What do you do if logical reasoning exacerbates social inequalities?

T&T is very diverse, highly integrated, mixed yet small—intimate knowledge inlaid with assumptions speaks as truth as we openly enjoy our sameness in our difference. My grandfather, "We live in the obviousness of human equality where for others it is but a theory. This is our gift to the world." A client once asked me whether a particular model was too black. I said it didn't matter. In the absence of research with respect to the actual impact of the model’s use, I am left to wonder whether it was ethical as trusted marketing advisor to take a personal ethical position, given my knowledge of our history and the persistent complexity of our complexes. I paraphrase a friend, prejudice is by consensus. Challenging the status quo? Do it big.

As a gender expert, I have worked on many global strategies to address inequity in the impact industry. Some effective strategies I have found to address the gaps are: 1. Institute standards in place that address discrimination, bias, and unequal behaviours 2. Have regular coaching and mentoring to address these activities and help the people to course-correct 3. Take help from their party experts to address these concerns and incorporate a strategy to bridge the gap 4. Offer solutions through research and innovation that help in finding effective solutions.

So much of systemic bias emerges from seemingly 'neutral' policies and practices that have inequitable and unfair outcomes. I would perhaps lean on metrics and research here and use those to illuminate where bias persists, whether or not intentioned.

Challenging social inequalities means changing people's behavior and perceptions - not a one-man task. One thing I've found useful is to recognize and call out the bias, that seats the situation firmly. Determine the primary stakeholder to whom resolution is most due. Next act first in their interest - with integrity and reasonability - to resolve the issue. Resolve, take note of the underlying social inequalities and make a plan of action that will make future similar situations better. This seems a logical approach to me. If this approach does not work then simply walk away.

Considering the opinion of experienced people will always give you a better vision about anything you want to do. These people have been through many situations and could give you more than one perspective on a problem, so they will always be people to keep in mind.

It is assumed that ethics seeks equity, and social well-being, respecting the values of each individual, therefore the opinion of each of them should be taken into account.

Social changes are good, however the people who make the changes should first visualize different perspectives regarding the expected results so that these decisions are more empathetic and equitable.

La adaptabilidad al cambio y el aprendizaje continuo de cada persona, debería ser lo mas importante para ellos, ya que siempre hay algo bueno que aprender aun de las cosas malas que te puedan ocurrir o los momentos difíciles por los que tengas que atravesar. The adaptability to change and continuous learning of each person should be the most important thing for them, since there is always something good to learn even from the bad things that may happen to you or the difficult times you have to go through.