Como avalia e acompanha a implementação das recomendações de auditoria?

Thorough analysis: Carefully review the audit report, focusing on the findings, recommendations, and action plans. Ensure you understand the root causes of identified problems and the proposed solutions. Clarification and discussion: If necessary, seek clarification from the auditors regarding any aspects of the report or specific recommendations. Encourage open dialogue and discussion to ensure everyone is aligned on the path forward.

High-risk issues should be prioritized for immediate action. Set realistic deadlines for implementation. Regularly monitor progress . Document all actions taken to implement the recommendations. Prepare periodic reports on the status of the implementation. Conduct a follow-up audit to verify that the recommendations have been implemented effectively. Evaluate whether the implemented actions have mitigated the identified risks or addressed the issues satisfactorily. Use the follow-up audit findings to improve the audit process. Communicate progress and final outcomes to management and relevant stakeholders. report significant findings and their resolution to the audit committee or board of directors.

After completing an audit, I prepare a detailed report outlining each recommendation, including the rationale and expected benefits. For instance, if a recommendation involves enhancing the operational framework, I provide a comprehensive explanation of the identified vulnerabilities, the recommended controls, and the potential impact on the bank’s operational posture. I then discuss the report with the relevant department heads to ensure they fully understand the recommendations and their importance.

A avaliação e o acompanhamento das recomendações de auditoria começam com a definição de planos de ação claros, prazos e responsáveis. Monitoro o progresso por meio de relatórios periódicos e indicadores, validando a eficácia das mudanças implantadas. Revisões regulares garantem ajustes necessários, enquanto o diálogo com as partes envolvidas reforça o compromisso com melhorias sustentáveis e contínuas.

To evaluate and follow up on audit recommendations: 1. Define clear recommendations following the SMART framework. 2. Assign responsibility and accountability for each recommendation. 3. Develop a detailed action plan with specific steps and timelines. 4. Monitor progress regularly using appropriate tracking tools. 5. Conduct follow-up audits to assess implementation status. 6. Evaluate outcomes and impacts of implemented recommendations. 7. Address challenges and provide necessary support. 8. Review and update the action plan based on feedback and lessons learned. 9. Communicate results to stakeholders, highlighting successes and areas for improvement.

Severity assessment: Analyze the recommendations and prioritize them based on their severity, potential impact, and feasibility of implementation. Focus on addressing high-risk areas and critical issues first. Resource allocation: Allocate resources effectively to ensure timely implementation of prioritized recommendations. Consider the availability of personnel, budget, and other necessary resources.

For each recommendation, I work with the responsible managers to create a detailed action plan that includes specific tasks, deadlines, and assigned responsibilities. For example, if the audit identified deficiencies in the anti-money laundering (AML) procedures, the action plan might include tasks such as revising the AML policy, conducting staff training, and implementing enhanced transaction monitoring systems. This collaborative approach ensures that all stakeholders are committed to implementing the recommendations.

The consideration of implementing a recommendation should also include long term sustainability of the change as in some cases it will be a core process change.

In my opinion , a proper process in place eases the monitoring activities. The plan should be sent to Authorized Recipients of the Auditee and should detail: • Determination of root cause(s); • Description of the proposed corrective action to address root cause(s); • Application of a preventive action to prevent future recurrence of the problem or related issue; • The date the action is expected to be completed & • Current status of the action items With the Validated Audit Report (VAR), a pre-populated CAP will be issued. The Auditee will receive a CAP that will contain the non conformances identified in the Validated Audit. Now We need to Manage all these CAP through tracker.

Action plan development: Develop a comprehensive action plan for each prioritized recommendation. This plan should outline specific tasks, timelines, responsibilities, and resources required for successful implementation. Regular tracking: Regularly track the progress of action plan implementation. Use dashboards, reports, and meetings to monitor progress, identify any potential delays or roadblocks, and take corrective action as needed.

I schedule regular check-ins with the responsible managers to review the progress of the implementation plan. For example, I might conduct monthly meetings to discuss the status of the action items, review any completed tasks, and address any challenges or delays. During these meetings, I update the implementation status and provide feedback or assistance as needed to ensure timely completion.

Evaluation and assessment: Upon completion of corrective actions, conduct an evaluation to assess whether the recommendations have been implemented effectively and have achieved the desired results. Verification and validation: Verify the effectiveness of implemented solutions through testing, data analysis, and stakeholder feedback.

After conducting the follow-up audit, I prepare a follow-up report that details the status of each recommendation, the actions taken, and the outcomes achieved. For instance, the report might show that all recommended Operational measures have been implemented and have significantly reduced the risk of operational breaches. This report is shared with senior management and the audit committee to provide transparency and demonstrate the effectiveness of the audit process.

Communication and transparency: Maintain open communication and transparency throughout the evaluation and follow-up process. Regularly communicate the status of action plans and progress updates to relevant stakeholders. Continuous improvement: Use the evaluation results to identify areas for further improvement and refine your audit follow-up process. This ensures continuous learning and adaptation based on experience and evolving needs. External support: If necessary, consider seeking external support from consultants or experts to provide guidance and expertise in evaluating and following up on audit recommendations.

As an Auditor, establishing a feedback loop for continuous improvement ensures that the audit process evolves and improves over time. In my experience, I solicit feedback from the implementation teams and other stakeholders to identify any challenges or areas for improvement in the audit and follow-up processes. For instance, if the feedback indicates that certain recommendations were difficult to implement due to resource constraints, I might refine my recommendation approach to be more practical and achievable in future audits. This continuous improvement process helps enhance the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the audit function.

Recommendations are tasks up the customer to take them into account. Those are supposed to be evaluated and a decision to be made if they could lead to an improvement for the Organisation.

There are severals ways to follow audits recomendations from second or third party. Once opportunity is ack of an issue, track them on a follow up log. Follow daily and report weekly progress. Management awareness thru monthly review. Area manager shall lead the findings and Quality team to ensure evidence area clear to solve finding.