Here's how you can efficiently gather research materials and conduct literature reviews for your projects.

It is rightly said, 'Defining goals is the first step in turning something invisible into visible'. Imagine driving your car when you do not know where to go! The importance of setting goals is thus, of paramount importance, especially when it comes to perform research and conducting a literature review for the same. Articulating the problem statement and defining the approach in form of a flowchart or a tree-diagram often gives you the clarity in terms of the scope of the project and the level of depth required in the literature review. Defining the goal and scope gives start and end points to the process of the research which otherwise would know no bounds. Surveying previously done research will also give an idea about the whereabouts.

The field work is the backbone of folklore studies. And I found determining research questions and hypotheses give clear idea about how you can lead your field work. you can encounter some new inquiries through your examinations, you may discover some elements, some areas you need to focus on but in general you find the way clearer as you proceed.

Every result matters Negetive or Positive Don't stress Srenpidity is keep to discover And most importantly keep eye on everything What is unimportant is sometimes the main thing which is unveiled So keep on going

La claridad en los objetivos son una excelente base para lograr lo que se pretende con una investigación. Los objetivos siempre tendrán un alcance, y por ende, necesitamos medirlos. He aquí entonces que cada uno de ellos, quede lo más claro posible incluso para quien realiza la investigación, de otra manera, el rumbo de este trabajo estará destinado a fracasar.

In my view, the research topic must be both practicable and feasible, taking into account the existing knowledge domain. Furthermore, I would strongly recommend the use of a reading matrix to integrate the views of other experts in the same field.

At first I was searching for articles on PubMed probably the same as every person at the beginning of their career, ones that returned thousands of results. It was enlighting, while at a Workshop, someone showed us how to properly use PubMed search tools, it was like learning how to use the wheel for the first time. With that I managed to grow and went to write syntaxes for the systematic reviews that our departement worked on at the time. Now, there are so many ways to learn how to write a good search syntax and, of course, when in doubt, you can even reach out to different AI tools to get a good start.

One thing I have found very helpful is the use of Google scholar to define my search for research materials for my research project. Google scholar provides me the opportunity to select the sources/publishers of my research materials and also the range of years of publication of research materials.

I still rely on PubMed and Google scholar for quick searches for specific journal articles, but I have grown fond of AI-powered search tools like ResearchRabbit (recommended to me by colleagues in grad school). This tool is particularly good at taking a deep dive back in time for foundational research literature on any given topic. It's also free!

Es evidente que existen buscadores académicos del máximo rigor y confianza. Dialnet o Academia, con carácter general y, en el ámbito jurídico, Westlaw y La Ley, aseguran encontrar fuentes fiables y, sobre todo, actualizadas En este sentido, contar con escritos/jurisprudencia recientes puede dar un mayor marchamo de calidad a las investigaciones, así como permitir desarrollar vertientes incluso no inicialmente identificadas de las tesis propias.

Every platform provides easy search of articles with ease of keywords. The filter options with and, not, etc. makes the search more easier. Always note down important keywords that you come across reading articles and use them wisely with the advanced search thereafter.

One thing I have found helpful is looking through abstracts. The abstract in addition to the publication information will help you quickly determine the relevance of the paper to the topic you are reviewing. Generally, I use the 5-year rule, meaning that it needs to have been published in the last 5 years, and the methods and data analysis should align with what is generally accepted in the field. This technique allows me to go through several papers quickly to assess both their credibility and relevance.

Suele resultarme muy útil fijarme en si los artículos que consulto tienen resumen, palabras clave y sistemas de citación claros, según APA u otras formas. Asimismo, es muy relevante poder acceder a algún perfil público del investigador, sea en redes sociales generales como en sistemas fiables de identificación específicos de autores, como ORCID.

When evaluating sources, it is important to consider their credibility, relevance, and veracity. Take into account the author's knowledge and experience, the date of publication, and the reputation of the source. Examine for bias, corroborating evidence, and citations. Verify that the information is consistent with other reliable sources and is suitable for your research setting. This technique guarantees the accuracy and validity of the data.

Las fuentes más confiables son artículos publicados en revistas indexadas, libros y investigaciones de organizaciones de la sociedad civil y organizaciones gubernamentales. También los reportajes periodísticos pueden ayudar. Una forma de poder verificar la información de estos textos es ir a las fuentes citadas y las referencias. Ello para comprobar que la información compartida es verídica.

Evaluating sources is indeed a critical step in the research process. Here are some detailed tips to help you assess the credibility and relevance of your sources: Author Credentials: Look for the author's qualifications, affiliations, and previous work. Experts in the field often have advanced degrees and a history of publications in reputable journals. Publication Date: Ensure the source is current, especially in fast-evolving fields like technology and medicine. However, for historical or foundational theories, older sources may still be relevant. Publisher Reputation: Trust sources from well-known publishers, academic institutions, and professional organizations. Be wary of predatory journals and self-published works.

It is always a good practice to note down the findings and get it safely kept for the future. People can either jot down or Even use digital platforms for the same. Software like mendley, zotero, etc. proves to be widely used to annotate and move back and forth to refer to and are easy to cite in references as well. They provide flexible ways of storing your files under each subheading and are accessible anywhere you go, rather than taking your copy with you.

keep your mind well-organized and don't forget to record every step you take in your research path. we often need to revise or add something to make our article better and, without appropriately recording the previous documents, you will face to a big problem.

Organization is key to thorough and well-informed research, and tends to quicken the pace of completion as it allows for the quick retrieval of information and data when drafting. This is especially important when working in a team setting and resources are shared. For legal research it can be helpful to keep case briefs of the key case laws referred to prepared. Creating a research log can assist in tracking the progress on the sources reviewed, their place within your research, and how they may contribute to the research question.

Organizing discoveries entails methodically structuring data to emphasize crucial observations. Organize the information using categories, themes, or in chronological order. Generate visual aids such as charts, tables, and graphs to enhance clarity. Provide a concise overview of the key topics, highlighting any recurring themes or unusual occurrences. This systematic technique enhances comprehension, comparison, and exposition of the research results.

The 'thematic approach' to literature review has proven invaluable to me in this regard. It helps organize my findings in a manner that allows the subject to flow. This methodology also helps build my findings around a topic or issue rather than the progression of time especially when the subject is not a historical one. When reviewing subject by Author, there is always the likelihood of digression. But the thematic approach helps me stay focused on my subject by taking only what's relevant to my topic and moving on.

En ámbitos cono el Derecho debemos mejorar enormemente en este ámbito. Parece que un libro o un artículo es mejor porque tiene más páginas o más "peso." En la Universidad animo a mis alumnos, en sus Trabajos de Fin de Grado, investiguen temas sobre los que hay poco escrito, para que puedan innovar realmente el corpus de conocimiento de la rama de que se trate. Sería muy útil poner límites de palabras en las tesis doctorales para que estas no se conviertan en acríticos compendios de resúmenes de lo que otros han escrito.

Reading literature of same topic and summarising gives an idea of possible developments happening in the field. This can give a clue in identifying a research gap after critical analysis. Literature review is never a burden - great review papers come out of it getting published in top journals and also many possible research opportunities takes birth from such extensive reviews.

Synthesizing literature entails amalgamating information from several sources to develop a cohesive comprehension. Analyze and evaluate the main topics, trends, and areas of research that are lacking, while also highlighting the similarities and differences in the findings. Incorporate several viewpoints to develop a unified storyline that emphasizes the existing understanding and guides future research paths. This method increases the level of analysis.

Es importante tener una lectura inteligente de toda la información que se encuentre. Sugiero hacer lectura vertical de todo el texto y buscar palabras clave. Ello con la intención de sacar la información que necesitamos, en torno a las variables e indicadores, y prevenir la saturación de información y la lectura inagotable.

Reflect and adjust involves regularly evaluating your research progress and methods. Assess what is working well and identify areas needing improvement. Make necessary changes to strategies, approaches, or objectives based on insights gained. This iterative process ensures the research remains effective, relevant, and aligned with its goals.

If you're hitting dead ends, consider expanding your search beyond your core discipline. Look for literature from adjacent fields that might offer fresh perspectives on your research question. This interdisciplinary approach can uncover hidden connections and lead to a more nuanced understanding of your topic. Also, sometimes the issue lies not with the literature but with the research question itself. As you delve deeper, you might discover that your initial research question needs refinement to better capture the complexity of your topic. Revisit your research question in light of your findings, and be prepared to iterate on it as your understanding evolves.

Reitero que la creatividad y el espíritu crítico hacia lo que uno piensa inicialmente son tan claves en una investigación como ser capaz de plantear una tesis inicial. Es responsabilidad de cualquier investigador riguroso someter a crítica las tesis propias.

To efficiently gather research materials and conduct literature reviews: -Define Research Question: Clarify your scope and objectives. -Use Key Databases: Search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science. -Advanced Search Techniques: Employ Boolean operators & filters. -Set Up Alerts: Get updates on new publications. -Consult Review Articles: Identify key studies & researchers. -Organize Findings: Use reference management software; EndNote or Mendeley. -Evaluate Sources: Check credibility and relevance. -Systematic Reading: Skim abstracts first, then read thoroughly. -Take Notes: Summarize key points & note research gaps. -Synthesize Information: Identify patterns & themes. -Draft and Revise: Create an outline & write clearly, then revise.

For the purpose of conducting literature reviews and collecting research materials:Scope and objectives should be defined in order to construct a research questions, Lookup Results in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. Sophisticated review, Receive notifications when new publications are added. Learn about important studies and their authors. Utilize a reference management program such as Mendeley or EndNote, Verify the validity and applicability. Prior to delving into the text, quickly review the abstract. Memorize Important Points and Make Note of Any Research Gaps. Find Commonalities and Trends. Make an outline and write clearly before revising.