Here's how you can spot and avoid logical fallacies in the Educational Technology industry.

Ad Hominem Description: Attacking the person making an argument rather than the argument itself. Spotting: Look for personal attacks or criticisms that are irrelevant to the argument. Avoiding: Focus on the argument's merits and evidence, not on who is making it. Straw Man Description: Misrepresenting or oversimplifying someone's argument to make it easier to attack. Spotting: Identify if the argument being criticized is a distorted version of the original. Avoiding: Address the strongest version of the opposing argument, not a weakened caricature.

Spotting and avoiding logical fallacies in the Educational Technology industry involves critically evaluating claims and arguments. Look for red flags like appeals to authority without credible sources, hasty generalizations about technology benefits, and false dichotomies that oversimplify complex issues. Seek evidence-backed arguments, consider diverse perspectives, and engage in balanced discussions to foster informed decision-making and effective problem-solving in educational technology.

Spotting and avoiding logical fallacies in the Educational Technology (EdTech) industry is crucial for making informed decisions and effectively integrating technology into educational settings. Familiarize yourself with common logical fallacies such as appeal to authority, slippery slope, false cause, strawman, etc. Understand how each fallacy distorts reasoning and can lead to faulty conclusions.

EdTech experts are like wise owls, but even owls can hoot misleadingly! Don't fall for appeal to authority - just because an "expert" says it, doesn't make it true. Experts can have biases or outdated info. Evaluate their claims - what evidence backs them up? Consider different viewpoints. Think for yourself - use experts as guides, not unquestionable sources. #EdTech #InformationLiteracy

In my experience, AI has been hyped far more than what is reasonable. There are many new 'experts' in the field that praise all the options available. However, though I do use AI for lesson planning and creating assignments I have often caught AI making mistakes and mis-labelling technical terms. I also asked ChatGPT for help finding relevant sources to site for a document I was writing. It gave me several - but knowing AI i prompted it to tell me which were real and which were made up - ChatGPT had made up about half the suggested resources - they didn't exist... Be critical! Don't use AI in areas where you lack experience or insight. It needs to be used with caution.

Pay attention to how statistics are presented and whether they accurately represent the outcomes or impact of EdTech solutions. Watch out for misleading graphs, small sample sizes, or incomplete data that could skew interpretations.

Be cautious of sweeping generalizations or assumptions about the effectiveness of certain technologies in education. Investigate whether claims are based on specific contexts, populations, or conditions that may not apply universally.

Engage with diverse stakeholders in the educational community, including educators, researchers, administrators, and students, to gather different viewpoints. Encourage discussions that consider various perspectives on the benefits and limitations of EdTech.

Recognize when emotional appeals or anecdotal evidence are used to sway opinions about EdTech products or practices. Balance emotional responses with critical analysis of empirical evidence and research-based findings.