What are the best practices for selecting and applying comparables in MAP cases?
One of the most challenging aspects of transfer pricing is finding and using reliable comparables to support the arm's length principle. Comparables are independent transactions or entities that can be used as benchmarks to evaluate the transfer prices of related parties. However, comparables are not always easy to find, especially in complex or unique transactions, or in different markets or jurisdictions. This can lead to disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities, and potentially trigger a mutual agreement procedure (MAP) to resolve them. A MAP is a mechanism that allows competent authorities of two or more countries to consult and negotiate on a transfer pricing adjustment that affects the taxable income of a taxpayer in both countries. In this article, you will learn what are the best practices for selecting and applying comparables in MAP cases, and how to avoid common pitfalls and errors.