accuracy, 100% in sensitivity, and 81.8% in specificity. In the comparison of the endorectal and body coils in T2-weighted images in eight patients, there was no difference in the diagnostic rates except for one more histopathologic false positive portion in endorectal MR imaging. In the second mapping study in 18 patients, the diagnostic rates were 92.6% in accuracy, 88.9% in sensitivity and 93.3% in specificity. Endorectal dynamic imaging raised the diagnostic sensitivity from 77.8 to 88.9%. The data demonstrated the validity of this diagnostic criteria and the diagnostic usefulness of endorectal dynamic MR imaging in localized prostate cancer. (author)

[en] According to several guidelines, it is acceptable to spare a bone scan in the patients who are newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Our aim is to clarify a suitable group whereby a bone scan could be spared at the initial staging of prostate cancer. Consecutive 857 patients who were newly diagnosed from 2004 through 2009 and received bone scans using technetium 99m methylene diphosphonate at the initial staging were enrolled. The proportion of positive bone metastases by age distribution, prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, Gleason score and clinical T stage were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of positive bone metastases. Of all 857 patients, 40 patients (4.7%) showed bone metastases. Patients with higher age, prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage and Gleason score showed significantly higher rate of bone metastases (P<0.001). In univariate logistic regression analyses, age, prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage and Gleason score were independent predictors of bone metastasis. The multivariate analysis showed that both the prostate-specific antigen level >50 ng/ml and the Gleason score ≥4+3 were independent predictors of bone metastases. The incidences of bone metastases in patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of ≤20 ng/ml and Gleason score of ≤6 were reasonably low. Collectively, a bone scan is not necessary as a routine examination for these patients at their initial staging of prostate cancer. (author)

[en] This study evaluated the clinical utility of the highest bone scan index (BSI), among other BSIs, for each bone metastatic site in patients with bone metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (bmCRPC). Thirty patients, diagnosed with bmCRPC by bone scintigraphy, were included. Total BSI, the number of hot spots, and regional BSI on each hot spot from bone scintigraphy at diagnosis with bmCRPC were evaluated by VSBONE BSI®. Highest regional BSI was defined as the highest value among regional BSIs on each hot spot in each patient. Related factors to overall survival and skeletal-related events (SREs) were evaluated using the Cox proportional-hazards model. The median follow-up time from diagnosis with bmCRPC was 29.0 months. During this time, 24 patients died, of which 22 patients died from prostate cancer. On univariate analysis, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) [Hazard ratio (HR): 5.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.05–17.3] and highest regional BSI (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.17–7.05) had significant correlation with overall survival. On multivariate analysis, ALP (HR: 4.79, 95% CI: 1.61–14.2) had significant correlation with overall survival. SREs were found in eight patients. Only the highest regional BSI (HR: 9.99, 95% CI: 2.46–40.6) significantly correlated with SREs on univariate analysis. Highest regional BSI may provide important information regarding prognosis and SREs in patients with bmCRPC

[en] We assessed the variations in stage, prostate specific antigen at diagnosis, Gleason score, risk classification and primary therapy in Japanese prostate cancer patients, and compared with those of the United States (US) patients. Between 2004 and 2006, the distribution of primary therapy and clinical characteristics of 2303 newly diagnosed patients at Nara Medical University and its 23 affiliated hospitals were assessed to compare with those of the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor data and to clarify the differences in data between the USA and Japan. The proportions of clinical T stage of 3-4, prostate specific antigen at diagnosis >20 ng/ml, Gleason score of 8-10 and high-risk group were greater in our study than those of the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor data (T3-4, 26.2 vs. 3.5-11.8%; prostate-specific antigen, 34.1 vs. 8.1-27.0%; Gleason score, 29.3 vs. 9.7-12.1%). Regarding the primary treatments, 51% of patients received primary androgen deprivation therapy, 30% underwent radical prostatectomy, 14% received radiation therapy and 2% had watchful waiting in our study, while the corresponding figures in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor data were: radical prostatectomy, 44%; radiation therapy, 23%; primary androgen deprivation therapy 20% and watchful waiting 10%. The Japanese prostate cancer patients still have higher prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis, higher Gleason score and higher clinical stage than the US patients. The trends of primary therapy for prostate cancer were different from those in the USA. The higher rate of primary androgen deprivation therapy is characteristic for the Japanese patients. (author)

[en] The objective of this study was to assess our initial experience in the treatment of localized prostate cancer using low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-brachytherapy) with iodine-125. One-hundred consecutive patients received LDR-brachytherapy between July 2004 and October 2006. Seventy-six patients were treated with seed implantation alone, whereas 24 patients were treated with a combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy. The minimal percentage of the dose received by 90% of the prostate gland (%D90), the percentage prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose (V100), and the operation time were compared among every 10 consecutive patients. The means of %D90 and V100 were 109.6% and 93.4%, respectively. When compared with the first 10 patients, both D90 and V100 showed significant improvement in the following 10 consecutive patients. Similarly, the mean operation time decreased significantly according to the accumulated number of patients. Our initial experience with the first 100 cases suggests that LDR-brachytherapy needs accumulation of many more patients to obtain high-quality post-implant dosimetric outcomes. (author)

[en] To compare the periodical incidence rates of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients who underwent prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy between the monotherapy group (seed implantation alone) and the boost group (in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT)). A total of 218 patients with a median follow-up of 42.5 months were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups by treatment modality, namely, the monotherapy group (155 patients) and the boost group (63 patients). The periodical incidence rates of GU and GI toxicity were separately evaluated and compared between the monotherapy group and the boost group using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. To elucidate an independent factor among clinical and postdosimetric parameters to predict grade 2 or higher GU and GI toxicity in the acute and late phases, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out. Of all patients, 78.0% showed acute GU toxicity, and 7.8% showed acute GI toxicity, while 63.8% showed late GU toxicity, and 21.1% showed late GI toxicity. The incidence rates of late GU and GI toxicity were significantly higher in the boost group. Multivariate analysis showed that the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) before seed implantation was a significant parameter to predict acute GU toxicity, while there were no significant predictive parameters for acute GI toxicity. On the other hand, combination with EBRT was a significant predictive parameter for late GU toxicity, and rectal volume (mL) receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (R100) was a significant predictive parameter for late GI toxicity. The boost group showed higher incidence rates of both GU and GI toxicity. Higher IPSS before seed implantation, combination with EBRT and a higher R100 were significant predictors for acute GU, late GU and late GI toxicity

[en] Purpose: To assess, in a nationwide multi-institutional cohort study begun in 2005 and in which 6927 subjects were enrolled by 2010, the urinary and rectal toxicity profiles of subjects who enrolled during the first 2 years, and evaluate the toxicity profiles for permanent seed implantation (PI) and a combination therapy with PI and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Methods and Materials: Baseline data for 2339 subjects out of 2354 patients were available for the analyses. Toxicities were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and the International Prostate Symptom Scores were recorded prospectively until 36 months after radiation therapy. Results: Grade 2+ acute urinary toxicities developed in 7.36% (172 of 2337) and grade 2+ acute rectal toxicities developed in 1.03% (24 of 2336) of the patients. Grade 2+ late urinary and rectal toxicities developed in 5.75% (133 of 2312) and 1.86% (43 of 2312) of the patients, respectively. A higher incidence of grade 2+ acute urinary toxicity occurred in the PI group than in the EBRT group (8.49% vs 3.66%; P<.01). Acute rectal toxicity outcomes were similar between the treatment groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates for grade 2+ late urinary toxicities were 6.04% versus 4.82% for the PI and the EBRT groups, respectively, with no significant differences between the treatment groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates for grade 2+ late rectal toxicities were 0.90% versus 5.01% (P<.01) for the PI and the EBRT groups, respectively. The mean of the postimplant International Prostate Symptom Score peaked at 3 months, but it decreased to a range that was within 2 points of the baseline score, which was observed in 1625 subjects (69.47%) at the 1-year follow-up assessment. Conclusions: The acute urinary toxicities observed were acceptable given the frequency and retention, and the late rectal toxicities were more favorable than those of other studies

[en] Background and purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate chronologic changes in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), health-related (HR) quality of life (QOL), and disease-specific QOL during the first 12 months after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Materials and methods: In 81 patients who received SRT (70 Gy/35fr/7 weeks), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), 36-Item Short Form scores, and UCLA-Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) were recorded before, during, and immediately after SRT, and 1–12 months after the completion of SRT. Results: The total IPSS and storage symptom-related sum were significantly increased following initiation of SRT, and returned to the baseline 6 months after SRT. For three of eight domains of HRQOL, and the physical component summary score showed transient deterioration in the period between completion of SRT and 1 month following SRT. The UCLA-PCI for urinary function/bother and bowel function/bother was affected until 1–6 months after SRT. Conclusions: This is the first report to concurrently evaluate detailed chronologic changes in LUTS and QOL in patients who received SRT. Knowledge of changes in LUTS and QOL outcomes associated with SRT may influence treatment recommendations and enable patients to make better-informed decisions

[en] To assess the biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free rate in patients who underwent prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-brachytherapy), using two different definitions (Phoenix definition and PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL). Two hundreds and three patients who were clinically diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-2cN0M0) and underwent LDR-brachytherapy between July 2004 and September 2008 were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 72 months. We evaluated the BCR-free rate using the Phoenix definition and the PSA cut-off value of 0.2 ng/mL, as in the definition for radical prostatectomy. To evaluate an independent variable that can predict BCR, Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis was carried out. The BCR-free rate in patients using the Phoenix definition was acceptable (5-year: 92.8%). The 5- year BCR-free rate using the strict definition (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) was 74.1%. Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis showed that a higher biological effective dose (BED) of ≥180 Gy2 was the only independent variable that could predict BCR (HR: 0.570, 95% C.I.: 0.327-0.994, p = 0.048). Patients with a higher BED (≥180 Gy2) had a significantly higher BCR-free rate than those with a lower BED (<180 Gy2) (5-year BCR-free rate: 80.5% vs. 67.4%). A higher BED ≥180 Gy2 promises a favorable BCR-free rate, even if the strict definition is adopted

[en] Treatment options for patients with recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy include salvage radiotherapy of the prostatic bed and/or androgen deprivation therapy. To establish an effective treatment strategy for recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of salvage radiation monotherapy in such cases. Data from 61 men who had undergone salvage radiation monotherapy for biochemical recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients, salvage radiotherapy consisted of iraradiation to the prostatic bed (70 Gy) using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy techniques. Treatment outcome was analyzed to identify predictive factors of salvage radiotherapy. The biochemical recurrence-free survival after salvage radiation monotherapy at 2 and 5 years was 55% and 38%, respectively. Cox proportional regression models revealed that the independent predictive factors for biochemical recurrence were Gleason Score ≥ 8, negative surgical margin, and PSA velocity ≥ 0.38 ng/mL/year. Negative surgical margin and PSA velocity ≥ 0.8 ng/mL/year were significantly associated with poor response in the serum PSA levels after salvage radiotherapy. Based on our findings, we propose a treatment strategy for biochemical recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. Patients with Gleason score ≤ 7, positive surgical margin, and PSA velocity < 0.38 ng/mL/year are categorized the most favorable group, so that eradication by salvage radiation monotherapy could be expected. Other patients could be divided to two groups depending on surgical margin status and PSA velocity: 1) patients who might require combination of SRT and short-term androgen deprivation therapy and 2) patients who should be treated by androgen deprivation monotherapy