Here's how you can navigate biases and cognitive limitations when making strategic decisions.

💡Recognizing biases is the first step in improving strategic decision-making. Understanding our cognitive limitations helps in making more informed choices. 🧠 Confirmation Bias Confirmation bias makes us seek out information that aligns with our preconceptions, ignoring conflicting data. Awareness helps counteract this tendency. 📏 Anchoring Effect The anchoring effect leads us to rely too much on initial information. Being mindful of this bias ensures more balanced evaluation of subsequent data. 🔄 Status Quo Bias Status quo bias favors existing conditions over change. Recognizing this can help us consider innovative solutions rather than sticking to the familiar.

Dans un milieu professionnel, les préjugés sont très présents et il faut les reconnaitre. Pour les reconnaitre, tout d'abord il faut prendre le temps d'écouter la personne c'est à dire parler avec la personne et l'étudier. la suite il faut savoir ses croyances, ses idées et son cadre d'évolution. Finalement, vous essayerai de voir ses pensées, sa capacité de réflexion et ses réactions aux aspects du quotidien. Là capacité cognitive est très importante. Est ce que la personnes crois facilement au gens ou la personne est du genre a venir vers vous pour confirmer ses idées reçues.

Em primeiro lugar e falar o que são Vieses. Vieses cognitivos são padrões de pensamento que podem distorcer nossa percepção e levar a julgamentos errôneos. Eles são uma parte natural do funcionamento do cérebro humano, que tende a criar atalhos mentais para processar informações rapidamente. No entanto, esses atalhos podem resultar em preconceitos que influenciam negativamente nossas decisões e interações.

Certainly! Navigating biases and cognitive limitations in strategic decision-making is crucial for effective outcomes. Let’s explore some strategies: Learn About Cognitive Biases: Familiarize yourself with common cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, anchoring bias, and availability heuristic1. Understanding these patterns helps you recognize them and counteract their influence. Question Your Assumptions: When making decisions, slow down and critically evaluate your assumptions. Consider seeking diverse perspectives and expanding your information sources to avoid fixating on initial data points. Collaborate: Engage with others to gain different viewpoints.

Negative bias, the tendency to focus more on negative experiences or information, can significantly impact our perceptions and decisions. Recognizing and managing this bias is crucial for maintaining a balanced perspective.

Include diverse viewpoints in decision-making processes to challenge assumptions and broaden understanding. Rely on data and empirical evidence rather than intuition or anecdotal information.

Gathering diverse views helps navigate biases and cognitive limitations in strategic decisions by incorporating varied perspectives and reducing groupthink. For example, at Google, diverse teams bring different cultural, technical, and experiential insights, leading to more innovative solutions. In decision-making meetings, actively soliciting input from team members across departments ensures a broader range of ideas and considerations. This diversity challenges assumptions and highlights blind spots, leading to more balanced and well-rounded decisions. By leveraging varied viewpoints, organizations can better anticipate risks and opportunities, resulting in more effective and inclusive strategies.

Na minha experiência, a diversidade de pensamento amplia horizontes. Desafia paradigmas. Impulsiona inovação. Uma coisa que eu achei útil foi criar equipes multidisciplinares para projetos estratégicos. Reúno pessoas de diferentes departamentos, níveis hierárquicos e backgrounds. Essa abordagem nem sempre é confortável, mas é incrivelmente eficaz. O verdadeiro poder se manifesta quando criamos um ambiente onde todas as vozes são ouvidas e respeitadas. Isso requer um esforço consciente para superar nossas tendências naturais de buscar consenso ou favorecer opiniões similares às nossas. Ao agregar a diversidade de pensamento tomamos decisões mais robustas e, também, cultivamos uma cultura de aprendizado e adaptabilidade.

In my experience, gathering diverse views is indeed a powerful way to counteract personal biases. Having a team with varied backgrounds and perspectives has often challenged my assumptions and highlighted aspects of situations I hadn't considered. Encouraging open dialogue and constructive criticism within the team is essential. This diversity of thought not only helps in identifying potential biases but also enriches the decision-making process by incorporating a wide range of experiences and viewpoints.

Stock your team with folks who don't look like you or went to the schools you attended. Hear and see colleagues who worked in other environments, who have life stories alien to yours. Outside of work, seize moments with people from the other side of the train tracks, bringing the same avidity as when you seek advice from those belonging to your own social circle. Devour books, film, media of all sorts. Lose yourself in a new city without maps or companions. Befriend a new stranger every week. Ask silly questions. Look hard at yourself in the mirror. Listen carefully to what others might not be saying. Allow for surprise. With a bit of practice, you'll find this deliberate extroversion rewarding -- and possibly even fun.

One thing I've found helpful in implementing structured decision-making frameworks is the use of tools like SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) and the Decision Matrix. These tools provide a systematic approach to evaluating options and outcomes, allowing for organised thoughts and assessment of alternatives against set criteria. By encouraging a more analytical approach, they help reduce the influence of emotional biases and promote rational consideration of all relevant factors.

Beyond reducing biases and organizing thoughts, structured decision-making frameworks also foster collaboration and transparency. Tools like SWOT analysis invite input from various stakeholders, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered and enhancing decision quality. This collaborative approach increases team buy-in and trust, as everyone's opinions are valued. Additionally, the transparent nature of these frameworks ensures accountability. For example, using a Decision Matrix to compare product launch strategies helps team members understand the reasoning behind the final decision, aligning everyone towards the same goal and improving execution.

Employ structured decision-making frameworks like SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) or scenario planning. These frameworks provide a systematic approach to evaluating options and mitigating biases.

Na minha experiência, quadros de decisão são vitais. Eles organizam o caos. Revelam opções. Esclarecem nuances. Uma coisa que eu achei útil foi customizar essas ferramentas. Adaptamos a análise SWOT, incluindo uma perspectiva temporal. Isso nos deu uma visão mais dinâmica e relevante. Mas entenda, essas ferramentas são guias, não correntes. O valor real está nas discussões que elas provocam. Uso-as como ponto de partida, mantendo-me aberto a insights inesperados. Essa abordagem nos ajuda a tomar decisões mais informadas e criativas, preparando-nos melhor para os desafios imprevisíveis do mundo dos negócios.

Implementing structured decision-making frameworks can provide a systematic approach to evaluating options and outcomes. Being treated as an RE for so long can lead to a general feeling of abandonment and depression; some victims are unable to fully function elsewhere when given another chance.

Reflecting on past decisions helps navigate biases and cognitive limitations by learning from previous outcomes and avoiding repeated mistakes. For example, conducting post-mortem analyses after project completion, as done by companies like Amazon, allows teams to assess what worked and what didn’t. Documenting these reflections helps identify patterns of bias, such as overestimating certain risks or underestimating time requirements. By reviewing these insights before making new decisions, teams can apply lessons learned, mitigate cognitive biases, and improve decision-making processes. This continuous learning loop enhances strategic thinking and leads to better-informed and more objective choices.

Na minha experiência, a autorreflexão é crucial. Ela revela padrões. Expõe fraquezas. Inspira crescimento. Uma coisa que eu achei útil foi instituir revisões trimestrais de decisões. Examinamos escolhas passadas, boas e ruins. Não para atribuir culpa, mas para aprender. Esse processo nos ensinou muito sobre nossos vieses coletivos. Descobrimos uma tendência a superestimar nosso controle sobre resultados. Agora, planejamos com mais humildade e flexibilidade. Esta prática de reflexão contínua não apenas melhora nossas decisões, mas também fortalece nossa resiliência como equipe, preparando-nos melhor para os desafios futuros em um ambiente de negócios em constante mudança.

L'incertitude ce n'est pas jouer à la loterie, même pas au poker. L'incertitude liée à une décision, c'est le risque que l'on estime être capable de détecter ou de canaliser dès qu'on aura pu fédérer une équipe autour d'un objectif commun. Prendre une décision c'est avant tout préparer son équipe à être capable de la valider ou de l'invalider dès lors qu'on la met en œuvre. Une bonne décision n'est pas une décision certaine, mais elle doit impérativement être en accord avec le fait que la suivre doit correspondre à une capacité de mettre en place un suivi sur son incertitude et vérifier qu'elle décroît au fil du temps. Mais sans incertitude, sans risque.... Pas de valeur ajoutée , pas d'innovation.🚀

1. Collaborative Decision Making - We can leverage the collective intelligence of team by encouraging collaboration and consensus building. We can also use the delegated authority. We can delegate the decision-making authority to the most experienced professionals on specific topic. 2. Data Driven Decisions - Avoid gut feelings or intuitions, instead use robust data and empirical evidence. We can use statistical tools and quantitative methods to analyze data and predict outcomes. 3. Regular Training and Exercise - We must engage in training sessions to identify common cognitive biases such confirmation bias and anchoring.

In my view, I believe in embracing uncertainty. The future is unpredictable, and it's beneficial to welcome changes that offer opportunities for growth and learning, even if they bring uncertainty. Embracing uncertainty is crucial, as making strategic decisions often involves navigating challenges.

Navigating biases and cognitive limitations in strategic decision-making requires a structured approach. Start by acknowledging potential biases and seeking diverse perspectives to challenge assumptions. Utilize data-driven analysis and objective criteria to inform decisions, reducing reliance on intuition alone. Encourage open dialogue and critical thinking within your team to uncover blind spots. Consider using decision-making frameworks and tools to systematically evaluate options. By fostering an environment of transparency and continuous learning, you can mitigate biases and enhance the quality of your strategic decisions.

I was always good and planning and predicting outcomes. I credit it to my approach to the situation: I’d define 3-4 likely pathways events could take, and figured out a plan that would leave me in a good-ish position no matter which happened. I’d make my man plan for what I considered to be the most likely, but left myself some space for other factors. Dealing with situational ambiguity was a critical skill in the military (and very helpful as an ER nurse now too), and not many people were able to successfully develop that skill. Another helpful attribute is the ability to let it go if things went off kilter. Instead of getting angry about it, or whining as so many do, I said to myself, “Okay. What now?”