Turkeys lie
December 18, 2018
We all know what turkeys look like, right?
Turns out that two thirds of that bird is a lie. Here’s a diagram produced for hunters on which part of the turkey to shoot. (It’s all over the Internet, and I can’t trace the original source, but I got it from here):
Bascially, if you fire an arrow at a visible turkey, there’s a 2/3 chance that it’ll pass straight through feathers and completely miss the actual bird.
Now, then: what do we think a theropod looked like in life? Probably not much like what skeleton reconstructions show as the flesh envlope, as for example in Scott Hartman’s Guanlong:
Instead, it might have looked like this:
(Note: this is not in any way a criticism of Scott’s fine work, which is a scientific restoration of the soft tissue, and does not address integument at all.)
And now that pterosaurs have feathers, too(*), we have to assume that they, too, probably had body outlines bearing little resemblance to the flesh-on-bone shapes we’ve been used to seeing.
(*) As Matt pointed out: “I can’t be bothered to write “integumentary structures” when I mean “feathers”. I realize they may be independently derived, but eyes evolved independently like 40 times and we don’t refer to the other 39 instances as “photoreceptive structures”.” (He actually wrote “I can’t be arsed”, but I changed it to “bothered” to make him appear more professional.)
December 18, 2018 at 10:59 pm
[…] Turkeys lie […]
December 20, 2018 at 7:19 pm
This hypothetical outline of Guanglong looks like it is straight out of David Peters work, using his “Digital Graphic Segregation” method.
I have no intention to suggest that what he sees is actually there or any more plausible because there is this ridiculous amount of feathers and other soft tissue on some extant dinosaurs.
December 20, 2018 at 10:25 pm
Believe it or not, I somehow contrived an even more unscientific reconstruction method than Peters’. I just painted in something that looked kinda like a turkey outline.