Yep, it does 👇
Quote: "Intel’s extended study, which tried to see if AI can save time and boost productivity, found that “current AI PC owners spend longer on tasks than their counterparts using traditional PCs.” According to the study, the users of these AIs spent a long time trying to identify “how best to communicate with AI tools to get the desired answers or response,” which is why they took longer. However, there is also a stark lack of data in the report on how much time was spent monitoring and correcting these AIs’ outputs, as this is an infamous flaw of AI, which we will come to in a minute. This omission, combined with Intel’s perplexingly optimistic summary of the study, which stated that people need to be better educated on using these AI tools, feels like their conflict of interest is massively clouding their judgement. And it isn’t just Intel that found that AI simply doesn’t deliver on its promised productivity gains. A recent study found that while 96% of executive managers say they expect AI to boost productivity dramatically, 77% of their employees say AI has increased their workload, and 39% reported spending more time moderating the AI than actually doing the task themselves. This is backed up by IGN, which found that AI can only increase productivity by 0.1% at most, and MIT, which found that even in an ideal situation, AI can only increase productivity by 0.5%. There are also hard, real-world examples of how AI fails to increase productivity." More details: https://lnkd.in/egWVPs9e