How do you account for roughness effects on the Reynolds number and friction factor in non-circular ducts?

1 Reynolds number for non-circular ducts

The Reynolds number (Re) is a dimensionless parameter that measures the ratio of inertial to viscous forces in a fluid flow. It indicates whether the flow is laminar, turbulent, or transitional. For circular pipes, the Re is defined as Re = (ρvD)/μ, where ρ is the fluid density, v is the average velocity, D is the pipe diameter, and μ is the dynamic viscosity. For non-circular ducts, the pipe diameter is replaced by the hydraulic diameter (Dh), which is defined as Dh = (4A)/P, where A is the cross-sectional area and P is the wetted perimeter of the duct. The wetted perimeter is the length of the duct wall that is in contact with the fluid. The hydraulic diameter represents the equivalent diameter of a circular pipe that has the same flow characteristics as the non-circular duct.

2 Friction factor for non-circular ducts

The friction factor (f) is another dimensionless parameter that measures the resistance to fluid flow in a duct. It depends on the Re and the relative roughness (ε/Dh) of the duct wall. The relative roughness is the ratio of the average height of the roughness elements (ε) to the hydraulic diameter. For circular pipes, there are empirical correlations that relate the f to the Re and the ε/D, such as the Colebrook equation or the Moody chart. For non-circular ducts, there are no universal correlations, but some specific correlations have been developed for certain geometries and flow regimes. For example, for rectangular ducts with an aspect ratio (b/a) of 2 or less, where b and a are the width and height of the duct, respectively, the following correlation can be used for turbulent flow:

f = 0.0156 + 0.171(ε/Dh)^0.563/Re^0.082

3 Roughness effects on non-circular ducts

The roughness effects on non-circular ducts are more complicated than on circular pipes, because the roughness elements can have different shapes, sizes, and distributions on the duct wall. Moreover, the roughness elements can interact with the secondary flows that are induced by the curvature and corners of the duct. These secondary flows are caused by the centrifugal force and the pressure gradient that act on the fluid near the wall. They create regions of high and low velocity and shear stress, which affect the friction losses and heat transfer. Therefore, to account for roughness effects on non-circular ducts, you need to consider not only the average height of the roughness elements, but also their geometry, orientation, and location on the duct wall.

4 Methods to account for roughness effects on non-circular ducts

There are different methods to account for roughness effects on non-circular ducts, depending on the level of accuracy and complexity that you need. One method is to use empirical correlations that have been derived from experimental data for specific duct geometries and roughness types. These correlations can provide reasonable estimates of the f and the Re for non-circular ducts, but they may not be applicable to other duct shapes or roughness conditions. Another method is to use numerical simulations that can solve the governing equations of fluid flow and heat transfer for any duct geometry and roughness configuration. These simulations can capture the detailed effects of roughness on non-circular ducts, but they require more computational resources and expertise. A third method is to use dimensional analysis and similarity principles that can relate the f and the Re for non-circular ducts to those for circular pipes with equivalent roughness. These principles can provide general guidelines for scaling and comparing non-circular ducts, but they may not account for all the factors that influence the flow behavior.

5 Benefits and challenges of accounting for roughness effects on non-circular ducts

Accounting for roughness effects on non-circular ducts can help you improve the performance and efficiency of your chemical process. By knowing how roughness affects the pressure drop and heat transfer in non-circular ducts, you can optimize the design and operation of your equipment, such as selecting the appropriate duct size, shape, material, and surface treatment. You can also reduce the energy consumption and emissions of your process, by minimizing the friction losses and enhancing the heat transfer in non-circular ducts. However, accounting for roughness effects on non-circular ducts also poses some challenges, such as finding reliable and relevant data and correlations for your specific duct geometry and roughness condition, choosing the suitable method and tools for your analysis and simulation, and validating and verifying your results and assumptions.

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?