Como escolher entre um modelo de decisão majoritário e consensual?

Use the majority model if the decision must be made in a compressed timeframe, and the decision is reversible. Beware, majority rule usually means you're voting with the Alpha in the room.

The Less Important The Decision Use Majority Decision-Making Pros: 1. Efficient: Decisions can be made quickly, especially in larger groups. 2. Clarity: The outcome is clear, as it reflects the majority's preference. 3. Simplicity: Easy to implement and understand, minimizing complexity. 4. Swift Action: Facilitates rapid decision-making without prolonged discussions. Cons: 1. Exclusion: Minority opinions can feel disregarded, leading to dissatisfaction. 2. Lack of Nuance: Complex issues may be oversimplified, neglecting essential details. 3. Potential for Polarization: It can lead to a "win-lose" mindset, creating division within the group. 4. Limited Discussion: This may limit the in-depth exploration of ideas and concerns.

The More Important The Decision Use Consensus Decision-Making Pros: 1. Collaboration: Encourages working together while considering diverse perspectives. 2. Better Solutions: Can be more comprehensive in innovative solutions. 3. Higher Satisfaction: Individuals tends to support decisions they actively participated in making. 4. Inclusive Decision-Making: Creates inclusivity/shared responsibility. Cons: 1. Time-Consuming: May take longer with discussions/negotiations. 2. Difficulty in Large Groups: Can be challenging gathering input to reach agreement. 3. Risk of Compromise: Can lead to watered-down decisions, miss critical points, not everyone satisfied. 4. Resistance: Some may resist decisions made collectively, slowing progress.

If outcomes between different alternatives are known, then the consensus model works very well. If outcomes are not known, such as investing in innovation, neither model works well. These should be business unit leader decisions to pursue tests that reveal commercial truth. Only then is the consensus model appropriate. If you use this model before testing, the only thing you know for sure is that the idea is not innovative. The consensus model is also most appropriate for irreversible decisions. These are decisions that are hard to reverse quickly, such as a long-term lease, acquiring a rival company, etc.

Majority Decision-Making Pros: +Efficient quick, in larger groups +Clarity clear outcome with a majority's preference +Simple to understand, minimizing complexity Cons: +Exclusion of minority opinions (neglected/dissatisfied) +Lack of Nuance complex issues is oversimplified, neglecting critical details +Polarization with "win-lose" creating segregation Consensus Decision-Making Pros: +Collaboration encourages people to work together on diverse perspectives +Better Solutions from comprehensive/innovative solutions Higher Satisfaction to support decisions Cons: +Time Consuming to get consensus because of discussions/negotiations +Difficult w/ Large Teams gathering people input to agree +Compromise water-down decisions, not satisfing all

When choosing between decision-making models, ask yourself three questions: 1) Is this a decision where the outcomes are known or unknown? If known, use the consensus model. If unknown, don't use either model; make an executive decision to test and learn. Only then is the consensus model appropriate. 2) Is this a reversible or irreversible decision? If reversible, speed is your friend. If irreversible or hard to reverse, use the consensus model. Remember, in all irreversible decisions, if you don't know, you know. 3) When must this decision be made? If time is of the essence, use the majority model. No decision is often the worst decision.

(We Do) Hybrid Decision Process 1. Majority Voting for Quick Decisions - Subject matters to discuss - Present options, gather preferences - Choose the option with majority support 2. Open Consensus Discussions for Complex Issues - Initiate open discussions for diverse perspectives - Encourage concerns, ideas, solutions - Facilitate collaboration during discussions 3. Consolidate Feedback and Adjust Decisions - Collect feedback, discuss, adjust the initial option - Modify decisions, address concerns to incorporate ideas 4. Final Confirmation Through Majority Vote - Once adjustments; after discussions, conduct a final majority vote 5. Communicate Rational-Decision - Communicate rationale, give final decision

There is seldom one best answer to the strategic questions that face organizations. Regardless of the decision-making model used, do not diffuse accountability. The ability to execute and pivot as unknowns become known is often what makes a decision "good." People support what they help create. If there isn't clear accountability and leaders can point to recommendations by consultants or "working as directed," then the battle is lost before it's begun.

I don't accept the premise of the question. As a leader you have to understand a simple concept from (dont be afraid) complex systems engineering. For a finite system (i.e. limited resources aka all organizations) for the system to be fully optimized, this means that some subsystems won't be. In other words equal deployment of resources accross all departments, the company will not produce at its greatest level of impact. It is critical for teams to understand why resources are being deployed the way they are. This is also where I will also note that as a leader you job is to professionally and passionately stand up for your team. This is done in private and if you, you must take ownership of the order whether you eith it or agreed or not