How can you design software testing tools and frameworks to be more flexible?

Answering in just a paragraph is challenging, but, in essence, achieving flexibility in your software testing framework involves a strong emphasis on modularization and the creation of common core libraries shared across ALL tests. Each module should have a specific focus, promoting clear responsibilities. Parameterize everything possible and ensure that the tools you choose support a variety of platforms and browsers.

This is a good approach. Develop custom tests that you can take parts out of and put in other tests too. This way you will be able to test faster.

I agree! Create a project Add required dependencies Create base class Create utilities files Create page object classes Create configuration files Add required business logic test Test the execution Setup the CI-CD Maintenance and code reusability Happy Testing 😄

Organizing your code modularly is certainly important for the long term health of your application. However just as important is to be thoughtful in how your break your logic down into modules. If they aren't defined correctly you'll often end up with problems such as circular dependencies, needlessly duplicated code, and potential inconsistencies in how you manage your data.

La conception d'une solution logicielle quelques soit l'objectif et l'intérêt réalisée de façon modulaire, est une approche pertinente, pour plusieurs raisons : - l'evolutivité ; - la maintenabilité ; - la performance ; - Etc.

I agree. This is a good way. I’ve seen a lot of XML files for these things but I can imagine JSON would be also a good fit.

Using configuration files is a good way to structure your test inputs. For example I use some persistent data in form of JSON data to test the UI in mobile apps.

L'usage de paramètres stockés dans un système de configuration, comme la registry de Windows. Est utile et nécessaire, pour tout paramètres susceptibles d'avoir une variantes pour chaque utilisateur, entité qui l'utilise. On s'assurera en tout cas d'implémenter au mieux cela en fonction du système d'exploitation cible, mais aussi des considérations de sécurité nécessaires.

Using configuration files is crucial to have specific parameters setup to fit the project's needs, but you have to identify when to use environment variables in place to fixed parameters, especially when running the automated tests in a Continuous Integration pipeline, it will help change the config parameters without affecting development environments across the team. For example: const baseUrl = process.env.APPLICATION_URL || 'http://localhost'; This will use the env variable as the baseUrl parameter, or a fall-back value.

Es muy útil estandarizar nuestro código, porque como dice el artículo es más fácil darle mantenimiento y a futuro poder realizar migraciones sin tanta complicación. En pocas palabras es facilitar tu trabajo y apoyar a los demás en medida que se requiera cambiar algún requerimiento.

This is probably the most important part, but not for the reasons outlined above. The most common mistake in testing - and why they are fragile - is testing the implementation instead of the functionality. You want to test what is important to the user, not anything related to how the code is written. Test that a function returns the correct output: yes. Test that a function executes the a task on every item in a list: no. If you can't test the later through what the user of your system would experience it's irrelevant to test. Unfortunately it's easier to test implementation than output in many cases. But trust me, it's worth the investment in upskilling.

This is especially useful in reducing the chances of errors and allows faster development due to the repeated use of similar code. It is also easier to review by others, which also reduces the chances of bugs being introduced to the codebase. The use of Lint tools also helps enforce coding styles, which not only include standard rules that cover best practices but also allow to creation of custom rules that will ultimately help prevent additional issues.

In my projects integrating test automation frameworks like Selenium, PyTest, JUnit,TestNG has greatly enhanced testing tool flexibility. These frameworks can offer Language and platform flexibility. Customization options for tailored testing. Seamless integration with existing tools. Strong community support for guidance and resources. By embracing these frameworks we can streamlined workflows, adapted to project needs, and maintained high standards in software testing practices.

Que ce soit pour du développement applicatif pure, ou bien d'outillages. Notamment, des test unitaires en utilisant un socle technique spécialisé, car on part que trop rarement de zéro de nos jours. Il s'impose outre les choix techniques, la problématique de qualité et de sûreté tout autant que celles de performance. D'anticiper au mieux, en préparant l'ensemble, des l'initialisation du projet. La tâche peu sembler immense, mais elle est impérative, plus les enjeux, l'importance et la complexité du projet sont importants.

Choosing the best-automated test framework for your project could be challenging. Each test framework has its strengths, but also some limitations. Something that will help choosing the right one is choosing by coding language, always stick with the one that uses the same language as your application. It is very important that not only QA can develop automated tests, but that also the development team can aid in maintaining the tests by making the proper updates as the codebase changes.

Plus le projet est conséquent, complexe, à des enjeux élevés... Plus l'intérêt d'outiller l'ensemble des processus autour de celui-ci est nécessaire. En précisant, que la collaboration et l'implication des équipes est nécessaires. Comme leur formation a l'usage de ces outils.

Using Continuous Integration (CI) tools is a game-changer for saving time during development. It's like having a safety net: as soon as someone pushes code to a branch, the tests run automatically. If something's off, we catch it early, narrowing down the problem to exactly where things went wrong instead of combing through merged code later. This means we can fix issues on the spot before they go any further, saving everyone a bunch of time and headaches.

Nombreux sont les projets qui rencontrent des difficultés. C'est par l'anticipation, le pilotage. La mise en place d'une organisation cohérente et souple, disposant des moyens (humains, financiers, techniques...) adéquats. Que l'on s'assure la réussite du projet. Outre des objectifs claires, connus et partagés par les parties prenantes !a

Whatever approach we use just make sure we dont use it too much. Too much modular approach then necessary may end up resulting more code files to maintain hence increasing code complexity.