Aboukrat, Maxime; Baranna, Rodrigo; Crepel, Antoine; Daunay, Julie; Dugast, Cesar; Jancovici, Jean-Marc; Badoche, Louise; Fleuriot, Fanny; Rosetti, Yann; Diaz Sanchez, Aldo; Texier, Cecile; Farfal, Thomas; Lignel, Margaux; Abergel, Thibaut; Cibla, Emmanuel; Fresel, Louis; Brac de la Perriere, Thibaut; Grau, Anne; Hounsou, Meleika; Prieur-Vernat, Anne; Tremblay, Clement; Machon, Clement; Delfeld, Christophe; Guillo-Lohan, Pascale; Pognonec, Gael; Dietrich, Laeticia; Cibulka, Chloe; Valade, Helene; Barbry, Benedicte; Fortunato, Anne-Daniele; Canet, Jean-Manuel; Tuzzolino, Philippe; Aitamar, Nadia; Oulakrouz, Nora; Menacer, Aurelia; Bufano, Daniele; Finidori, Esther; Van Renterghem, Caroline; Rousselet, Claire; Bernabeu, Noe; Durepaire, Julie; Geoffroy, Philippe; Pigeon, Celine; Coly, Mehdi; Degardin, Lea
Carbone 4, 54 rue de Clichy, 75009 Paris (France)2022
Carbone 4, 54 rue de Clichy, 75009 Paris (France)2022
AbstractAbstract
[en] This document is the guide to understanding the second pillar of the NZI dashboard, also referred to as pillar B. Pillar B is aimed at quantifying a firm's positive impact on the greenhouse gas emissions of its ecosystem. It is composed of two major families: B2: how the company's solutions contribute to decarbonization, B3: the company's financial contribution to projects to reduce emissions outside its value chain. For the first family, this guide offers: 1) A general methodological framework for calculating and reporting avoided emissions generated by corporate solutions; 2) A toolbox containing: Detailed methodologies for calculating avoided emissions for three economic sectors: Mobility, Construction and Energy; Quantified applications for certain solutions in France: Avoidance Factors (FEv) to quickly estimate avoided emissions. Conceptual framework: avoided emissions are the difference between emissions in a reference situation and emissions in a situation with a decarbonizing solution. The emissions in these two situations depend on the context in which the solution is implemented: geography, client profiles, market segments, etc. - Choice of reference situation: two main types of reference situations have been identified; - the previous situation and the average of the market context. Net Zero Initiative describes a typology of contexts that enables the identification of a robust reference situation for a given context. - Timeframe: Avoided emissions are calculated for the entire lifespan of the solution sold by the company. It is possible to update the calculation annually by using the input data corresponding to the year of calculation. - Perimeter: The calculation of avoided emissions is done according to a life-cycle rationale: emissions from production, utilization, end of life, etc. have to be taken into account. - Evolution of emissions though time: The projected decarbonization of energy and other dynamic effects must be taken into account in the calculations. - Precision level of hypotheses: the calculation of avoided emissions may have varying levels of precision: specific to each solution sold, company average, or market average. The level of precision depends particularly on the type of solution and the availability of data. Covered in the present report: Mobility, Construction and Energy. The toolbox provides sector-specific methodological sheets on avoided emissions for each solution/context pair. For certain solutions, it also provides detailed methodological sheets and the first generation of Avoidance Factors (AFv) in France. The guide proposes a method for reporting additional avoided emissions generated by financing projects outside the company's value chain
[fr]
L'objectif du pilier B, et plus precisement de la categorie B2 'decarbonation par les solutions', est d'aider les entreprises a faire evoluer leur portefeuille de produits et services afin de rendre celui-ci compatible avec l'Accord de Paris. A ce jour, la metrique cle pour suivre l'action d'une entreprise sur cette categorie B2 est l'indicateur emissions evitees. Or, une solution qui permet de revendiquer des emissions evitees n'est pas necessairement compatible avec un monde bas-carbone. NZI propose donc de creer un nouvel indicateur pour completer les emissions evitees sur le pilier B: le Score de Compatibilite avec l'Accord de Paris (SCAP). Ce nouvel indicateur a pour objectif de mesurer la pertinence d'un produit ou d'un service dans un monde bas-carbone ayant opere sa transition selon une trajectoire de decarbonation 1,5 deg. C ou well below 2 deg. C. Il permet de classer les solutions vendues par les entreprises a l'aune de leur capacite a repondre aux besoins humains de maniere plus ou moins bas-carbone. Le SCAP peut etre calcule a l'echelle d'une solution, mais aussi d'un portefeuille entier de solutions (et donc a l'echelle d'une entreprise). Calculer son SCAP permet a une entreprise d'affiner sa comprehension de sa dependance au carbone, d'ameliorer sa connaissance des determinants de la demande pour ses produits et services et de faciliter la constitution d'un portefeuille de solutions compatible avec la transition bas-carbone. Le present document detaille le principe de calcul de ce nouvel indicateur, son lien avec la Taxonomie Europeenne et son articulation possible avec l'indicateur 'emissions evitees' au sein de la categorie B2 'Contribution des solutions' du pilier B. Enfin, une boite a outils en fin de document fournit aux entreprises des premieres donnees necessaires au calcul de leur SCAP et des etudes de cas pour illustrer concretement le calcul de cet indicateur a l'echelle d'une organisationOriginal Title
Net Zero Initiative - Proposition d'un nouvel indicateur climat. Compatibilite des solutions avec l'Accord de Paris
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Jun 2022; 176 p; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT, CALCULATION METHODS, CARBON FOOTPRINT, CARBON NEUTRALITY, CARPOOLING, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, ELECTRIC-POWERED VEHICLES, ENERGY EFFICIENCY, ENERGY LOSSES, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, HEAT PUMPS, LOW-ENERGY BUILDINGS, MARKET, OPTIMIZATION, PARIS AGREEMENT, PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER PLANTS, RETROFITTING, SYNTHETIC FUELS, TRANSPORTATION SECTOR
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Dugast, Cesar; Bettin, Renaud; Bachelet, Luc; Amant, Stephane; Joly, Alexandre; Moneuse, Marion; Florentin, Alexandre; Girard, Theo; Aboukrat, Maxime; Baranna, Rodrigo; Vasselin, Zenon; Boucher, Olivier; Baron, Richard; Bringault, Anne; Leguet, Benoit; Grimault, Julia; Foucherot, Claudine; Cevallos, Gabriella; Colombier, Michel; Briand, Yann; Svensson, Johannes; Nikov, Dimitar; Verles, Marion; Cuong Le Quan, Minh; Grandjean, Alain; Jancovici, Jean-Marc; Faure-Fedigan, Christine; Brac de la Perriere, Thibaud; Tuzzolino, Philippe; Canet, Jean- Manuel; Durand, Marie-Therese; Tran, Dang; Garcia, Sophia; Menacer, Aurelia; Garreau, Francois; Bressaud, Elodie; Le Seach, Christian; Pons, Nathalie; Painchaud, Aurelien; Nunes, Sebastien; Dufrasne, Gilles; Fragniere, Augustin; Aubry, Emilie; Guillo-Lohan, Pascale; Delfeld, Christophe; Valade, Helene; Lechat, Yoann; Blais, Philippe; Griton, Juliette; Bouteloup, Bastien; Fleuriot, Fanny; Pernigotti, Daniele; Rambaud, Alexandre; Guyot, Jonathan; Goube, Cecile; Huet, Damien; Castagne, Manon; Fyson, Claire; Laurent, David; Jousset, Matthieu; Favrel, Adeline; Bultheel, Clement; Huet, Emmanuelle; Warnecke, Carsten; Day, Thomas; Cowie, Annette; Mitchell-Larson, Eli; Hale, Thomas; Cartal, Aurelien; Hallaire, Stephane; Broekhoff, Derik; Hegde, Gajanana; Naranjo Gonzalez, Miguel; Siyag, Panna; Rich, David; Ramlow, Matt; Badoche, Louise
Carbone 4, 54 rue de clichy, 75009 Paris (France)2020
Carbone 4, 54 rue de clichy, 75009 Paris (France)2020
AbstractAbstract
[en] The Net Zero Initiative, led by Carbone 4 along with a dozen of pioneer companies and a high-level Scientific Committee, releases its guidelines for organizations to contribute to the global net-zero. The first document, the Net Zero Initiative reference framework, suggests adopting a common language to all the stakeholders willing to manage their climate action in a sincere, transparent and constructive way, with the aim of reaching net-zero emissions worldwide, while being consistent with the existing tools and methods. Now is the time for action; and to make a more efficient use of it, all the stakeholders need to agree on the same priorities, the same concepts, and the same time horizon. Since the only scientifically valid definition of net zero so far applies only to the planet, and possibly to state actors, the Net Zero Initiative has sought since its creation to think of the company not as an object that can be 'neutral' in itself, but as one that should contribute at the right level to the objective of global and national carbon neutrality. Consequently, the notion of a 'net zero' or 'neutral' company has been abandoned in favor of independent indicators that measure a company's climate performance against the global net zero requirement at any given time. The Net Zero Initiative framework can be seen as a generalization of the carbon footprint concept, since it integrates it (Pillar A) while enriching it with two additional indicators: the company's capacity to participate in the decarbonation of third parties (Pillar B), and its capacity to develop carbon removals (Pillar C). These three Pillars are strictly independent of each other and are not fungible. In 2020, the second season of the Net Zero Initiative wanted to explore two major issues: Measuring Pillar B (avoided emissions): what metrics and calculation rules should be applied to measure a company's ability to contribute to the decarbonation of its ecosystem? Setting objectives for Pillar C (carbon sinks): what is the right level of contribution to increasing carbon removals for a company? These two questions are developed in the 2020-2021 Final Report
[fr]
Le projet Net Zero Initiative, initie en juin 2018 et porte par Carbone 4 en collaboration avec une dizaine d'entreprises pionnieres, et appuye par un conseil scientifique de haut niveau, publie son referentiel de contribution des organisations a la neutralite carbone. Un premier document, le referentiel Net Zero Initiative, propose un langage commun a tous les acteurs souhaitant piloter leur action climatique de maniere sincere, ambitieuse et transparente en vue de l'atteinte du zero emissions nettes mondial, et en coherence avec les instruments et methodologies existants. Le temps est a l'action; et pour agir le plus efficacement possible, l'alignement de tous les acteurs sur les memes priorites, les memes concepts, le meme horizon, est un imperatif. La seule definition scientifiquement valable du net zero ne s'appliquant aujourd'hui qu'a la planete, et eventuellement aux acteurs etatiques, Net Zero Initiative cherche depuis sa creation a penser l'entreprise non pas comme un objet pouvant etre 'neutre' en soi, mais devant avant tout contribuer au juste niveau a l'objectif de neutralite carbone mondial ou national. Des lors, la notion d'entreprise 'net zero' ou 'neutre' est abandonnee au profit d'indicateurs independants charges de mesurer, a tout instant, la performance climat d'une entreprise a l'aune de l'exigence du net zero mondial. La matrice Net Zero Initiative peut etre vue comme la generalisation du concept de bilan carbone, puisqu'il l'integre (Pilier A) tout en le completant par deux indicateurs supplementaires: la capacite de l'entreprise a participer a la decarbonation d'acteurs tiers (Pilier B), et sa capacite a developper des puits de carbone (Pilier C). Ces trois piliers sont strictement independants les uns vis-a-vis des autres, et non fongibles. En 2020, la seconde saison de Net Zero Initiative a souhaite creuser deux grandes problematiques: La mesure du pilier B (emissions evitees): quelle metrique, et quelles regles de calcul appliquer pour mesurer la capacite d'une entreprise a contribuer a la decarbonation de son ecosysteme? La fixation d'objectifs sur le pilier C (puits de carbone): quel est le juste niveau de contribution a l'augmentation des puits de carbone pour une entreprise? Ces deux questions sont traitees dans le Rapport final 2020-2021Original Title
Net zero initiative: un referentiel pour une neutralite carbone collective. Net zero initiative 2020-2021 Rapport final + Annexes + Webinaire
Primary Subject
Source
Apr 2020; Jul 2021; 468 p; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue