How do you interpret the results of a meta-analysis?

Meta-analysis is a powerful tool for synthesizing evidence from multiple studies on a specific topic. It can help you identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the literature, as well as estimate the overall effect size and heterogeneity of a phenomenon. However, interpreting the results of a meta-analysis requires some skills and caution. In this article, you will learn how to read and understand the key components of a meta-analysis report, such as the forest plot, the summary effect, the confidence interval, the heterogeneity statistics, and the publication bias assessment.

1 Forest plot

A forest plot is a graphical representation of the results of a meta-analysis, which can help you compare the magnitude and direction of effects across studies, as well as the precision and consistency of the estimates. To interpret a forest plot, you need to consider the horizontal axis, which indicates the scale of the effect size; the vertical axis, which indicates the order or weight of the studies; the squares, which represent the effect size of each study; the horizontal lines, which represent the confidence interval of each study; the diamond, which represents the summary effect and confidence interval of the meta-analysis; the vertical line, which represents the null value or no effect; and finally, the shaded area, which indicates values of the effect size that are significantly different from the null value.

Add your perspective

Lokesh Joshi

GroKalp H2CNT | Innovation - Hydrogen - CNT | India, Russia & Saudi Arabia
Report contribution
My advice is to approach the interpretation of meta-analysis results cautiously, considering the Forest plot as a visual aid. Just as Infosys utilized meta-analysis in evaluating its global expansion strategies, scrutinize the Forest plot to assess the overall effect size and confidence intervals of multiple studies. Look for patterns, subgroup analyses, and outliers to gauge the robustness and generalizability of the findings. Remember, like any analytical tool, meta-analysis requires a nuanced understanding of the context and study quality, ensuring informed decision-making akin to Infosys' strategic moves in the corporate landscape.

Like

2 Summary effect

Interpreting the summary effect of a meta-analysis is essential to understanding the true effect size of the phenomenon under investigation. When considering the summary effect, you should take into account its magnitude, direction, and significance. The magnitude reflects the size of the effect size, which can be influenced by the scale and unit of measurement, as well as its practical and clinical relevance. The direction indicates whether the effect size is positive or negative, indicating the nature and direction of any relationship or difference. The significance is tested by using a p-value or a confidence interval; if either one is less than a predetermined threshold (usually 0.05), then it is considered significant. Ultimately, these three aspects are important for determining the true effect size of a meta-analysis.

Add your perspective

Lokesh Joshi

GroKalp H2CNT | Innovation - Hydrogen - CNT | India, Russia & Saudi Arabia
Report contribution
I like reading meta-analyses in the corporate context, similar to how a meta-analysis combines and analyzes data from multiple studies to derive a summary effect. For instance, in the Indian corporate landscape, I find that analyzing the performance of companies like Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) through a meta-analytical lens, considering various financial indicators and market trends, provides a comprehensive overview of their overall success and strategic effectiveness. This approach helps in identifying the summary effect on their business strategies and financial outcomes.

Like

3 Heterogeneity statistics

Heterogeneity is the variation or diversity of the effect sizes across the individual studies, which can affect the validity and generalizability of the summary effect. To assess the heterogeneity, you need to examine three statistics: the Q statistic, which measures the total amount of variation across the studies; the I-squared statistic, a measure of inconsistency that estimates the proportion of variation due to heterogeneity; and the tau-squared statistic, a measure of dispersion that reflects the amount of heterogeneity not explained by sampling error. The Q statistic follows a chi-square distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the number of studies minus one. A significant Q statistic (p-value less than 0.05) indicates that the heterogeneity is greater than expected by chance. The I-squared statistic ranges from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating more heterogeneity. There is no definitive cut-off for interpreting it, but generally 0-25% is low heterogeneity, 25-50% is moderate heterogeneity, 50-75% is substantial heterogeneity, and 75-100% is considerable heterogeneity. The tau-squared statistic reflects more uncertainty in the summary effect if it is larger.

Add your perspective

4 Publication bias assessment

Publication bias is the tendency to publish studies that have significant or positive results more than studies that have non-significant or negative results. This can distort the summary effect and reduce the validity of a meta-analysis. To detect and correct publication bias, you can use the funnel plot, Egger's test, and trim-and-fill method. The funnel plot is a scatter plot of effect size versus standard error of each study. It should be symmetrical and resemble an inverted funnel without publication bias. The Egger's test measures correlation between effect size and standard error using a linear regression model. A significant Egger's test indicates evidence of publication bias. Lastly, the trim-and-fill method imputes missing or unpublished studies based on the symmetry of the funnel plot, recalculates the summary effect, and compares it with the uncorrected one. A larger difference suggests more publication bias and more adjustment needed.

Add your perspective

5 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

Add your perspective

How do you interpret the results of a meta-analysis?

1

2

3

4

5

1 Forest plot

2 Summary effect

3 Heterogeneity statistics

4 Publication bias assessment

5 Here’s what else to consider

Research Management

Rate this article

Thanks for your feedback

More articles on Research Management

More relevant reading