How do you defend your structural engineering decisions to peers?

1 Know your standards

The first step to defending your structural engineering decisions is to know the relevant standards and codes that apply to your project. These may include national, regional, or industry-specific guidelines that specify the minimum requirements for structural performance, safety, and durability. You should be familiar with the sources, interpretations, and limitations of these standards, and be able to explain how your design complies with them. You should also be aware of any deviations or exceptions that you have made, and justify them with sound engineering judgment.

2 Document your process

The second step to defending your structural engineering decisions is to document your design process and analysis methods. This means keeping a clear and organized record of your assumptions, calculations, data, models, tests, and results. You should be able to show how you arrived at your decisions, what factors you considered, and what alternatives you evaluated. You should also be able to demonstrate the validity and reliability of your data and models, and how you verified and validated your results. By documenting your process, you can provide evidence and transparency for your decisions, and make it easier for your peers to review and understand your work.

3 Communicate your rationale

The third step to defending your structural engineering decisions is to communicate your rationale and objectives clearly and concisely. This means using appropriate language, terminology, and formats to convey your design logic and analysis outcomes. You should be able to summarize the main features and benefits of your design, and highlight the key challenges and solutions that you faced. You should also be able to present your work in a visual and interactive way, using diagrams, charts, graphs, tables, or software tools. By communicating your rationale, you can show your peers the value and relevance of your decisions, and persuade them to accept your work.

4 Address feedback and questions

The fourth step to defending your structural engineering decisions is to address feedback and questions from your peers respectfully and professionally. This means listening to their opinions and concerns, acknowledging their points, and responding to their queries. You should be prepared to explain or clarify any aspects of your work that may be unclear or confusing, and to provide additional information or evidence if needed. You should also be open to constructive criticism and suggestions, and be willing to modify or improve your work if necessary. By addressing feedback and questions, you can show your peers that you respect their input and expertise, and that you are committed to achieving the best possible outcome.

5 Learn from others

The final step to defending your structural engineering decisions is to learn from others and improve your skills and knowledge. This means seeking feedback and advice from your peers, mentors, or experts, and reflecting on your strengths and weaknesses. You should also keep up to date with the latest developments and trends in structural engineering, and explore new ideas and innovations. You should also participate in professional networks and communities, and share your work and insights with others. By learning from others, you can enhance your competence and confidence as a structural engineer, and be ready to defend your decisions in any situation.

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?